Women and postfertilization effects of birth control: Consistency of beliefs, intentions and reported use

BMC Women's Health

Volumn 5, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Dye, Huong ^a   Stanford, Joseph B ^a   Alder, Stephen C ^a   Kim, Han S ^a   Murphy, Patricia A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GESTAGEN; MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ABORTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BIRTH CONTROL; CONDOM; CONTRACEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PRENATAL CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; UNITED STATES;

EID: 28844501638     PISSN: 14726874     EISSN: 14726874     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-5-11     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Moreau C, Bouyer J, Goulard H, Bajos N: The remaining barriers to the use of emergency contraception: perception of pregnancy risk by women undergoing induced abortions. Contraception 2005, 71(3):202-207.
2. Hogan DP, Sun R, Cornwell GT: Sexual and fertility behaviors of American females aged 15-19 years: 1985, 1990, and 1995. Am J Public-Health 2000, 90(9):1421-1425.
3. Villarruel AM, Jemmott JB, 3rd, Jernmott LS, Ronis DL: Predictors of sexual intercourse and condom use intentions among Spanish-dominant Latino youth: a test of the planned behavior theory. Nurs Res 2004, 53(3):172-181.
4. Craig DM, Wade KE, Allison KR, Irving HM, Williams JI, Hlibka CM: Factors predictive of adolescents' intentions to use birth control pills, condoms, and birth control pills in combination with condoms. Can J Public Health 2000, 91(5):361-365.
5. Libbus K: Women's beliefs concerning condom acquisition and use. Public Health Nurs 1995, 12(5):341-347.
6. Jemmott JB, 3rd, Jemmott LS, Hacker CI: Predicting intentions to use condoms among African-American adolescents: the theory of planned behavior as a model of HIV risk-associated behavior. Ethn Dis 1992, 2(4):371-380.
7. Weisman CS, Plichta S, Nathanson CA, Chase GA, Ensminger ME, Robinson JC: Adolescent women's contraceptive decision making. J Health Soc Behav 1991, 32(2):130-144.
8. Spinnato JA: Informed consent and the redefining of conception: a decision ill- conceived? J Matern Fetal Med 1998, 7(6):264-268.
9. Grimes DA, Cook RJ: Mifepristone (RU 486) - an abortifacient to prevent abortion? N Engl J Med 1992, 327(15):1088-1089.
10. Moore KL, Persaud TVN: Before We are born: Essentials of Embryology and Birth Defects, 5th edn. Philadelphia, P.A.: W. B. Saunders Company; 1998.
11. Zogby J: American Values. Volume V. In. Utica, New York: Zogby International; 2000.
12. Larimore WL, Stanford JB, Kahlenborn C: Does pregnancy begin at fertilization? Fam Med 2004, 36(10):690-691; author reply 691.
13. Romo LF, Berenson AB, Wu ZH: The role of misconceptions on Latino women's acceptance of emergency contraceptive pills. Contraception 2004, 69(3):227-235.
14. Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK: Health behavior and health education: theory, research, practice, 3rd edn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.; 2002.
15. Albarracin D, Johnson BT, Fishbein M, Muellerleile PA: Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 2001, 127(1):142-161.
16. Noone J: Finding the best fit: a grounded theory of contraceptive decision making in women. Nurs Forum 2004, 39(4):13-24.
17. Yanda K, Smith SV, Rosenfield A: Reproductive health and human rights. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003, 82(3):275-283.
18. Hessini L: Global progress in abortion advocacy and policy: an assessment of the decade since ICPD. Reprod Health Matters 2005, 13(25):88-100.
19. Dolian G, Ludicke F, Katchatrian N, Campana A, Morabia A: Contraception and induced abortion in Armenia: a critical need for family planning programs in eastern Europe. Am J Public Health 1998, 88(5):803-805.
20. Kovacs L: From abortion to contraception in Europe. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 1999, 4(4):229-236.
21. Grady WR, Klepinger DH, Nelson-Wally A: Contraceptive characteristics: the perceptions and priorities of men and women. Fam Plann Perspect 1999, 31(4):168-175.
22. Kost K, Forrest JD, Harlap S: Comparing the health risks and benefits of contraceptive choices. Fam Plann Perspect 1991, 23(2):54-61.
23. Lethbridge DJ: Choosing and using contraception: toward a theory of women's contraceptive self-care. Nurs Res 1991, 40(5):276-280.
24. Wall EM: Valued outcomes in the selection of a contraceptive method. West J Med 1984, 141(3):335-338.
25. Falvo DR: Effective patient education: a guide to increased compliance, 3rd edn. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2004.
26. Mazur DJ: Shared decision making in the patient-physician relationship. Tampa: American College of Physician Executives; 2001.
27. Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart F, Stewart GK, Kowal D, Guest F, Cates W, Jr., Policar MS: CAntraceptive technology. 18th revised edition, 18 edn. New York; 2004.
28. Croxatto HB, Devoto L, Durand M, Ezcurra E, Larrea F, Nagle C, Ortiz ME, Vantman D, Vega M, von Hertzen H: Mechanism of action of hormonal preparations used for emergency contraception: a review of the literature. Contraception 2001, 63(3):111-121.
29. Larimore WL, Stanford JB: Postfertilization effects of oral contraceptives and their relationship to informed consent. Arch Fam Med 2000, 9(2):126-133.
30. Spinnato JA: Mechanism of action of intrauterine contraceptive devices and its relation to informed consent. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997, 176(3):503-506.
31. Kahlenborn C, Stanford JB, Larimore WL: Postfertilization effect of hormonal emergency contraception. Ann Pharmacother 2002, 36(3):465-470.
32. Stanford JB, Mikolajczyk RT: Mechanisms of action of intrauterine devices: update and estimation of postfertilization effects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002, 187(6):1699-1708.
33. Mikolajczyk RT, Stanford JB: False risk attribution results in misleading assessment of the relationship between suppression of ovulation and the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen for emergency contraception. Contraception 2003, 67(4):333-335; author reply 335-337.