The effects of scene complexity, stereovision, and motion parallax on size constancy in a virtual environment

Proceedings - IEEE Virtual Reality

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 59-66

  Luo, Xun ^a   Kenyon, Robert ^a   Kamper, Derek ^b   Sandin, Daniel ^a   DeFanti, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Effects; Size constancy; Virtual reality; Visual factors

Indexed keywords

SCENE COMPLEXITY; SIZE CONSTANCY; VIRTUAL OBJECTS; VISUAL FACTORS;

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DATA ACQUISITION; DATA REDUCTION; STEREO VISION; USER INTERFACES;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 34547681707     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/VR.2007.352464     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. J. Huber, N. Stringer, I. Davies, and D. Field, Only stereo information improves performance in surgical tasks, SPIE 5372: 463-470, 2004
2. A. Beall, J. Loomis, J. Philbeck, and T. Fikes, Absolute motion parallax weakly determines visual scale in real and virtual environments, SPIE 2411:288-297, 1995
3. P. Rondot, J. Lessard, and J. Robert, Study of motion parallax in depth perception with a helmet-mounted display system used in teleoperation, SPIE 2590:151-159, 1995
4. C. Ikehara, R. Cole, and J. Merritt, Effects of test structure on depth perception measurement tasks, SPIE 1669:135-141, 1992
5. S. Watt, et al, Can observers exploit enhanced motion parallax to control reaching movements within telepresence environments? SPIE 4299:429-438, 2001
6. P. Rosen, Z. Pizlo, C. Hoffmann, and V. Popescu, Perception of 3D spatial relations for 3D displays, SPIE 5291:9-16, 2004
7. M. Hirose, K. Hirota, and R. Kijima, Human behavior in virtual environments, SPIE 1666: 548-553, 1992.
8. C. Cruz, D. Sandin, T. Defanti, R. Kenyon, and J. Hart, The CAVE Audio-Visual Environment. ACM Trans. on Graphics, 35: 65-72, 1992.
9. B. Holaday, Die Grössenkonstanz der Sehdinge bei Variation der innerenund äusseren Wahrnehmungsbedingungen. Arch. ges. Psychol., 88: 419-486, 1933.
10. L. Harvey, H. Leibowitz, Effects of exposure duration, cue reduction, and temporary monocularity on size matching at short distances, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 57: 2, pp. 249-253, 1967.
11. H. Leibowitz, R. Dato, Visual size-constancy as a function of distance for temporarily and permanently monocular observers. Am. J. Psychol. 79: 279, 1966.
12. R. Eggleston, W. Janson and K. Aldrich, Virtual reality system effects on size-distance judgments in a virtual environment. Proc. VRAIS, pp 139-146, 1996
13. Baitch, L., Smith, R.C., Physiological Correlates of Spatial Perceptual Discordance in a Virtual Environment, in Proc. Fourth International Projection Technology Workshop, Ames, Iowa, 2000.
14. X. Luo, R. Kenyon, T. line, H.Waldinger and D.Kamper, An Augmented Reality Environment for Post-Stroke Finger Extension Rehabilitation. Proc. ICORR 2005, Chicago, IL, June 2005.
15. A. Holway, E. Boring, Determinants of Apparent Visual Size with Distance Variant. American Journal of Psychology, 54, pp. 121-151., 1941.