Effects of Deliberative Democracy on School Self-Evaluation

Evaluation

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 371-386

  Davidsdottir, Sigurlina ^a   Lisi, Penelope ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

^b CENTRAL CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

deliberative democracy; educational self evaluation; empowerment; program fidelity; teacher ownership

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547309558     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1356389007078628     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bandura, A. (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
2. Brunner, I. and A. Guzman (1989) ‘Participatory Evaluation: A Tool to Assess Projects and Empower People’, in R. F. Conner and M. Hendricks (eds) International Innovations in Evaluation Methodology. New Directions for Evaluation 42, pp. 9—18. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Fetterman, D.M. (1994) ‘Empowerment Evaluation’, Evaluation Practice 15: 1—15.
4. Fetterman, D.M. (2001) Foundations of Empowerment Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5. Fitzpatrick, J., J.R. Sanders and B.R. Worthen (2004) Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 3rd edn. Boston: Pearson and Allyn & Bacon.
6. Fullan, M. (2001) The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Hansen, M. and R. Lander (2005) ‘Teacher Trust in Collective Efficiency Concerning the Management of Objectives and Time’, paper presented at the NERA congress in Oslo, 10—13 March.
8. Henry, G.T. (2000) ‘Benefits and Limitations of Deliberations’, in K. E. Ryan and L. DeStefano (eds) Evaluation as a Democratic Process: Promoting Inclusion, Dialogue, and Deliberation. New Directions for Evaluation 85, pp. 91—6. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. House, E.R. and K.R. Howe (2000) ‘Deliberative Democratic Evaluation’, in K. E. Ryan and L. DeStefano (eds) Evaluation as a Democratic Process: Promoting Inclusion, Dialogue, and Deliberation. New Directions for Evaluation 85, pp. 3—12. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. James, M., D. Pedder, S. Swaffield, C. Conner, D. Frost and J. MacBeath (2003) ‘A Servant of Two Masters: Designing Research to Advance Knowledge and Practice’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association in Chicago, 21—5 April.
11. Joyce, B. and B. Showers (1987) ‘Low-Cost Arrangements for Peer Coaching’, Journal of Staff Development 8(1): 22—4.
12. Leithwood, K., R. Aitken and D. Jantzi (2001) Making Schools Smarter: A System for Monitoring School and District Progress, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
13. McGee, D. and C. Starnes (1988) Evaluation as Empowerment: Holistic Evaluation across the Curriculum. Quebec, Canada: Research and Development, John Abbott College (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 319—425).
14. McNamara, G. and J. O'Hara (2004) ‘Trusting the Teacher: Evaluating Educational Innovation’, Evaluation 10(4): 463—74.
15. Mowbray, C.T., M.D. Holter, G.B. Teague and D. Bybee (2003) ‘Fidelity Criteria: Development, Measurement, and Validation’, American Journal of Evaluation 24(3): 315—40.
16. Ryan, K.E. and L. DeStefano (2000) ‘Disentangling Dialogue: Issues from Practice’, in K. E. Ryan and L. DeStefano (eds) Evaluation as a Democratic Process: Promoting Inclusion, Dialogue, and Deliberation. New Directions for Evaluation 85, pp. 73—6. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Showers, B. (1985) ‘Teachers Coaching Teachers’, Educational Leadership 42(7): 43—8.
18. Themessl-Huber, M.T. and M.A. Grutsch (2003) ‘The Shifting Locus of Control in Participatory Evaluations’, Evaluation 9(1): 92—111.