The impact of training on interpersonal influence;El efecto de la formación sobre la influencia interpersonal

Psicothema

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 401-405

  Briñol, Pablo ^a   Horcajo, Javier ^a   Díaz, Darío ^a   Valle, Carmen ^b   Becerra, Alberto ^a   De Miguel, Jesús ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD SAN PABLO CEU   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; BEHAVIOR; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; LEARNING; MOTIVATION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; REVIEW;

AFFECT; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LEARNING; MOTIVATION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 34547338920     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Berzonsky, M.D., y Sullivan, C. (1992). Social-cognitive aspects of identity style: Need for cognition, experiential openness and introspection. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 140-155.
2. Briñol, P., Becerra, A., Díaz, D., Valle, C., Horcajo, J., y Gallardo, I. (2005). El efecto de la necesidad de cognición sobre la influencia interpersonal. Psicothema, 17, 645-650.
3. Briñol, P., Horcajo, J., Becerra, A., Falces, C., y Sierra, B. (2003). Equilibrio cognitivo implícito. Psicothema, 15, 375-380.
4. Briñol, P., Horcajo, J., Becerra, A., Falces, C., y Sierra, B., (2002). Cambio de actitudes implícitas. Psicothema, 14, 771-775.
5. Briñol, P., y Petty, R.E. (2005). Individual differences in persuasion. En D. Albarracín, B.T. Johnson y M.P. Zanna (eds.): The handbook of attitudes and attitude change (pp. 575-616). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Briñol, P., Rucker, D., Tormala, Z.L., y Petty, R.E. (2004). Individual differences in resistance to persuasion: The role of beliefs and meta-beliefs. En E.S. Knowles y J.A. Linn (eds.): Resistance and persuasion (pp. 83-104). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Brodbeck, F. C. (1996). Criteria for the study of the work group functioning. En M.A. West (ed.): Handbook of work group psychology, Chiester: John Wiley y Sons.
8. Cacioppo, J.T., y Petty, R.E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
9. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., y Kao, C.F. (1984). The efficient assessment of «need for cognition». Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
10. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Feinstein, J.A., y Jarvis. W.B. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: the life and times of individuals varying in Need for Cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
11. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Kao, C., y Rodríguez, R. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1032-1043.
12. Cohen, J., y Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Cohen, S.G., Ledford, G.E., y Spreitzer, G.M. (1996). A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness. Human Relations, 49, 643-676.
14. Dunning, D., Heath, C., y Suls, J.M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69-106.
15. Falces, C., Briñol, P., Sierra, B., Becerra, A., y Alier, E. (2001). Validación de la escala de Necesidad de Cognición y aplicación al estudio del cambio de actitudes. Psicothema, 13, 647-653.
16. McGrath, J.E., Berdahl, J.L., y Arrow, H. (1995). Traits, expectations, culture and clout: The dynamics of diversity in work groups. En S.E. Jackson y M.N. Ruderman (eds.): Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace (pp. 17-45). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17. Miller, ML., Omens, R.S., y Delvadia, R. (1991). Dimensions of social competence: Personality and copyng style correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 955-964.
18. Osberg, T. (1987). The convergent and discriminant validity of the need for cognition scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 441-450.
19. Petty, R.E. (2001). Subtle influences on judgments and behaviors: Who is most susceptible? En J. Forgas y K.D. Williams (eds.): Social influence: Direct and indirect processes (pp. 129-146). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
20. Petty, R.E., y Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
21. Shestowsky, D., Wegener, D.T., y Fabrigar, L.R. (1998). Need for Cognition and Interpersonal Influence: Individual differences in impact on Dyadic decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1317-1328.
22. Venkatraman, M.P., Marlino, D., Kardes, F.R., y Sklar, K.B. (1990). Effects of individual difference variables on response to factual and evaluative ads. Advances in Consumer Research, 17, 761-765.