Retention of three endodontic post systems

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 198-200

  Peters, John ^b   Zyman, Gad ^c   Kogan, Enrique ^c   Kuttler, Sergio ^a,b   García Godoy, Franklin ^a  

^a NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Prosthodontics ^*  (United States)

^c Department of Endodontics   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; METHODOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIOGRAPHY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BICUSPID; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 34547303971     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: Effects of cement, dowel length, diameter and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:401-405.
2. Ferrari M, Vichi A, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000;13(Sp Is):15B-18B.
3. Nathanson D, Ashayeri N. New aspects of restoring the endodontically treated tooth. Alpha Omegan 1990;83:76-80.
4. Schwartz RS, Fransman R. Adhesive dentistry and endodontics: Materials, clinical strategies and procedures for restoration of access cavities: A review. J Endod 2005;31:151-165.
5. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982;16:265-273.
6. Kogan FE, Zyman FG. Comparative study of the adaptation of three endodontic posts to their preparations. Rev ADM 2004;61:102-108. (In Spanish).
7. Peters MCRB, Poort HW, Farah JW, Craig RG. Stress analysis of a tooth restored with a post and core. J Dent Res 1983;62:760-763.
8. Gutmann JL. The dentin-root complex: Anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:458-467.
9. Lloyd MP, Palik FJ. The philosophies of dowel diameter preparation: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:1-32.
10. Pitel M, Hicks N. Evolving technology in endodontic posts. Campend Contin Educ Dent 2003;24:13-29.
11. Wildey WL, Senia S, Montgomery S. Another look at root canal instrumentation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;74:499-507.
12. Peters O. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: A review. J Endod 2004;30:559-567.
13. Fernandes A., Shetty S, Coutinho I. Factors determining post selection: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:556-562.
14. Miller A. Post and core systems: Which one is best? J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:27-38.
15. Martinez-Insua A, da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth with a cast post and core or carbon fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:527-532.
16. Christensen GJ. Post and cores: State of the art. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:96.
17. Ari H, Yasar E Belli S. Effects of NaOCl on bond strengths of resin cements to root canal dentin. J Endod 2003;29:248-251.
18. Brännström M, Nordenvall KJ. The effect of acid etching on enamel, dentin, and the inner surface of the resin restoration: A scanning electron microscopic investigation. J Dent Res 1976;56:917-923.
19. Lertchirakarn V, Palamara JEA, Messer HH. Patterns of vertical root fracture: Factors affecting stress distribution in the root canal. J Endod 2005;29:523-528.
20. Kuttler S, McLean A, Dorn S, Fischgang A. The impact of post space preparation with Gates Glidden drills on residual dentin thickness in distal roots of mandibular molars. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:903-909.
21. Gesi A, Magnolfi S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Comparison of two techniques for removing fiber posts. J Endod 2003;29:580-582.