Distinctive regions of 3D surfaces

ACM Transactions on Graphics

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2007, Pages

  Shilane, Philip ^a,b   Funkhouser, Thomas ^a,b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Argentinean Association on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics   (United States)

Author keywords

Distinct features; Partial matching; Shape distinction; Similarity; Visualization

Indexed keywords

DISTINCT FEATURES; GEOMETRIC MODELING; PARTIAL MATCHING; SHAPE DISTINCTION;

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; SURFACE ANALYSIS;

PATTERN MATCHING;

EID: 34547242285     PISSN: 07300301     EISSN: 15577368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1243980.1243981     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. BELONGIE, S., MALIK, J., AND PUZICHA, J. 2002. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE Trans. Patt. Analy. Mach. Intell. 24, 24, 509-522.
2. BERG, A., BERG, T., AND MALIK, J. 2005. Shape matching and object recognition using low distortion correspondence. In IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
3. BLANZ, V., TARR, M., BUELTHOFF, H., AND VETTER, T. 1999. What object attributes determine canonical views? Perception. 575-599.
4. BUSTOS, B., KEIM, D., SAUPE, D., SCHRECK, T., AND VRANIĆ, D. 2005. Feature-based similarity search in 3D object databases. ACM Comput. Surv. 37, 4, 345-387.
5. CHUA, C. AND JARVIS, R. 1996. Point signatures: A new representation for 3D object recognition. Int. J. Comput. Vision 25, 1, 63-85.
6. COPAS, J. 1983. Regression, prediction, and shrinkage. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Series B (Methodological) 45, 3, 311-354.
7. DUDA, R., HART, P., AND STORK, D. 2001. Pattern Classification, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
8. FRANK, I. E. AND FRIEDMAN, J. H. 1993. A statistical view of some chemometrics regression tools. Technometrics 35, 2 (May), 109-135.
9. FRINTROP, S., NCHTER, A., SURMANN, H., AND HERTZBERG, J. 2004. Saliency-based object recognition in 3D data. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Sendai, Japan.
10. FROME, A., HUBER, D., KOLLURI, R., BULOW, T., AND MALIK, J. 2004. Recognizing objects in range data using regional point descriptors. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). 224-237.
11. FUNKHOUSER, T., MIN, P., KAZHDAN, M., CHEN, J., HALDERMAN, A., DOBKIN, D., AND JACOBS, D. 2003. A search engine for 3D models. Trans. Graph. 22, 1, 83-105.
12. FUNKHOUSER, T. AND SHILANE, P. 2006. Partial matching of 3D shapes with priority-driven search. In Symposium of Geometry Processing.
13. GAL, R. AND COHEN-OR, D. 2006. Salient geometric features for partial shape matching and similarity. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 1 (Jan.), 130-150.
14. GARLAND, M. AND HECKBERT, P. S. 1997. Surface simplification using quadric error metrics. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1997. 209-216.
15. GELFAND, N., MITRA, N., GUIBAS, L., AND POTTMAN, H. 2005. Robust global registration. In Symposium on Geometry Processing. Vienna, Austria.
16. HASTIE, T., TIBSHIRANI, R., AND FRIEDMAN, J. 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
17. HOFFMAN, D. D. AND SINGH, M. 1997. Salience of visual parts. Cognition 63.
18. HOWLETT, S., HAMILL, J., AND O'SULLIVAN, C. 2004. An experimental approach to predicting saliency for simplified polygonal models. Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization.
19. IYER, N., JAYANTI, S., LOU, K., KALYANARAMAN, Y., AND RAMANI, K. 2005. Three dimensional shape searching: State-of-the-art review and future trends. Comput.-Aid. Design 37, 5, 509-530.
20. JARVELIN, K. AND KEKALAINEN, J. 2000. IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents. In 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.
21. JOHNSON, A. 2000. Surface landmark selection and matching in natural terrain. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Vol. 2. 413-420.
22. JOHNSON, A. AND HEBERT, M. 1999. Using spin-images for efficient multiple model recognition in cluttered 3-D scenes. IEEE PAMI 21, 5, 433-449.
23. KAZHDAN, M. 2004. Shape representations and algorithms for 3D model retrieval. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, Princeton University.
24. KAZHDAN, M., FUNKHOUSER, T., AND RUSINKIEWICZ, S. 2003. Rotation invariant spherical harmonic representation of 3D shape descriptors. In Symposium on Geometry Processing. 167-175.
25. KORTGEN, M., PARK, G.-J., NOVOTNI, M., AND KLEIN, R. 2003. 3D shape matching with 3D shape contexts. In 7th Central European Seminar on Computer Graphics.
26. LACHENBRUCH, P. AND GOLDSTEIN, M. 1979. Discriminant analysis. Biometrics 35, 1 (March), 69-85.
27. LEE, C. H., VARSHNEY, A., AND JACOBS, D. W. 2005. Mesh saliency. In ACM SIGGRAPH. ACM Press, New York, NY, 659-666.
28. LEIFMAN, G., KATZ, S., TAL, A., AND MEIR, R. 2003. Signatures of 3D models for retrieval. In the 4th Israel-Korea Bi-National Conference on Geometric Modeling and Computer Graphics. 159-163.
29. LI, X. AND GUSKOV, I. 2005. Multi-scale features for approximate alignment of point-based surfaces. In Symposium on Geometry Processing. Vienna, Austria.
30. LOWE, D. 1999. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision. Vol. 2. 1150-1157.
31. LOWE, D. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vision 60, 2 (Nov.), 91-110.
32. MCLACHLAN, G. J. 1992. Discriminant Analysis and Statistical Pattern Recognition. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY.
33. MILLER, R. G. 1997. Beyond ANOVA: Basics of Applied Statistics. Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York, NY.
34. MORI, G., BELONGIE, S., AND MALIK, J. 2001. Shape contexts enable efficient retrieval of similar shapes. In IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
35. NOVOTNI, M., DEGENER, P., AND KLEIN, R. 2005. Correspondence generation and matching of 3D shape subparts. Tech. rep. CG-2005-2, Universität Bonn.
36. OSADA, R., FUNKHOUSER, T., CHAZELLE, B., AND DOBKIN, D. 2002. Shape distributions. ACM Trans. Graph. 21, 4, 807-832.
37. PITMAN, J. 1993. Probability. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
38. SHAN, Y., MATEI, B., SAWHNEY, H. S., KUMAR, R., HUBER, D., AND HEBERT, M. 2004. Linear model hashing and batch ransac for rapid and accurate object recognition. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
39. SHILANE, P. AND FUNKHOUSER, T. 2006. Selecting distinctive 3D shape descriptors for similarity retrieval. In Shape Modeling International. 108-117.
40. SHILANE, P., MIN, P., KAZHDAN, M., AND FUNKHOUSER, T. 2004. The Princeton Shape Benchmark. In Shape Modeling International. 167-178.
41. SPHARMONICKIT 2.5. 1998. Fast spherical transforms: Spharmonickit. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~geelong/sphere/.
42. TANGELDER, J. AND VELTKAMP, R. 2004. A survey of content based 3D shape retrieval methods. In Shape Modeling International. 145-156.
43. VÁZQUEZ, P.-P., FEIXAS, M., SBERT, M., AND HEIDRICH, W. 2001. Viewpoint selection using viewpoint entropy. In Proceedings of the Vision Modeling and Visualization Conference (VMV'01). Aka GmbH, 273-280.
44. VRANIC, D. V. 2003. An improvement of rotation invariant 3D shape descriptor based on functions on concentric spheres. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP'03). Vol. 3. 757-760.