The relationships among individual differences, needs and equity sensitivity

Journal of Managerial Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 324-344

  Yamaguchi, Ikushi ^a  

^a MEIJI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Development; Equity; Individual behaviour; Japan

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141525374     PISSN: 02683946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02683940310473082     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adams, J.S. (1963a), "Toward an understanding of inequity", Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 67 No. 5, pp. 422-36.
2. Adams, J.S. (1963b), "Wage inequities, productivity and work quality", Industrial Relations, Vol. 3, pp. 9-39.
3. Adams, J.S. (1965), "Inequity in social exchange", in Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 267-99.
4. Adler, N.J. (1991), International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior, 2nd ed., PWS-KENT, Boston, MA.
5. Alderfer, P.C. (1969), "An empirical test of new theory of human needs", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 4, pp. 132-75.
6. Ambrose, M.L. and Schminke, M. (2001), "Are flexible organizations the death knell for the future of procedural justice?", in Cropanzano, R. (Ed.), Justice in the Workplace: from Theory to Practice, Vol. 2, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 229-44.
7. Arbuckle, J.L. and Wothke, W. (1995), Amos 4.0 User's Guide, Small Waters Corporation, Chicago. IL.
8. Blumstein, P.W. and Weinstein, E.A. (1969), "The redress of distributive injustice", American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 74 No. 4, pp. 408-18.
9. Brockner, J. and Siegel, P. (1996), "Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice", in Kramer, R.M. and Tyler, T.R. (Eds), Understanding the Interaction between Procedural and Distributive Justice, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 390-413.
10. Carrell, M.R. and Dittrich, J.E. (1978), "Equity theory: the recent literature, methodological considerations, and new directions", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 3, pp. 202-10.
11. Cropanzano, R. and Ambrose, ML. (2001), "Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: a monistic perspective and a research agenda", in Greenberg, J. and Cropanzano, R. (Eds), Advances in Organizational Justice, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 119-51.
12. Davis-Blake, A. and Pfeffer, J. (1989), "Just mirage: the search for dispositional effects in organizational research", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 385-400.
13. Deutch, M. (1987), "Experimental studies of the effects of different systems of distributive justice", in Masters, J.C. and Smith, W.P. (Eds), Social Comparison, Social Justice, and Relative Deprivation, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 151-64.
14. Fiske, A.P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H.R. and Nisbett, R.E. (1998), "The cultural matrix of social psychology", in Gilbert, D.T., Fiske, S.T. and Lindzey, G. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 915-81.
15. Folger, R. (1984), "Perceived injustice, referent cognitions, and the concept of comparison level", Representative Research in Social Psychology, Vol. 14, pp. 88-108.
16. Folger, R. and Konovsky, M.A. (1989), "Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 115-30.
17. Friedman, A. and Goodman, P.S. (1967), "Wage inequity, self-qualifications, and productivity", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 2, pp. 406-17.
18. Goodman, P.S. and Friedman, A. (1968), "An examination of the effect of wage inequity in the hourly condition", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 3, pp. 340-52.
19. Greenberg, J. (1978), "Allocator-recipient similarity and the equitable division of rewards", Social Psychology, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 337-41.
20. Greenberg, J. (1989), "Cognitive reevaluation of outcomes in response to underpayment inequity", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 174-84.
21. Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
22. Hofstede, G. (1991), Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, McGraw-Hill Book Company Europe, Basingstoke.
23. House, R.J., Shane, S.A. and Herold, D.M. (1996), "Humors of the death of dispositional research are vastly exaggerated", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 203-24.
24. Huseman, R.C., Hatfield, J.D. and Miles, E.W. (1985), "Test for individual perceptions of job equity: some preliminary findings", Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 61, pp. 1055-64.
25. Huseman, R.C., Hatfield, J.D. and Miles, E.W. (1987), "A new perspective on equity theory: the equity sensitivity construct", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 222-34.
26. King, W.C., Miles, E.W. and Day, D.D. (1993), "A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct", Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 14, pp. 301-17.
27. Lawler, E.E. III and O'Gara, P.W. (1967), "Effects of inequity produced by underpayment on work output, work quality, and attitudes toward the work",Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 51 No. 5, pp. 403-10.
28. Leung, K. and Bond, M.H. (1982), "How Chinese and Americans reward task-related contributions: a preliminary study", Psychologia, Vol. 25, pp. 32-9.
29. Leung, K. and Bond, M.H. (1984), "The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 47 No. 4, pp. 793-804.
30. Leung, K. and Iwawaki, S. (1988), "Cultural collectivism and distributive behavior", Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 133-51.
31. Leung, K. and Park, H.-J. (1986), "Effects of interactional goal on choice of allocation rule: a cross-national study", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 37, pp. 111-20.
32. McClelland, D.C. (1961), The Achieving Society, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.
33. Markus, H.R. and Kitayama, S. (1991), "Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion and motivation", Psychological Review, Vol. 98, pp. 224-53.
34. Maslow, A. (1943), "A theory of human motivation", Psychological Review, Vol. 50, pp. 370-96.
35. Maslow, A. (1954), Motivation and Personality, Harper & Row Publisher, New York, NY.
36. Miles, E.W., Hatfield, J.D. and Huseman, R.C. (1994), "Equity sensitivity and outcome importance", Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 15, pp. 585-96.
37. Miles, J.A. and Greenberg, J. (1993), "Cross-national differences in preferences for distributive justice norms: the challenge of establishing fair resource allocations in the European community", in Ferris, G.R. (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Supplement 3, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 133-56.
38. Morris, M.W., Lueng, K., Ames, D. and Lickel, B. (1999), "Views from inside and outside: integrating emic and etic insights about culture and justice judgment", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 781-96.
39. Mowday, R.T. (1983), "Equity theory predictions of behavior in organizations", in Steers, R. and Porter, L. (Eds), Motivation and Work Behavior, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY, pp. 91-113.
40. Porter, L. and Lawler, E.E. in (1968), Managerial Attitudes and Performance, Dorsey, New York, NY.
41. Prithcard, R.D., Dunnette, M.D. and Jorgenson, D.O. (1972), "Effects of perceptions of equity and inequity on worker performance and satisfaction", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 56 No. 1, pp. 75-94.
42. Robbins, S.P. (1996), Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies, Applications, A Simon & Schuster, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
43. Schwartz, S.H. (1994), "Beyond individualism and collectivism: new cultural dimensions of values", in Kim, U., Triandis, H.C., Kagitcibashi, C., Choi, S.-C. and Yoon, G. (Eds), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 85-122.
44. Steers, R. and Braunstein, D. (1976), "A behaviorally based measure of manifest needs in work settings", Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 9, pp. 251-66.
45. Triandis, H.C. (1994), "Cross-cultural industrial and organizational pschology", in Triandis, H.C., Dunnette;M. and Hough, L. (Eds), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2nd ed., Vol. 4, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 103-72.
46. Triandis, H.C. (1995), Individualism and Collectivism, Westview, Boulder, CO.
47. Van den Bos, K., Lind, E.A. and Wilke, H.A.M. (2001), "The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory", in Cropanzano, R. (Ed.), Justice in the Workplace: from Theory to Practice, Vol. 2, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 49-66.
48. Vroom, V.H. (1964), Work and Motivation, Wiley, New York, NY.
49. Walster, E., Walster, G.W. and Berscheid, E. (1978), Equity: Theory and Research, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
50. Weick, K.E. and Nesset, B. (1968), "Preferences among forms of equity", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 3, pp. 400-16.
51. Weick, K.E., Bougon, M.G. and Maruyama, G. (1976), "The equity context", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 15, pp. 32-65.
52. Wicker, A.W. (1969), "Attitude versus action: the relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects", Journal of Social Issues, Autumn, pp. 41-78.