Utility scoring of product reviews

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 51-57

  Zhang, Zhu ^a   Varadarajan, Balaji ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

Regression; Text sentiment analysis; Utility

Indexed keywords

REAL-WORLD DATA SETS; TEXT SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; UTILITY;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TEXT PROCESSING;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 34547615916     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1183614.1183626     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines,2001. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/ libsvm.
2. Y. Choi, C. Cardie, E. Riloff, and S. Patwardhan. Identifying sources of opinions with conditional random fields and extraction patterns. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing,pages 355-362, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, October 2005. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. K. Dave, S. Lawrence, and D. M. Pennock. Mining the peanut gallery: opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In WWW '03: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web,pages 519-528, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM Press.
4. V. Hatzivassiloglou and J. M. Wiebe. Effects of adjective orientation and gradability on sentence subjectivity. In Proceedings of the 18th conference on Computational linguistics,pages 299-305, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2000. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. D. Lin. Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In COLING-ACL,pages 768-774, 1998.
6. B. Liu, M. Hu, and J. Cheng. Opinion observer: analyzing and comparing opinions on the web. In WWW '05: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web,pages 342-351, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.
7. B. Pang and L. Lee. A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'04), Main Volume,pages 271-278, Barcelona, Spain, July 2004.
8. B. Pang and L. Lee. Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'05),pages 115-124, Ann Arbor, Michigan, June 2005. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. B. Pang, L. Lee, and S. Vaithyanathan. Thumbs up? sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP),pages 79-86, Philadelphia, July 2002. Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. A.-M. Popescu and O. Etzioni. Extracting product features and opinions from reviews. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing,pages 339-346, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, October 2005. Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. E. Riloff and J. Wiebe. Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. In M. Collins and M. Steedman, editors, Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing,pages 105-112, 2003.
12. E. Riloff, J. Wiebe, and W. Phillips. Exploiting subjectivity classification to improve information extraction. In AAAI,pages 1106-1111, 2005.
13. E. Riloff, J. Wiebe, and T. Wilson. Learning subjective nouns using extraction pattern bootstrapping. In W. Daelemans and M. Osborne, editors, Proceedings of CoNLL-2003,pages 25-32. Edmonton, Canada, 2003.
14. G. Salton and M. J. McGill. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval.McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1986.
15. V. Stoyanov, C. Cardie, and J. Wiebe. Multi-perspective question answering using the opqa corpus. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing,pages 923-930, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, October 2005. Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. M. Thelen and E. Riloff. A bootstrapping method for learning semantic lexicons using extraction pattern contexts. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP),pages 214-221, Philadelphia, July 2002. Association for Computational Linguistics.
17. P. D. Turney. Thumbs up or thumbs down?: semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In ACL '02: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguisticspages 417-424, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2001. Association for Computational Linguistics.
18. J. Wiebe. Learning subjective adjectives from corpora, In AAAI/IAAI,pages 735-740, 2000.
19. J. Wiebe, T. Wilson, R. Bruce, M. Bell, and M. Martin. Learning subjective language. Computational Linguistics,30(3):277-308, 2004.
20. T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, and P. Hoffmann. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing,pages 347-354, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, October 2005. Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, and R. Hwa. Just how mad are you? finding strong and weak opinion clauses. In AAAI,pages 761-769, 2004.
22. I. H. Witten and E. Frank. Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques.Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2005.
23. H. Yu and V. Hatzivassiloglou. Towards answering opinion questions: separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. In Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing,pages 129-136, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2003. Association for Computational Linguistics.