Endogeneity and empirical accounting research

European Accounting Review

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 207-215

  Larcker, David F ^a   Rusticus, Tjomme O ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547531609     PISSN: 09638180     EISSN: 14684497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638180701269905     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Chenhall, R. H. and Moers, F. The issue of endogeneity within theory-based, quantitative management accounting research. European Accounting Review, 16:1, pp. 173-195.
2. Core, J. E. and Guay, W. R. (1999) The use of equity grants to manage optimal equity incentive levels. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28, pp. 151-184.
3. Demsetz, H. and Lehn, K. (1985) The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93, pp. 1155-1177.
4. Hanlon, M. (2003) Are executive stock options associated with future earnings?. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36, pp. 3-43.
5. Himmelberg, C. P. (1999) Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53, pp. 353-384.
6. Ittner, C. D. (2003) The structure and performance consequences of equity grants to employees of new economy firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 34, pp. 89-127.
7. McConnell, J. J. and Servaes, H. (1990) Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, 45, pp. 223-255.
8. Morck, R. (1988) Management ownership and market value. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, pp. 293-315.
9. Zhou, X. (2001) Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance: Comment. Journal of Financial Economics, 62, pp. 559-571.