The Methodology of Students-as-Researchers: Valuing and using experience and expertise to develop methods

Discourse

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 327-342

  Thomson, Pat ^a   Gunter, Helen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547374514     PISSN: 01596306     EISSN: 14693739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01596300701458863     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Alcoff, L. & Potter, E. (1993). Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge.
2. Alenen, L. (2005). Women's studies/childhood studies. Parallels, links and perspectives. In J. Mason & T. Fattore (Eds.), Children taken seriously: In theory, policy and practice (pp. 31-45). London: Jessica Kingsley.
3. Alvesson, M. & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing critical management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Anderson, G., Herr, K., & Nihlen, A. S. (1994). Studying your own school. An educator's guide to qualitative practitioner research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
5. Anderson, G. & Jones, F. (2000). Knowledge generation in education administration from the inside-out: The promise and perils of site-based, administrator research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 428-464.
6. Arnot, M. & Reay, D. (2007). A sociology of pedagogic voice: Power, inequality and pupil consultation. Discourse, 28(3), 311-325. (this issue)
7. Ashcraft, K. & Mumby, D. (2004). Reworking gender. A feminist communicology of organisation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Atweh, B. & Burton, L. (1995). Students as researchers: Rationale and critique. British Educational Research Journal, 21, 561-575.
9. Blackmore, J. (1991). Making educational history: A feminist perspective. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
10. Burbules, N. & Philips, D. (2000). Postpostivism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
11. Carspecken, P. & Apple, M. (1992). Critical qualitative research: Theory, methodology, and practice. In M. Le Compte, W. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 507-553). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Harcourt Brace and Co.
12. Chaplin, E. (1994). Sociology and visual representation. London and New York: Routledge.
13. Cheek, J. (2000). Postmodern and poststructural approaches to nursing research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Clark-Ibanez, M. (2004). Framing the social world and photo-elicitation interviews. American Behavioural Scientist, 477, 1507-1527.
15. Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. (1993). Inside - outside: Teacher research and knowledge. Columbia, NY: Teachers College Press.
16. Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28, 15-25.
17. Grotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
18. Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.) (1998). The landscape of qualitative research. Theories and issues. London: Sage.
19. Edwards, J. (2000). Students-as-researchers. Adelaide: South Australian Department for Children's Services.
20. Egan-Robertson, A. & Bloome, D. (Eds.) (1998). Students as researchers of culture and language in their own communities. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
21. Emmison, M. & Smith, P. (2001). Researching the visual. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Everton, T., Galton, M., & Pell, A. (2000). Teachers' perspectives in educational research: Knowledge and context. Journal of Education for Teaching, 26, 167-182.
23. Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30, 295-311.
24. Fielding, M. & Bragg, S. (2003). Students as researchers; Making a difference. Cambridge: Pearson.
25. Fine, M. (1992). Disruptive voices. The possibilities of feminist research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
26. Fine, M., Roberts, R. A., Torre, M. E., Bloom, J., Burns, A., Chajet, L., et al. (2004). Echoes of Brown: Youth documenting and performing the legacy of Brown v Board of Education, New York: Teachers College Press.
27. Flutter, J. & Rudduck, J. (2004). Consulting pupils. What's in it for schools? London: Routledge-Falmer.
28. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter. Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Fraser, S., Lewis, V., Ding, S., Kellett, M., & Robinson, C. (2004). Doing research with children and young people. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education. Interaction and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Fuss, D. (1990). Essentially speaking: Feminism, nature and difference. London: Routledge.
32. Ginwright, S., Noguera, P., & Cammarota, J. (Eds.) (2006). Beyond resistance! Youth activism and community change. New York: Routledge.
33. Griffiths, M. (1998). Educational research for social justice. Getting off the fence. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
34. Grosz, E. (1995). Space, time and perversion. London: Routledge.
35. Gunter, H. & Thomson, P. (2007). But, where are the children? Management in Education, 21(1), 23-28.
36. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575-599.
37. Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is "strong objectivity"? In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49-82). New York: Routledge.
38. Hollins, K., Gunter, H., & Thomson, P. (2006). Living improvement: A case study of a school in England. Improving Schools, 9(2), 141-152.
39. Hurworth, R. (2003). Photo-interviewing for research. Social Research Update, 40. Retrieved July 18, 2004, from http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/ SRU40.html.
40. Johnson, P. & Duberley, J. (2000). Understanding management research. An introduction to epistemology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Kaplan, I. & Howes, A. (2004). "Seeing with difference eyes": Exploring the value of participative research using images in schools. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34, 143-155.
42. Kenway, J. & Bullen, E. (2001). Consuming children: Entertainment, advertising and education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
43. Lather, P. (1991). Feminist research: With/against. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
44. Lather, P. (1992). Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and poststructural perspectives. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 87-99.
45. Macbeath, J. (2000). Schools should speak for themselves. London: Falmer.
46. Macbeath, J., Demetriou, H., Rudduck, J., & Myers, K. (2003). Consulting pupils: A toolkit. Cambridge, UK: Pearson.
47. Macbeath, J., Jakobsen, L., Meuret, D., & Schratz, M. (2000). Self evaluation in European schools: A story of change. London: Routledge.
48. McGregor, J. (n.d.). Students as researchers. Cranfield, England: Networked Learning Communities, National College for School Leadership.
49. McWilliam, E., Lather, P., & Morgan, W. (1997). Head work, field work, text work: A textshop in new feminist research. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology.
50. Mitra, D. (2003). Student voice in school reform: Reframing student-teacher relationships. McGill Journal of Education, 38(2), 289-304.
51. Prain, V. (1997). Textualising yourself in research writing: Some current challenges. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29, 71-85.
52. Prosser, J. (Ed.) (1998). Image-based research. A sourcebook for qualitative researchers. London: Palmer Press.
53. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
54. Rosaldo, R. (1993). Culture and truth. The remaking of social analysis (Rev. ed). Boston: Beacon Press.
55. Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies. London: Sage.
56. Rubin, B. & Silva, E. (Eds.) (2003). Critical voices in school reform. New York: Routledge.
57. Rudduck, J., Chaplain, R., & Wallace, G. (1996). School improvement; What can pupils tell us? London: David Fulton.
58. Rudduck, J. & Flutter, J. (2004). How to improve your school. London: Continuum.
59. Scheurich, J. J. (1997). Research method in the postmodern. London: Falmer.
60. Schwartz, D. (1989). Visual ethnography: Using photography in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 12, 119-154.
61. Sherrod, I., Flanagan, C., & Kassimir, R. (2006). Youth activism. An international encyclopaedia. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
62. Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic. A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
63. Steinberg, S. R. & Kincheloe, J. (Eds.) (1998). Students as researchers: Creating classrooms that matter. Bristol, UK: Falmer.
64. Thomson, P. (Ed.) (in press). Doing visual research with children and young people. London: Routledge.
65. Thomson, P. & Gunter, H. (2006). From "consulting pupils" to "pupils as researchers": A situated case narrative. British Journal of Educational Research, 32, 839-856.
66. Thomson, P. & Gunter, H. (in press). Researching bullying with students: A lens on everyday life in a reforming high school. International Journal of Inclusive Education.
67. United Nations. (1990). United Nations convention on the rights of the child. UN document A/44/25. Geneva: Author.
68. Walker, R. (1993). Finding a silent voice for the researcher: Using photographs in evaluation and research. In M. Schratz (Ed.), Qualitative voices in educational research (pp. 72-92). London: Falmer.
69. Wasley, P., Hampel, R., & Clark, R. (1997). Kids and school reform. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
70. Young, M. (Ed.) (1971). Knowledge and control. London: Collier-MacMillan.
71. Zeni, J. (Ed.) (2001). Ethical issues in practitioner research. New York: Teachers College Press.