Competition for food and mates by dominant and subordinate male rock shrimp, Rhynchocinetes typus

Behaviour

Volumn 144, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 33-59

  Dennenmoser, Stefan ^a,b   Thiel, Martin ^a,c  

^a Universidad Católica del Norte   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^c CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS AVANZADOS EN ZONAS ÁRIDAS CEAZA   (Chile)

Author keywords

Alternative tactics; Competition; Foraging; Locomotor activity; Mating; RHP; Searching; Subjective resource value

Indexed keywords

DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); INVERTEBRATA; RHYNCHOCINETES TYPUS; SICYONIIDAE;

EID: 34547582704     PISSN: 00057959     EISSN: 1568539X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156853907779947382     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Alonzo, S.H. & Warner, R.R. (2000). Allocation to mate guarding or increased sperm production in a Mediterranean wrasse. - Am. Nat. 156: 266-275.
2. Arana, P. & Henríquez, P. (1983). El camarón de roca, Rhynchocinetes typus Milne Edwards, 1837 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Rhynchocinetidae). Variaciones diarias y estacionales de la captura con trampas. - Invest. Mar., Valaparaíso 11: 31-50.
3. Barki, A., Karplus, I. & Goren, M. (1992). Effects of size and morphotype on dominance hierarchies and resource competition in the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. - Anim. Behav. 44: 547-555.
4. Beehler, B.M. & Foster, M.S. (1988). Hotshots, hotspots, and female preference in the organization of lek mating systems. - Am. Nat. 131: 203-219.
5. Blanckenhorn, W.U., Grant, J.W.A. & Fairbairn, D.J. (1998). Monopolization in a resource queue: water striders competing for food and mates. -Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42: 63-70.
6. Brockmann, H.J. & Barnard, C.J. (1979). Kleptoparasitism in birds. - Anim. Behav. 27: 487-514.
7. Brown, J.L. (1964). The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems. - Wilson Bull. 76: 160-169.
8. Caillaux, L.M. & Stotz, W.B. (2003). Distribution and abundance of Rhynchocinetes typus Milne Edwards (Crustacea Decapoda), in different benthic community structures in northern Chile. -J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK 83: 1-9.
9. Chase, I.D., Tovey, C. & Murch, P. (2003). Two's company, three's a crowd: differences in dominance relationships in isolated versus socially embedded pairs of fish. - Behaviour 140: 1193-1217.
10. Christenson, T.E. & Goist, K.C. Jr. (1979). Costs and benefits of male-male competition in the orb weaving spider, Nephila clavipes. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 5: 87-92.
11. Correa, C., Baeza, A., Dupré, E., Hinojosa, I. & Thiel, M. (2000). Mating behavior and fertilization success of three ontogenetic stages of male rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea). - J. Crust. Biol. 20: 628-640.
12. Correa, C., Baeza, A., Hinojosa, I. & Thiel, M. (2003). Male dominance hierarchy and mating tactics in the rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea). - J. Crust. Biol. 23: 33-45.
13. Correa, C. & Thiel, M. (2003a). Mating systems in caridean shrimp (Decapoda: Caridea) and the evolutionary consequences for sexual dimorphism and reproductive biology. - Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 76: 187-203.
14. Correa, C. & Thiel, M. (2003b). Population structure and operational sex ratio in the rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea). -J. Crust. Biol. 23: 849-861.
15. Dearborn, D.C. (1998). Interspecific territoriality by a Rufous-Tailed Hummingbird (Amazilia tzacatl): effects of intruder size and resource value. - Biotropica 30: 306-313.
16. DeNardo, D.F. & Sinervo, B. (1994). Effects of steroid hormone interaction on activity and home range size of male lizards. - Horm. Behav. 27: 184-199.
17. Diaz, E.R. & Thiel, M. (2003). Female rock shrimp prefer dominant males. - J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK 83: 941-942.
18. Diaz, E.R. & Thiel, M. (2004). Chemical and visual communication during mate searching in rock shrimp. - Biol. Bull. 206: 134-143.
19. Dingemanse, N.J. & de Goede, P. (2004). The relation between dominance and exploratory behavior is context-dependent in wild, great tits. - Behav. Ecol. 15: 1023-1030.
20. Dugatkin, L.A. & Ohlsen, R. (1990). Contrasting asymmetries in value expectation and resource holding power - effects on attack behaviour and dominance in the pumpkinseed sunfish, Lepomis gibbosus. - Anim. Behav. 39: 802-804.
21. Emlen, S.T. & Oring, L.W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. - Science 197: 215-223.
22. Enquist, M. & Leimar, O. (1987). Evolution of fighting behaviour: The effect of variation in resource value. - J. Theor. Biol. 127: 187-205.
23. Ens, B.J. & Goss-Custard, J.D. (1984). Interference among oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus, feeding on mussels, Mytilus edulis, on the Exe estuary. - J. Anim. Ecol. 53: 217-231.
24. Gherardi, F. (2006). Fighting behavior in hermit crabs: the combined effect of resourceholding potential and resource value in Pagurus longicarpus. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59: 500-510.
25. Ghiselin, M.T. (1974). The economy of nature and the evolution of sex. - University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
26. Goldberg, J.L., Grant, J.W.A. & Lefebvre, L. (2001). Effects of the temporal predictability and spatial clumping of food on the intensity of competitive aggression in the Zenaida dove. - Behav. Ecol. 12: 490-495.
27. Grand, T.C. & Grant, J.W.A. (1994). Spatial predictability of food influences its monopolization and defense by juvenile convict cichlids. - Anim. Behav. 47: 91-100.
28. Grant, J.W.A., Bryant, M.J. & Soos, C.E. (1995). Operational sex ratio, mediated by synchrony of femal arrival, alters the variance of male mating success in Japanese medaka. - Anim. Behav. 49: 367-375.
29. Grant, J.W.A., Gaboury, C.L. & Levitt, H.L. (2000). Competitor-to-resource ratio, a general formulation of operational sex ratio, as a predictor of competitive aggression in Japanese medaka (Pisces: Oryziidae). - Behav. Ecol. 11: 670-675.
30. Grant, J.W.A. & Kramer, D.L. (1992). Temporal clumping of food arrival reduces its monopolization and defence by zebrafish, Brachydanio reno. - Anim. Behav. 44: 101-110.
31. Hinojosa, I. & Thiel, M. (2003). Somatic and gametic resources in male rock shrimp, Rhynchocinetes typus: effect of mating potential and ontogenetic male stage. - Anim. Behav. 66: 449-458.
32. Howard, R.D. (1978). The evolution of mating strategies in bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana. - Evolution 32: 850-871.
33. Isbell, L.A. (1991). Contest and scramble competition: patterns of female aggression and ranging behaviour among primates. - Behav. Ecol. 2: 143-155.
34. Jennions, M.D. & Backwell, P.R.Y. (1996). Residency and size affect fight duration and outcome in the fiddler crab Uca annulipes. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 57: 293-306.
35. Kålås, J.A., Fiske, P. & Sæther, S.A. (1995). The effect of mating probability on risk taking: an experimental study in lekking great snipe. - Am. Nat. 146: 59-7.1.
36. Kirkton, S.D. & Harrison, J.F. (2006). Ontogeny of locomotory behaviour in the American locust, Schistocerca americana: from marathoner to broad jumper. - Anim. Behav. 71 : 925-931.
37. Kokko, H., Mackenzie, A., Reynolds, J.D., Lindström, J. & Sutherland, WJ. (1999). Measures of inequality are not equal. - Am. Nat. 72: 358-382.
38. Kreiter, N. & Wise, D.H. (1996). Age-related changes in movement patterns in the fishing spider, Dolomedes triton (Araneae, Pisauridae). - J. Arachnol. 24: 24-33.
39. Lindström, K. & Pampoulie, C. (2005). Effects of resource holding potential and resource value on tenure at nest sites in sand gobies. -Behav. Ecol. 16: 70-74.
40. Lott, D.F. (1991). Intraspecific variation in the social systems of wild vertebrates. - Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
41. Martín, J. & López, P. (2000). Social status of male Iberian rock lizards (Lacerta monticola) influences their activity patterns during the mating season. - Can. J. Zool. 78: 1105-1109.
42. Maynard Smith, J. & Parker, G.A. (1976). The logic of asymmetric contests. - Anim. Behav. 24: 159-175.
43. Miranda, O. & Kong, I. (1970). El camarón de mar en Antofagasta (Rhynchocinetes typus, MilneEdwards, 1837) Crustacea, Decapoda, Rhynchocinetidae. - Biol. Pesq. 4: 4.1-63.
44. Monaghan, P. & Metcalfe, N.B. (1985). Group foraging in wild brown hares: effects of resource distribution and social status. - Anim. Behav. 33: 993-999.
45. Morrell, L.J., Lindström, J. & Ruxton, G.D. (2005). Why are small males aggressive? - Proc. R. Soc. B. 272: 1235-1241.
46. Neff, B.D., Fu, P. & Gross, M.R. (2003). Sperm, investment and alternative mating tactics in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). - Behav. Ecol. 14: 634-641.
47. Parker, G.A. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behavior. - J. Theor. Biol. 47: 223-242.
48. Parker, G.A. & Sutherland, W.J. (1986). Ideal free distributions when competitors differ in competitive ability: phenotype-limited ideal free models. - Anim. Behav. 34: 1222-1242.
49. Perry, G., Levering, K., Girard, I. & Garland, T. Jr. (2004). Locomotor performance and social dominance in male Anolis cristatellus. - Anim. Behav. 67: 37-47.
50. Qvarnström, A. & Forsgren, E. (1998). Should females prefer dominant males? - Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 498-501.
51. Rands, S.A., Pettifor, R.A., Rowcliffe, J.M. & Cowlishaw, G. (2006). Social foraging and dominance relationships: the effects of socially mediated interference. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 60: 572-581.
52. Robson, M.A. & Miles, D.B. (2000). Locomotor performance and dominance in male tree lizards, Urosaurus ornatus. - Funct. Ecol. 14: 338-344.
53. Stahl, J., Tolsma, PH., Loonen, M.J.J.E. & Drent, R.H. (2001). Subordinates explore but dominants profit: resource competition in high Arctic barnacle goose flocks. - Anim. Behav. 61: 257-264.
54. Stillman, R.A., Poole, A.E., Goss-Custard, J.D., Caldow, R.W.G., Yates, M.G. & Triplet, P. (2002). Predicting the strength of interference more quickly using behaviour-based models. - J. Anim. Ecol. 71: 532-541.
55. Taborsky, M., Hudde, B. & Wirtz, P. (1987). Reproductive behaviour and ecology of Symphodus (Crenilabrus) ocellatus, a european wrasse with four types of male behaviour. - Behaviour 102: 82-118.
56. Temeles, E.J. (1989). The effect of prey consumption on territorial defense by harriers: differential responses to neighbors versus floaters. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24: 239-243.
57. Theimer, T.C. (1987). The effect of seed dispersion on the foraging success of dominant and subordinate dark-eyed juncos, Junco hyemalis. - Anim. Behav. 35: 1883-1890.
58. Thiel, M. & Correa, C. (2004). Female rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus mate in rapid succession up a male dominance hierarchy. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57: 62-68.
59. Thiel, M. & Hinojosa, I. (2003). Mating behavior of female rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea) - indication for convience polyandry and cryptic female choice. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 55: 113-121.
60. Vahl, W.K., Lok, T., van der Meer, J., Piersma, T. & Weissing, F.J. (2005). Spatial clumping of food and social dominance affect interference among ruddy turnstones. -Behav. Ecol. 16: 834-844.
61. Van Son, T.C. & Thiel, M. (2006). Mating behaviour of male rock shrimp, Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea): effect of recent mating history and predation risk. - Anim. Behav. 71: 61-70.
62. Vásquez, J. & Castilla, J. (1982). Areas de reclutamiento y estructura poblacional de Rhynchocinetes typus Milne Edwards, 1837 (Crustacea Rhynchocinetidae), en Chile Central. - Invest. Mar., Valparaíso 10: 1-14.