Women's attitudes towards mechanisms of action of family planning methods: Survey in primary health centres in Pamplona, Spain

BMC Women's Health

Volumn 7, Issue , 2007, Pages

  de Irala, Jokin ^a   del Burgo, Cristina L ^a   de Fez, Carmen M ^a   Arredondo, Jorge ^a   Mikolajczyk, Rafael T ^b   Stanford, Joseph B ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABORTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; FEMALE FERTILITY; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MARRIAGE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PREVALENCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPAIN; WOMEN'S HEALTH; ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; PREGNANCY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; STATISTICS; URBAN POPULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; PREGNANCY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPAIN; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 34547409299     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726874     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-7-10     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. World Health Organization Improving access to quality care in family planning: Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use 2004 http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/mec/mec.pdf
2. Larimore WL Stanford JB Postfertilization effects of oral contraceptives and their relationship to informed consent Arch Fam Med 2000 9 2 126-133 10.1001/archfami.9.2.126 10693729
3. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Hormonal contraception: Recent advances and controversies Fertil Steril 2004 82 Suppl 1 S26-32 15363690
4. Frye CA An overview of oral contraceptives: Mechanism of action and clinical use Neurology 2006 66 6 Suppl 3 S29-36 16567739
5. Wertheimer RE Emergency postcoital contraception Am Fam Physician 2000 62 10 2287-2292 11126855
6. Wellbery C Emergency contraception Arch Fam Med 2000 9 7 642-646 10.1001/ archfami.9.7.642 10910312
7. Kahlenborn C Stanford JB Larimore WL Postfertilization effect of hormonal emergency contraception Ann Pharmacother 2002 36 3 465-470 10.1345/aph.1A344 11895061
8. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Emergency oral contraception. Number 25, March 2001. (Replace Practice Pattern Number 3, December 1996). American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002 78 2 191 198 10.1016/ S0020-7292(02)00198-4 12360907
9. Trussell J Ellertson C Stewart F Raymond EG Shochet T The role of emergency contraception Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004 190 4 Suppl S30-38 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.063 15105796
10. Lahteenmaki P Rauramo I Backman T The levonorgestrel intrauterine system in contraception Steroids 2000 65 10-11 693-697 10.1016/ S0039-128X(00)00176-8 11108878
11. Stanford JB Mikolajczyk RT Mechanisms of action of intrauterine devices: update and estimation of postfertilization effects Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002 187 6 1699-1708 10.1067/mob.2002.128091 12501086
12. French R Van Vliet H Cowan F Mansour D Morris S Hughes D Robinson A Proctor T Summerbell C Logan S Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004 3 CD001776
13. Mikolajczyk M Stanford JB Levonorgestrel emergency contraception: A joint analysis of effectiveness and mechanism of action Fertil Steril 2007 17320877
14. Romo LF Berenson AB Segars A Sociocultural and religious influences on the normative contraceptive practices of Latino women in the United States Contraception 2004 69 219-225 10.1016/j.contraception.2003.10.011 14969670
15. Dye HM Stanford JB Alder SC Kim HS Murphy PA Women and postfertilization effects of birth control: Consistency of beliefs, intentions and reported use BMC Womens Health 2005 5 11 1325031 16313677 10.1186/ 1472-6874-5-11
16. Mikolajczyk RT Stanford JB Rauchfuss M Factors influencing the choice to use modern natural family planning Contraception 2003 67 4 253-258 10.1016/S0010-7824(02)00490-0 12684143
17. Oddens BJ Lehert P Determinants of contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Great Britain and Germany. I: Demographic factors J Biosoc Sci 1997 29 4 415-435 10.1017/S002193209700415X 9881145
18. Oddens BJ Determinants of contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Great Britain and Germany. II: Psychological factors J Biosoc Sci 1997 29 4 437-470 10.1017/S0021932097004379 9881146
19. Riphagen FE Lehert P A survey of contraception in five west European countries J Biosoc Sci 1989 21 1 23-46 2925698
20. Oddens BJ Contraceptive use and attitudes in Italy 1993 Hum Reprod 1996 11 3 533-539 8671261
21. Oddens BJ Milsom I Contraceptive practice and attitudes in Sweden 1994 Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996 75 10 932-940 9003096
22. Hosmer D Lemeshow S Applied Logistic Regression N York: Willey 2 2000 10886529
23. Lopez del Burgo C Lopez de Fez C Herranz Barbero A Saiz Mendiguren R de Irala J Knowledge of the mechanisms of action of birth control methods Prog Obstet Ginecol 2006 49 8 424-433
24. Gasman N Blandon MM Crane BB Abortion, social inequity, and women's health: Obstetrician-gynecologists as agents of change International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2006 94 3 310-316 10.1016/ j.ijgo.2006.04.018
25. Hessini L Global progress in abortion advocacy and policy: An assessment of the decade since ICPD Reprod Health Matters 2005 13 25 88-100 10.1016/ S0968-8080(05)25168-6 16035601
26. Gould H Ellertson C Corona G Knowledge and attitudes about the differences between emergency contraception and medical abortion among middle-class women and men of reproductive age in Mexico City Contraception 2002 66 6 417-426 10.1016/S0010-7824(02)00410-9 12499034
27. Jackson R Schwarz EB Freedman L Darney P Knowledge and willingness to use emergency contraception among low-income post-partum women Contraception 2000 61 6 351-357 10.1016/S0010-7824(00)00117-7 10958877
28. Spinnato JA Informed consent and the redefining of conception: A decision ill-conceived? J Matern Fetal Med 1998 7 6 264-268 10.1002/ (SICI)1520-6661(199811/12)7:6<264::AID-MFM2>3.0.CO;2-M 9848690
29. Spinnato JA 2nd Informed consent: Are we there? J Perinatol 1999 19 6 Pt 1 401-402 10.1038/sj.jp.7200249 10685267
30. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Using preimplantation embryos for research. ACOG Comittee Opinion No. 347. Obstet Gynecol 2006 108 1305-17 http://www.acog.org/from_home/ publications/ethics/co347.pdf 17077265
31. Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) Censo de Población y Viviendas 2001 http://www.ine.es/censo2001/censo2001.htm
32. Grady WR Klepinger DH Nelson-Wally A Contraceptive characteristics: The perceptions and priorities of men and women Fam Plann Perspect 1999 31 4 168-175 10.2307/2991589 10435215
33. Steiner MJ Dalebout S Condon S Dominik R Trussell J Understanding risk: a randomized controlled trial of communicating contraceptive effectiveness Obstet Gynecol 2003 102 4 709-717 10.1016/ S0029-7844(03)00662-8 14551000
34. Trussell J Jordan B Mechanism of action of emergency contraceptive pills Contraception 2006 74 2 87-89 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.03.028 16860044
35. Mikolajczyk RT Stanford JB The empirical and ethical questions of induced versus natural losses of preimplantation embryos Contraception 2007 in press 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.12.006 17434024