Discriminatory European union membership and the redistribution of enlargement gains

Journal of Conflict Resolution

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 568-587

  Plümper, Thomas ^a   Schneider, Christina J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Discriminatory membership; Eastern enlargement; EU enlargement; European Union

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547472526     PISSN: 00220027     EISSN: 15528766     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022002707302793     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alesina, Alberto, Iganzi Angeloni, and Frederico Etro. 2005. International unions. American Economic Review 95: 602-15.
2. Austrian Government. 2000 a. Information note: The free movement of persons in the context of enlargement. Additional facts on the Austrian situation relating to the commission's information note of April 17, 2000. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
3. _. 2000b. Österreich Neu Regieren. FP-VP Regierungsprogramm.
4. Badinger, Harald. 2005. Growth effects of economic integration: Evidence from the member states. Review of World Economics 141: 50-78.
5. Baldwin, Richard E., Joseph F. Francois, and Richard Portes. 1997. The costs and benefits of Eastern enlargement: The impact on the EU and Central Europe. Economic Policy 12: 126-76.
6. Brou, Daniel, and Michele Ruta. 2004. A positive explanation of EU enlargement. EUI working paper no. 30. European University Institute, Florence, Italy.
7. Donges, Jrgen B. 1983. From the six to the ten and beyond: The European Community at the crossroad. Kieler Arbeitspapiere. Kiel, Germany: Institut fr Weltwirtschaft.
8. EU Commission. 2001. Information note: The free movement of workers in the context of enlargement. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
9. _. 2003. Budgetary Vade-Mekum. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
10. EU Parliament. 1999. Livre Blanc Sur L'largissement De L'Union Europenne, vol. 2. Rapport Sur Les Positions Des tats Membres Et Des tats Candidats Sur L'largissement De L'Union Europenne [White book on the enlargement of the European Union, vol. 2. Report of the positions of the EU member states and the candidate states about the enlargement of the European Union]. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
11. Eurostat online. n.d. http://www.eds-destatis.de/ (accessed in April 2006 ).
12. Financial Times. 1984. Greece clarifies stand on wine deal. December 8, p. 2.
13. _. 1985 a. EEC budget linked to entry talks. January 17, p. 24.
14. _. 1985 b. EEC enlargement talks deadline threatened. January 28, p. 1.
15. Fischer, Joschka. 1998. Interview. In Wir wollen keine Soli tanzen, edited by Der Spiegel, 84-87. November 23.
16. Hausken, Kjell, Walter Mattli, and Thomas Plmper. 2006. Widening versus deepening of international unions. Working paper. Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=953135 (accessed on April 26, 2007 ).
17. Haveman, John. n.d. International Trade Data. http://macalester.edu/ research/economics/PAGE/HAVEMAN/Trade.Resources/TradeData.html (accessed in June 2004 ).
18. Henrekson, Magnus, Johan Torstensson, and Rasha Torstensson. 1997. Growth effects of European integration. European Economic Review 41: 1537-57.
19. International Monetary Fund. n.d. Direction of trade statistics. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
20. Kok, Wim. 2001. Interview. In Die Slowakei stimmt fr EU-bergangsfristen. Dnemark und Niederlande gewhren volle Freizgigkeit [Slovakia accepts transitional periods after EU accession. Denmark and the Netherlands grant freedom of movement], edited by Der Standard, June 28. http://www.ccc-net.at (accessed on May 6, 2003 ).
21. Mattli, Walter, and Thomas Plmper. 2002. The demand-side politics of EU enlargement: Democracy and the application for EU membership. Journal of European Public Policy 9: 550-74.
22. _. 2004. The internal value of external options: On the impact of EU conditionality on regulatory reforms in transition countries. European Union Politics 5: 307-30.
23. Mayhew, Alan. 2000. Enlargement of the European Union: An analysis of the negotiations with the Central and Eastern European candidate countries. SEI working paper no. 39. Sussex European Institute, United Kingdom.
24. Moravcsik, Andrew, and Anna M. Vachudova, 2003. National interests, state power, and EU enlargement. East European Politics and Societies 17: 42-57.
25. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Dataset online. n.d. http://www.oecd.org/statistics/ (accessed in April 2006 ).
26. Persson, Gran. 1999. Speech at the Swedish Institute of International Affairs. In Livre Blanc Sur L'largissement De L'Union Europenne, vol. 2. Rapport Sur Les Positions Des tats Membres Et Des tats Candidats Sur L'largissement De L'Union Europenne [White book about the enlargement of the European Union, vol. 2. Report of the positions of the EU member states and the candidate states about the enlargement of the European Union], edited by EU Parliament. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/enlargement/index2_fr.htm (accessed on April 26, 2007).
27. Plmper, Thomas, Christina J. Schneider, and Vera E. Troeger. 2006. The politics of EU Eastern enlargement: Evidence from a Heckman selection model. British Journal of Political Science 36: 17-38.
28. Preston, Christopher. 1997. Enlargement integration in the European Union. London: Routledge.
29. Report on External Affairs. 2001. Auenpolitischer Bericht der Bundesministerin fr auswrtige Angelegenheiten [Report of the minister of foreign affairs]. Vienna, Austria: Manz.
30. Sandler, Todd. 1993. The economic theory of alliances: A survey. Journal of Conflict Resolution 37: 446-83.
31. _. 1999. Alliance formation, alliance expansion, and the core. Journal of Conflict Resolution 43: 727-47.
32. Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2001. The community trap: Liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the Eastern enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55: 47-80.
33. _. 2002. Liberal community and enlargement: An event history analysis. Journal of European Public Policy 9: 598-626.
34. _. 2003. The EU, NATO and the integration of Europe: Rules and rhetoric. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Schneider, Christina J. 2006. Differenzierte Mitgliedschaft und die EU-Osterweiterung: Das Beispiel der Arbeitnehmerfreizgigkeit [Differentiated membership and Eastern enlargement: The example of the free movement of workers]. Swiss Political Science Review 12: 67-99.
36. _. Forthcoming. Enlargement processes and distributional conflicts: The politics of discriminatory membership in the European Union. Public Choice.
37. Schrder, Gerhard. 2000. Speech at the regional conference in Oberpfalz, December 18. Bulletin der Bundesregierung, no. 90-1.
38. _. 2001. Verantwortung fr Europa. SPD-Leitantrag zum SPD-Parteitag [Responsibility for Europe. SPD keynote speech at the SPD-Party congress]. Nrnberg, Germany, November 22.
39. Sjursen, Helen. 2002. Why expand? The question of legitimacy and justification in the EU's enlargement policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 40: 491-513.
40. Treaty of Accession. Various years. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.