Spatial input device structure and bimanual object manipulation in virtual environments

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 51-60

  Van Rhijn, Arjen ^a   Mulder, Jurriaan D ^b  

^a CWI   (Netherlands)

^b Personal Space Technologies (PS Tech)   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Configurable input device; Direct manipulation; Multi dimensional control; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CONTROL; MOTION COMPENSATION; USER INTERFACES;

CONFIGURABLE INPUT DEVICES; DIRECT MANIPULATION; MULTI DIMENSIONAL CONTROL; OBJECT MANIPULATION;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 34547402574     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1180495.1180507     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. R. Balakrishnan and K. Hinckley. The role of kinesthetic reference frames in two-handed input performance. In Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pages 171-178, 1999.
2. D. E. Broadbent and M. Gregory. Donders' b- and c-reactions and S-R compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology 63, pages 575-578, 1962.
3. P. M. Fitts and C. M. Seeger. S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46:199-210, 1953.
4. B. Fröhlich and J. Plate. The cubic mouse: A new device for 3d input. In Proc. ACM CHI 2000, pages 526-531. ACM Press, New York, 2000.
5. W. Garner. The Processing of Information and Structure. Wiley, New York, 1974.
6. Y. Guiard. Assymetric division of labor in skilled bimanual action: The kinematic chain as a model. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19:486-517, 1987.
7. R. J. K. Jacob and L. E. Sibert. The perceptual structure of multidimensional input device selection. In CHI '92: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 211-218, New York, NY, USA, 1992. ACM Press.
8. R. J. K. Jacob, L. E. Sibert, D. C. McFarlane, M. Preston, and J. R. Mullen. Integrality and separability of input devices. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 1(1):3-26, 1994.
9. R. J. Jagacinski, D. W. Repperger, M. S. Moran, S. L. Ward, and B. Class. Fitts' law and the microstructure of rapid discrete movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6(2):309-320, 1980.
10. P. Kabbash, W. Buxton, and A. Sellen. Two-handed input in a compound task. In CHI '94: Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, 1994.
11. D. Meister. Human Factors: Theory and Practice. Wiley-Interscience, 1971.
12. M. R. Mine, F. P. B. Jr., and C. H. Séquin. Moving objects in space: Exploiting proprioception in virtual-environment interaction. In SIGGRAPH 97 Conference Proceedings, pages 19-26, 1997.
13. J. D. Mulder, J. Jansen, and A. van Rhijn. An affordable optical head tracking system for desktop VR/AR systems. In J. Deisinger and A. Kunz, editors, Proceedings of the Workshop on Virtual Environments 2003, pages 215-223, 2003.
14. J. D. Mulder and R. van Liere. The personal space station: Bringing interaction within reach. In S. Richer, P. Richard, and B. Taravel, editors, Proceedings of the Virtual Reality International Conference, VRIC 2002, pages 73-81, 2002.
15. Personal Space Technologies. http://www.personalspacetechnologies.com/.
16. A. van Rhijn and J. D. Mulder. CID: An optically tracked configurable interaction device. In Proceedings of Laval Virtual International Conference on Virtual Reality 2006, 2006.
17. A. van Rhijn and J. D. Mulder. Optical tracking and automatic model estimation of composite interaction devices. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference 2006, Alexandria, Virginia, USA, 2006.
18. A. Simon and B. Fröhlich. The yoyo: A handheld device combining elastic and isotonic input. In Proc. of INTERACT 2003, pages 303-310, 2003.
19. M. Tlauka. Display-control compatibility: The relationship between performance and judgments of performance. Ergonomics, 47(3):281-295, 2004.
20. K.-P. L. Vu and R. W. Proctor. Naïve and experienced judgments of stimulus-response compatibility: Implications for interface design. Ergonomics, 46(1):169-187, 2003.
21. Y. Wang and C. L. MacKenzie. Object manipulation in virtual environments: relative size matters. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, pages 48-55, 1999.
22. Y. Wang, C. L. MacKenzie, V. A. Summers, and K. S. Booth. The structure of object transportation and orientation in human-computer interaction. In CHI '98: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 312-319, New York, NY, USA, 1998. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
23. C. Ware and R. Arsenault. Frames of reference in virtual object rotation. In Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, 2004.
24. C. J. Worringham and D. B. Beringer. Operator orientation and compatibility in visual-motor task performance. Ergonomics, 32(1):387-399, 1989.
25. C. J. Worringham and D. B. Beringer. Directional stimulus-response compatibility: A test of three alternative principles. Ergonomics, 41(6):864-880, 1998.