Prioritization of e-Government strategies using a SWOT-AHP analysis: The case of Turkey

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 284-298

  Kahraman, Cengiz ^a   Demirel, Nihan Çetin ^b   Demirel, Tufan ^b  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; e Government; Sensitivity analysis; Strategic planning; SWOT

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547568567     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000679     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. AKMAN I, YAZICI A and ARIFOGLU A (2002) E-Government: Turkey profile. Proceedings of 2nd International European Conference on e-Government, pp 27-39, MCIL, Oxford, UK.
2. AKMAN I, YAZICI A, MISHRA A and ARIFOGLU A (2005) E-Government: a global view and an emprical evaluation of some attributes of citizens. Government Information Quarterly 22(2), 239-257.
3. ANANDA J and HERATH G (2003) The use of Analytic Hierarchy Process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning. Forest Policy and Economics 5(1), 13-26.
4. BERTOLINI M, BRAGLIA M and CARMIGNANI G (2006) Application of the AHP methodology in making a proposal for a public work contract. International Journal of Project Management 24(5), 422-430.
5. BINBASIOGLU M and WINSTON E (2003) Knowledge-based management support: an application to the IS change agent role problem. Expert Systems with Applications 25(4), 517-532.
6. CAIRNS G, WRIGHT G, BRADFIELD R, VAN DER HEIJDEN K and BURT G (2004) Exploring e-government futures through the application of scenario planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 71(3), 217-238.
7. CARTER L and BéLANGER F (2005) The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors, Information Systems Journal 15(1), 5-25.
8. CHEN YC and GANT J (2001) Transforming local e-government services: the use of application service providers. Government Information Quarterly 18(4), 343-355.
9. DAVID FR (2004) Strategic Management. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
10. DEARSTYNE BW (2001) E-business, e-government and information proficiency. Information Management Journal 34(4), 16.
11. EVANS D and YEN DC (2005) E-government: an analysis for implementation: framework for understanding cultural and social impact. Government Information Quarterly 22(3), 354-373.
12. GAULD R and GOLDFINCH S (2006) Dangerous Enthusiasms: E-Government, Computer Failure and Information Systems Development. Otago University Press, Otago, New Zealand.
13. GIL-GARCIA JR and PARDO TA (2005) E-government success factors: mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly 22(2), 187-216.
14. GIUDICI G and PALEARI S (2000) The provision of finance to innovation: a survey conducted among Italian technology-based small firms. Small Business Economics 14(1), 37-53.
15. GUPTA MP and JANA D (2003) E-government evaluation: a framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly 20(4), 365-387.
16. HACKBARTH G and KETTINGER WJ (2000) Building an e-business strategy. Information Systems Management 17(33), 78-93.
17. HILL T and WESTBROOK R (1997) SWOT Analysis: it's time for a product recall. Long Range Planning 30(1), 46-52.
18. IRANI Z, LOVE PED, ELLIMAN T, JONES S and THEMISTOCLEOUS M (2005) Evaluating e-government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities. Information Systems Journal 15(1), 61-82.
19. KAHIN B and NESSON C (Eds) (1997) Borders In Cyberspace: Information Policy and the Global Information Infrastructure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. KAHRAMAN C, CEBECI U and RUAN D (2004) Multi-attribute comparison ofcatering service companies using fuzzy AHP: the case of Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics 87(2), 171-184.
21. KAYLOR C, DESHAZO R and VAN ECK D (2001) Gauging e-government: a report on implementing services among American cities. Government Information Quarterly 18(4), 293-307.
22. KURTTILA M, PESONEN M, KANGAS J and KAJANUS M (2000) Utilzing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) In SWOT analysis - a hybrid method and its application to a forecast-certification case. Forecast Policy and Economics 1(1), 41-52.
23. LAYNE K and LEE J (2001) Developing fully functional E-government: a four stage model. Government Information Quarterly 18(2), 122-136.
24. LULING D (2001) Taking it online: anyway, anyplace, anytime Tennessee anytime. Journal of Government Financial Management 50(2), 42-49.
25. MAHRER H and KRIMMER R (2005) Towards the enhancement of e-democracy: Identifying the notion of the 'middleman paradox'. Information Systems Journal 15(1), 27-42.
26. MARTIN A (2002) The globalisation of Welsh business through the development of managerial competencies and behavioural attitudes in e-business to e-business. Managerial Auditing Journal 17(6), 333-337.
27. MOON MJ and NORRIS DF (2005) Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Info Systems J 15(1), 43-60.
28. NI AY and HO ATK (2005) Challenges In e-government development: lessons from two information kiosk projects. Government Information Quarterly 22(1), 58-74.
29. REDDICK CG (2004) A two-stage model of e-government growth: theories and empirical evidence for U.S. cities. Government Information Quarterly 21(1), 51-64.
30. SAATY TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15(3), 234-281.
31. SAATY TL (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
32. SAATY TL (1993) The analytic hierarchy process: a 1993 overview. Central European journal of Operation Research and Economics 2(2), 119-137.
33. SAATY TL and VARGAS LG (2001) Models, Methods, Concepts and Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
34. SEIFERT JW (2003) CRS Report RL31057, A Primer on E-Government: Sectors, Stages, Opportunities, and Challenges of Online Governance.
35. SHRESTHA RK, ALAVALAPATI JRR and KALMBACHER RS (2004) Exploring the potential for silvopasture adoption in south-central Florida: an application of SWOT-AHP method. Agricultural Systems 81(1), 185-199.
36. SILCOCK R (2001) What is e-government? Parliamentary Affairs 54(1), 88-101.
37. STREJCEK G and THEIL M (2002) Technology push, legislation pull? E-government in the European Union. Decision Support Systems 34(3), 305-313.
38. TERRADOS J, ALMONACID G and HONTORIA L (2007) Regional energy planning through SWOT analysis and strategic planning tools: Impact on renewables development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 11(6), 1275-1287.
39. TORRES L, PINA V and ACERETE B (2005) E-government developments on delivering public services among EU cities. Government Information Quarterly 22(2), 217-238.
40. WEIHRICH H (1982) The TOWS matrix-a tool for situation analysis. Long Range Planning 15(2), 54-66.
41. WHITSON TL and DAVIS L (2001) Best practices in electronic government: comprehensive electronic information dissemination for science and technology. Government Information Quarterly 18(2), 79-91.
42. YURDAKUL M (2004) AHP as a strategic decision-making tool to justify machine tool selection. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 146(3), 365-376.
43. http://www.edevlet.net/raporveyayinlar/eTurkiyeRaporu.pdf.
44. http://www.edevlet.net/raporveyayinlar/TUSIADeTurkiye.pdf.
45. http://www.edevlet.net/raporveyayinlar/e-devlet_mayis_2001.pdf.
46. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/60/60/2502539.pdf.
47. http://www.investinestonia.com/pdf/Central Europe egov.pdf.
48. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN/UNPAN021547.pdf.