Only stereo information improves performance in surgical tasks

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 5, Issue 26, 2004, Pages 463-470

  Huber, Jörg W ^a,b   Stringer, Neil S ^b   Davies, Ian R L ^b   Field, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROEHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3d; Augmented reality; Laparoscopy; Motion parallax; Stereo disparity; Surgery; Telepresence

Indexed keywords

APPRENTICES; ECONOMICS; HEALTH; MEDICAL IMAGING; PATIENT MONITORING; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; VIDEO CAMERAS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

3D; LAPAROSCOPY; MOTION PARALLAX; STEREO DISPARITY; TELEPRESENCE;

SURGERY;

EID: 12144254105     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.544718     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. 1995. Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Rogers, B. J., & Graham, M. E. 1979. Motion Parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception, 8, 125-134.
3. Haber, R.N. 1980, Perceiving space from pictures: A theoretical analysis, in M A Hagen (ed.), The perception of pictures. New York: Academic Press, 3-31.
4. Peitgen, K., Walz, M. V., Holtmann, G., & Bigler, F. W. 1996. A prospective randomised experimental evaluation of three-dimensional imaging in laparoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 44 (3), 262-267.
5. Buess, G.F., van Bergen, P., Kunert, W. and Schurr, M.O.1996, Vergleichsstudie verschiedener 2-D-und 3-D-Sichtsysteme in der minimal-invasiven Chirurgie, Der Chirurg, 67, 1041-1046.
6. Pietrabissa, A., Scarcello, E., Carobbi, A. and Mosca, F. 1994, Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video system for the trained endoscopic surgeon and the beginner, Endo. Surgery, 2, 315-317.
7. Von Pichler, C., Radermacher, K. and Rau, G. 1996, The state of 3-d technology and evaluation, Minimal Invasive Therapy & Allied Technology, 5, 419-426.
8. Dion, Y.M. and Gaillard, F. 1997, Visual integration of data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy. Influence of 2D and 3-D video-camera systems, Surgical Endoscopy, 11, 995-1000.
9. Huber, JW, Taffinder, N1, Russell, RCG1, Darzi, A 2002. The effects of different viewing conditions on performance in simulated minimal access surgery. Ergonomics,46, 999-1016.
10. Hanna, G.B., Shimi, S.M. and Cuschieri, A. 1998, Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Lancet, 351, 248-251.
11. Chan, A.C. W, Chung S.C.S., Yim, A.P.C., Lau, J.Y.W., Ng, E.K.W., and Li, A.K.C. 1997, Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 11, 438-440.
12. Smets, G. J. F., Overbeeke, C. J., & Stratmann, M. H. (1987). Depth on a flat screen. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 1023-1034.
13. Steele, Hosking, & Chung, 1994 Steele, R. J. C., Hosking, S. W., & Chung, S. C. S. (1994). Graded Exercises for Basic Training in Laparoscopic Surgery. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, 39(2), 112-116.
14. Baragona, S. (2001). Doctors practice laparoscopy surgery outside the operating room. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, News Services, Research News, June 14, 2001(292). Retrieved from http://www.unc.edu/news/ newsserv/research/jun01/linc061401.htm.
15. Falk, V., Mintz, D., Grünenfelder, J., Fann, J. I., & Burdon, T. A. (2001). Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance. Surgical Endoscopy: Ultrasound and Interventional Techniques, 15, 1282-1288.
16. Stringer, N. S. (2003). The Use of Enhanced Depth Information in Telepresence. Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Psychology, School of Human Sciences, Guildford: University of Surrey.