Empirical comparison of equity preference questionnaire and equity sensitivity instrument in relation to work outcome preferences

Psychological Reports

Volumn 100, Issue 3 I, 2007, Pages 955-962

  Wheeler, Kenneth G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34547281404     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/PR0.100.3.955-962     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ALLEN, R. S. (2002) Equity sensitivity theory: a test of responses to two types of under-reward situations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14(4), 435-451.
2. COLQUITT, J. A. (2004) Does the justice of the one interact with the justice of the many? Reactions to procedural justice in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 633-647.
3. HUSEMAN, R., HATFIELD, J., & MILES, E. (1985) Test for individual perceptions of job equity: some preliminary findings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1055-1064.
4. HUSEMAN, R., HATFIELD, J., & MILES, E. (1987) A new perspective on equity theory: the equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12, 222-234.
5. KICKUL, J., & LESTER, S. W. (2001) Broken promises: equity sensitivity as a moderator between psychological contract breach and employee attitudes and behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 191-217.
6. KING, W., JR., & MILES, E. (1994) The measurement of equity sensitivity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 133-142.
7. KING, W., JR., MILES, E., & DAY, D. (1993) A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 301-317.
8. MILES, E., HATFIELD, J., & HUSEMAN, R. (1989) The equity sensitivity construct: potential implications for worker performance. Journal of Management, 4, 581-588.
9. MILES, E., HATFIELD, J., & HUSEMAN, R. (1994) Equity sensitivity and outcome importance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 585-596.
10. MINTU-WIMSATT, A. (2003) King and Miles' Equity Sensitivity Instrument: a cross-cultural validation. Psychological Reports, 92, 23-26.
11. RAJA, U., JOHNS, G., & NTALIANIS, F. (2004) The impact of personality on psychological contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 350-367.
12. ROEHLING, M. V., & BOSWELL, W. (2004) "Good cause beliefs" in an "at-will world"? A focused investigation of psychological versus legal contracts. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4, 211-231.
13. SAULEY, K. S., & BEDEIAN, A. G. (2000) Equity sensitivity: construction of a measure and examination of its psychometric properties. Journal of Management, 26, 885-910.
14. SHORE, T. H. (2004) Equity sensitivity theory: do we all want more than we deserve? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19, 722-728.
15. WHEELER, K. G. (2002) Cultural values in relation to equity sensitivity within and across cultures. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17, 612-627.
16. YAMAGUCHI, I. (2003) The relationships among individual differences, needs and equity sensitivity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18, 324-344.