Knowledge of the mechanisms of action of birth control methods;Conocimiento de los mecanismos de acción de los métodos de planificación familiar

Progresos en Obstetricia y Ginecologia

Volumn 49, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 424-433

  Del Burgo, Cristina López ^a   De Fez, Carmen Marina López ^b   Barbero, Ana Herranz ^a   Mendiguren, Ramón Saiz ^a   De Irala, Jokin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^b Centro de Salud Ansoáin   (Spain)

Author keywords

Contraception; Family planning; Knowledge; Mechanism of action; Pill

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248657290     PISSN: 03045013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-5013(06)72631-0     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Spinnato JA. Mechanism of action of intrauterine contraceptive devices and its relation to informed consent. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176:503-6.
2. Larimore WL, Stanford JB. Postfertilization effects of oral contraceptives and their relationship to informed consent. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:126-33.
3. Upadhyay UD. Elección informada en la planificatión familiar: cómo ayudar a la gente a decidir. Population Reports, Serie J, n.o 50. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Population Information Program; 2001.
4. Trussell J, Ellertson C, Stewart F, Raymond E, Shochet T. The role of emergency contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190 Suppl 1:30-8.
5. Drazen JM, Green MF, Wood AJJ. The FDA, politics and Plan D [letter]. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2414.
6. Fisher W, Doroditsky R, Morris B. The 2002 Canadian contraception study (I). J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004;26:580-90.
7. Freeman S. Nondaily hormonal contraception: considerations in contraceptive choosing and patient counselling. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2004;16:226-38.
8. Gaudet L, Kives S, Hahn P, Reid R. What women believe about oral contraceptives and the effect of counselling. Contraception. 2004;69:31-6.
9. Organizatión Mundial de la Salud. Improving access to quality care in family planning: Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. Genève: QMS; 2004. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/ publications/MEC_3/mec.pdf
10. Larimore WL, Stanford JB, Kahlenborn C. Does pregnancy begin at fertilization? [letter]. Fam Med. 2004;36:690-1.
11. Mikolajczyk RT, Stanford JB. Mode of action: an issue for informed consent in family planning. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17 Abstract Book 1:47.
12. Romo L, Berenson A, Wu H. The role of misconceptions on Latino women's acceptance of emergency contraceptive pills. Contraception. 2004;69:227-35.
13. Dye HM, Stanford JB, Alder SC, Kim HS, Murphy PA. Women and postfertilization effects of birth control: consistency of beliefs, intentions and reported use. BMC Women's Health. 2005;28:5-11.
14. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Hormonal contraception: recent advances and controversies. Fertil Steril. 2004;82 Suppl 1:26-32.
15. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynaecology. Emergency oral contraception. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002;78:191-8.
16. Kahlenborn C, Standford JB, Larimore WL. Postfertilization effect of hormonal emergency contraception. Ann Pharmacother. 2002;36:465-70.
17. Wellbery C. Emergency contraception. Arch Fam Med. 2000; 9:642-6.
18. Wertheimer RE. Emergency postcoital contraception. Am Fam Physician. 2000;62:2287-92.
19. Lähteenmäki P, Rauramo I, Backman T. The levonorgestrel intrautcrine system in contraception. Steroids. 2000;65:693-7.
20. Stanford JB, Mikolajczyk R. Mechanisms of action of intrauterine devices: update and estimation of postfertilization effects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1699-708.
21. French R, Cowan F, Mansour D, Morris S, Hughes D, Robinson A, et al. Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (lUSs), versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004, Issue 3, CD001776.
22. Could H, Ellertson C, Corona G. Knowledge and attitudes about differences between emergency contraception and medical abortion among middle-class women and men of reproductive age in Mexico City. Contraception. 2002;66:417-26.
23. Chuang C, Freund K. Emergency contraception knowledge among women in a Boston community. Contraception. 2005; 71:157-60.
24. Uzuner A, Unalan P, Akman M, Cifcili S, Tuncer I, Coban E, et al. Providers' knowledge of, attitude to and practice of emergency contraception. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2005;10:43-50.
25. Wallace JL, Wu J, Weinstein J, Gorenflo DW, Fetters MD. Emergency contraception: knowledge and attitudes of family medicine providers. Fam Med. 2004;36:4:417-22.
26. Abbott J, Feldbaus KM, Houry D, Lowenstein SR. Emergency contraception: what do our patients know? Ann Emerg Med. 2004;43:376-81.
27. Sherman CA, Harvey SM, Beckman LJ, Petitti DB. Emergency contraception: knowledge and attitudes of health care providers in a health maintenance organization. Women's Health Issues. 2001;11:448-57.
28. Instituto de Estadística de Navarra (IEN). Encuesta de condiciones de vida de la población navarra en 2003. Disponible en: http://www.cfnavarra.es/estadistica
29. Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). Censo de Población y Viviendas 2001. Disponible en: http://www.ine.es/censo2001/censo2001.htm