Two-stage classifier for diagnosis of hypertension type

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4345 LNBI, Issue , 2006, Pages 433-440

  Wozniak, Michal ^a  

^a WROCLAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING; BLOOD PRESSURE; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSIS;

HYPERTENSION; INDUCTIVE LEARNING APPROACH; TWO-STAGE CLASSIFIER;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 34547455416     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/11946465_39     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Blinowska A. et al., Bayesian Statistics as Applied to Hypertension Diagnosis, IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Eng., vol. 38, no. 7, July 1991, pp. 699-706.
2. Burduk R., Case of Fuzzy Loss Function in Multistage Recognition Algorithm, Journal of Medical Informatics & Technologies, vol. 5, 2003, pp. MI 107-112.
3. Cohen W. W., Fast Effective Rule Induction, Proc. of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning, Tahoe City, pp.115-123.
4. Freund Y., Schapire R.E., A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and application to boosting, Journal of Computer and System Science, 55(1), 1997, pp. 119-139.
5. Freund Y., Schapire R.E., Experiments with a New Boosting Algorithm, Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, 1996, pp. 148-156.
6. Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J., The Elements of Statistical Learning. Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Springer Series in Statistics, Springer Verlag, New York 2001.
7. Jain A.K., Duin P.W., Mao J., Statistical Pattern Recognition: A Review, IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol 22., No. 1, January 2000, pp. 4-37.
8. Meir R. and Ratsch G. An introduction to boosting and leveraging, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2600, Springer, 2003, pp. 119-184.
9. Melville P., Mooney R., Constructing diverse classifier ensembles using artificial training examples, Proc. of 18th Intl. Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence, Acapulco, Mexico, August 2003, pp. 505-510.
10. Mitchell T., Machine Learning, McGraw Hill, 1997.
11. Opitz D., Maclin R., Popular Ensemble Methods: An Empirical Study, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11 (1999), pp. 169-198
12. Quinlan J.R., C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
13. Quinlan J.R., Bagging, Boosting, and C4.5, Proc. AAAI 96 and IAAI 96 conferences, vol. 1, Portland, Oregon, August 4-8, 1996, pp. 725-230.
14. Schapire R. E., The boosting approach to machine learning: An overview. Proc. Of MSRI Workshop on Nonlinear Estimation and Classification, Berkeley, CA, 2001.
15. Shapire R.E., The Strength of Weak Learnability, Machine Learning, no. 5, 1990, pp. 197-227.
16. Schapire R.E., A Brief Introduction to Boosting, Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1999.
17. Witten I.H., Frank E., Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations, Morgan Kaufmann Pub., 2000.
18. Wozniak M., Boosted decision trees for diagnosis type of hypertension, Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics, vol. 3745, Springer, 2005, pp. 223-230.