Watching your foot move - An fMRI study of visuomotor interactions during foot movement

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1906-1917

  Christensen, Mark Schram ^a,b   Lundbye Jensen, Jesper ^a,c   Petersen, Nicolas ^a,c   Geertsen, Svend Sparre ^a,c   Paulson, Olaf B ^b   Nielsen, Jens Bo ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b HVIDOVRE HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Cerebellum; Externally generated; Posterior parietal cortex; Self generated

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANKLE; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; BRAIN REGION; CEREBELLUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FOOT; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; CEREBELLUM; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; FOOT; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NERVE NET; OXYGEN; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REST; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34547692811     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhl101     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Andersen RA, Essick GK, Siegel RM. 1985. Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. Science. 230(4724):456-458.
2. Angel RW. 1976. Efference copy in the control of movement. Neurology. 26(12):1164-1168.
3. Blakemore S-J, Sirigu A. 2003. Action prediction in the cerebellum and in the parietal lobe. Exp Brain Res. 153(2):239-245.
4. Blakemore S-J, Wolpert DM, Frith CD. 1998. Central cancellation of selfproduced tickle sensation. Nat Neurosci. 1(7):635-640.
5. Christensen LO, Johannsen P, Sinkjær T, Petersen N, Pyndt HS, Nielsen JB. 2000. Cerebral activation during bicycle movements in man. Exp Brain Res. 135(1):66-72.
6. Chronicle EP, Glover J. 2003. A ticklish question: Does magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex give rise to an "efference copy." Cortex. 39:105-110.
7. Ciccarelli O, Toosy AT, Marsden JF, Wheeler-Kingshott CM, Sahyoun C, Matthews PM, Miller DH, Thompson AJ. 2005. Identifying brain regions for integrative sensorimotor processing with ankle movements. Exp Brain Res. 166(1):31-41.
8. Clower DM, Hoffman JM, Votaw JR, Faber TL, Woods RP, Alexander GE. 1996. Role of posterior parietal cortex in the recalibration of visually guided reaching. Nature. 383(6601):618-621.
9. Clower DM, West RA, Lynch JC, Strick PL. 2001. The inferior parietal lobule is the target of output from the superior colliculus, hippocampus, and cerebellum. J Neurosci. 21(16):6283-6291.
10. Cohen YE, Andersen RA. 2002. A common refrence frame for movement plans in the posterior parietal cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci. 3(7):553-562.
11. Culham JC, Danckert SL, DeSouza JF, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA. 2003. Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Exp Brain Res. 153(2):180-189.
12. Della-Maggiore V, Malfait N, Ostry DJ, Paus T. 2004. Stimulation of the posterior parietal cortex interferes with arm trajectory adjustments during the learning of new dynamics. J Neurosci. 24(44):9971-9976.
13. Desmurget M, Epstein CM, Turner RS, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, Grafton ST. 1999. Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nat Neurosci. 2(6):563-567.
14. Desmurget M, Grafton S. 2000. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci. 4(11):423-431.
15. Dobkin BH, Firestine A, West M, Saremi K, Woods R. 2004. Ankle dorsiflexion as an fMRI paradigm to assay motor control for walking during rehabilitation. Neuroimage. 23(1):370-381.
16. Duvernoy HM. 1999. The human brain: surface, three-dimensional sectional anatomy with MRI, and blood supply. Berlin (Germany): Springer Verlag.
17. Ehrsson HH, Fagergren E, Forssberg H. 2001. Differential fronto-parietal activation depending on force used in a precision grip task: an fMRI study. J Neurophysiol. 85(6):2613-2623.
18. Eickhoff SB, Stephan KE, Mohlberg H, Grefkes C, Fink GR, Amunts K, Zilles K. 2005. A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage. 25:1325-1335.
19. Ellaway PH, Prochazka A, Chan M, Gauthier MJ. 2004. The sense of movement elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation in humans is due to sensory feedback. J Physiol. 556(2):651-660.
20. Eskandar EN, Assad JA. 1999. Dissociation of visual, motor and predictive signals in parietal cortex during visual guidance. Nat Neurosci. 2(1):88-93.
21. Fogassi L, Luppino G. 2005. Motor functions of the parietal lobe. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 15(6):626-631.
22. Friston KJ, Penny WD, Glaser DE. 2005. Conjunction revisited. Neuroimage. 25(3):661-667.
23. Friston KJ, Williams S, Howard R, Frackowiak RS, Turner R. 1996. Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magn Reson Med. 35(3):346-355.
24. Genovese CR, Lazar NA, Nichols T. 2002. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage. 15(4):870-878.
25. Glaser D, Friston K. 2004. Chapter 39: variance components. In: Frackowiak RSJ, Friston KJ, Frith CD, Dolan RJ, Price CJ, Zeki S, Ashburner J, Penny W, editors. Human brain function. 2nd ed. San Diego (CA): Elsevier. p. 781-791.
26. Glover GH, Li T-Q, Ress D. 2000. Image-based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR. Magn Reson Med. 44(1):162-167.
27. Grefkes C, Ritzl A, Zilles K, Fink GR. 2004. Human medial intraparietal cortex subserves visuomotor transformation. Neuroimage. 23(4):1494-1506.
28. Haggard P, Whitford B. 2004. Supplementary motor area provides an efferent signal for sensory suppression. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 19(1):52-58.
29. Haruno M, Wolpert DM, Kawato M. 2001. MOSAIC Model for Sensorimotor Learning and Control. Neural Comp. 13:2201-2220.
30. Iacoboni M. Forthcoming 2006. Visuo-motor integration and control in the human posterior parietal cortex: evidence from TMS and fMRI. Neuropsychologia.
31. Imamizu H, Kuroda T, Mizauchi S, Yoshioka T, Kawato M. 2003. Modular organization of internal models of tools in the human cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:5461-5466.
32. Imamizu H, Kuroda T, Yoshioka T, Kawato M. 2004. Functional magnetic resonance imaging examination of two modular architectures for switching multiple internal models. J Neurosci. 24(5):1173-1181.
33. Jeannerod M. 1988. The neural and behavioural organization of goaldirected movements. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.
34. Johannsen P, Christensen LO, Sinkjær T, Nielsen JB. 2001. Cerebral functional anatomy of voluntary contractions of ankle muscles in man. J Physiol. 535(2):397-406.
35. Jueptner M, Jenkins IH, Brooks DJ, Frackowiak RS, Passingham RE. 1996. The sensory guidance of movement: a comparison of the cerebellum and basal ganglia. Exp Brain Res. 112(3):462-474.
36. Kertzman C, Schwarz U, Zeffiro TA, Hallett M. 1997. The role of posterior parietal cortex in visually guided movements in humans. Exp Brain Res. 114(1):170-183.
37. Kornhuber HH, Deecke L. 1965. Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente Potentiale. Pflügers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 284:1-17.
38. Lund TE, Madsen KH, Sidaros K, Luo W-L, Nichols TE. 2006. Non-white noise in fMRI: does modelling have an impact? Neuroimage. 29(1): 54-66.
39. Lund TE, Nørgaard MD, Rostrup E, Rowe JB, Paulson OB. 2005. Motion or activity: their role in intra- and inter-subject variation in fMRI. Neuroimage. 26(3):960-964.
40. MacDonald PA, Paus T. 2003. The role of parietal cortex in awareness of self-generated movements: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cereb Cortex. 13(9):962-967.
41. MacIntosh BJ, Mraz R, Baker N, Tam F, Staines WR, Graham SJ. 2004. Optimizing the experimental design for ankle dorsiflexion fMRI. Neuroimage. 22(4):1619-1627.
42. Mima T, Sadato N, Yazawa S, Hanakawa T, Fukuyama H, Yonekura Y, Shibasaki H. 1999. Brain structures related to active and passive finger movements in man. Brain. 122(10):1989-1997.
43. Nichols T, Brett M, Anderson J, Wager T, Poline J-B. 2005. Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. Neuroimage. 25(3):653-660.
44. Nielsen JB. 2003. How we walk: central control of muscle activity during human walking. Neuroscientist. 9(3):195-204.
45. Prablanc C, Desmurget M, Grea H. 2003. Neural control of on-line guidance of hand reaching movements. Prog Brain Res. 142:155-170.
46. Reddy H, Floyer A, Donaghy M, Matthews PM. 2001. Altered cortical activation with finger movement after peripheral denervation: comparison of active and passive tasks. Exp Brain Res. 138(4):484-491.
47. Reynolds RF, Day BL. 2005. Visual guidance of the human foot during a step. J Physiol. 569(Pt 2):677-684.
48. Rowe J, Friston K, Frackowiak R, Passingham R. 2002. Attention to action: specific modulation of corticocortical interactions in humans. Neuroimage. 17(2):988-998.
49. Sirigu A, Daprati E, Pradat-Diehl P, Franck N, Jeannerod M. 1999. Perception of self-generated movement following left parietal lesion. Brain. 122(10):1867-1874.
50. Sperry R. 1950. Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. J Comp Physiol Psych. 43(6):482-489.
51. Stein JF. 1989. Representation of egocentric space in the posterior parietal cortex. Q J Exp Physiol. 74(5):583-606.
52. Stein JF, Glickstein M. 1992. Role of the cerebellum in visual guidance of movement. Physiol Rev. 72(4):967-1017.
53. van Duinen H, Zijdewind I, Hoogudin H, Maurits N. 2005. Surface EMG measurements during fMRI at 3T: accurate EMG recordings after artifact correction. Neuroimage. 27(1):240-246.
54. von Holst E, Mittelstaedt H. 1950. Das Reafferenzprincip. (Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie). Naturwissenschaften. 37:464-476.
55. Wolpert DM, Kawato M. 1998. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw 11:1026-1034.