Men's recognition of violence against women and spousal abuse: Comparison of three groups of men

Violence and Victims

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 419-436

  Chamberland, Claire ^a   Fortin, Andrée ^a   Turgeon, Joane ^b   Laporte, Lise ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b Comité Priorité Violence Conjugale ^*  (Canada)

^c University of Montreal   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cognition; EVA; Program; Spousal abuse

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGGRESSION; ARTICLE; ASSAULT; AWARENESS; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; DOMINANCE BEHAVIOR; EVALUATION OF VIOLENCE THROUGH AUDIOVISUAL; GENDER; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARTNER VIOLENCE; RECOGNITION; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; VERBAL HOSTILITY; VIOLENCE;

EID: 34547240698     PISSN: 08866708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1891/088667007781553937     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abric, J. C. (1976). Pratiques sociales, représentations sociales. In J. C. Abric (Ed.), Pratiques sociales et representations (pp. 217-238). Paris: PUF.
2. Archer, J. (1999). Assessment of the reliability of the Conflict Tactics Scales: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(12), 1263-1289.
3. Archer, J., & Graham-Kevan, N. (2003). Do beliefs about aggression predict physical aggression to partners? Aggressive Behavior, 29, 41-54.
4. Ashcraft, M. H. (1989). Human memory and cognition. Boston: Scott, Foresman.
5. Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023-1053.
6. Bargh, J.-A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation and action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
7. Bower, M. E., & Knutson, J. F. (1996). Attitudes toward physical discipline as a function of disciplinary history and self-labelling as physically abused. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20(8), 689-699.
8. Bugental, D. B. (1992). Affective and cognitive processes within threat-oriented family systems. In I. E. Sigel, A. V. McGillicuddy-DeLisi, & J. J. Goodnow (Eds.), Parental belief systems: The psychological consequences for children (2nd ed., pp. 219-248). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Bugental, D. B. (1993). Communication in abusive relationships. American Behavioral Scientist, 36(3), 288-308.
10. Bugental, D. B., & Happaney, K. (2000). Parent-child interaction as a power context. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(3), 267-282.
11. Bugental D. B., & Johnston, C. (2000). Parental and child cognitions in the context of family. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 315-344.
12. Bugental, D. B., & Martorell, G. (1999). Competition between friends: The joint influence of the perceived power of self, friends and parents. Journal of Family Psychology, 13(2), 260-273.
13. Burnett, D. B. (1993). The psychological abuse of latency age children: A survey. Child Abuse and Neglect, 17(4), 441-454.
14. Cantin, S. (1994). La violence envers les femmes: Y-a-t-il abus dans la maniere de la definir et de la mesurer? Informell, 4, 4-7.
15. Cascardi, M., & Vivian, D. (1995). Context for specific episodes of marital violence: Gender and severity of violence differences. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 265-293.
16. Chamberland, C. (2003). Violence parentale et violence conjugate: Des réalités plurielles, multidimensionnelles et interrelié es. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
17. Chamberland, C., Damant, D., Malo, C., Jacob, M., & Lavergne, C. (1999). Développement et manifestation de la victimisation des femmes et des enfants au sein d'une même famille: Analyse des dynamiques interactionnelles et des structures de pouvoir. Point de vue desjeunes, des mères et des pères. Research project submitted to the Social Science and Human Research of Canada.
18. Chamberland, C., Fortin, A., & Laporte, L. (in press). Links between violent behaviors and cognitions about domestic and parental violence. Journal of Family Violence.
19. Chamberland, C., Fortin, A., Turgeon, J., Laporte, L., & Léveillée, S. (2003). Les cognitions familiales et la violence faire aux femmes et aux enfants (Research report). Montreal: Institut de recherche pour le développement social des jeunes.
20. Dobash R. P., Dobash, R. E., Cavanagh, K., & Lewis, R. (2000). Changing violent men. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Dodge, K.A., Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., & Valente, E. (1995). Social information-processing patterns partially mediate the effect of early physical abuse on later conduct problems. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104(4), 632-643.
22. Ehrensaft, M. K., & Vivian, D. (1999). Is partner aggression related to appraisals of coercive control by a partner? Journal of Family Violence, 14, 251-267.
23. Fernet, M. (2005). Amour, violence et adolescence. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
24. Finchman, F. D., Bradbury, T. N., & Scott, C. K. (1990). Cognition in marriage. In F. D. Finchman & T. N. Bradbury (Eds.), The psychology of marriage: Basic issues and applications (pp. 118-149). New York: Guilford Press.
25. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26. Fortin, A., Chamberland, C., & Lachance, L. (2000). La justification de la violence envers les enfants: Un facteur de risque de la violence. Revue Internationale de l'Éducation Familiale, 4(2), 5-34.
27. Fortin, A., & Lachance, L. (1996). Mesure de la justification de la violence envers les enfants: Etude de la validation auprès d'une population québécoise. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 31, 91-104.
28. Goldstein, D., & Rosenbaum, A. (1985). An evaluation of the self-esteem of maritally violent men. Family Relations, 34, 425-428.
29. Gondolf, E. W. (2002). Batterer interaction systems: Issues, outcomes and recommendations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Greenblat, C. S. (1983). The salience of sexuality in the early years of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45(2), 289-299.
31. Higgins, E. T., & King, G. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information-processing consequences of individual and contextual variables. In N. Cantor & J. F. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction (pp. 69-122). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1991). Applying the social information processing model to maritally violent men. The Behavior Therapist, 14, 129-132.
33. Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1992). Social skill deficits in maritally violent men: Interpreting the data using a social information processing model. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 605-617.
34. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Hutchinson, G. (1993). Attributing negative intent to wife behavior: The attributions of maritally violent versus nonviolent men. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 206-211.
35. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Smutzler, N. (1996). Comparing the emotional reactions and behavioral intentions of violent and nonviolent husbands to aggressive, distressed and other wife behaviors. Violence and Victims, 11, 319-330.
36. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Stuart, G. L. (1994). The relationship standards and assumptions of violent versus nonviolent husbands. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 18(2), 87-103.
37. Knutson, J. F., & Selner, M. B. (1994). Punitive childhood experiences reported by young adults over a 10-year period. Child Abuse and Neglect, 18(2), 155-166.
38. Laporte, L., & Chamberland, C. (2002). Les cognitions des jeunes à l'égard de la violence dans les relations amoureuses. Montreal: Atelier Jeunes-Cité des Prairies.
39. Malo, C., Chamberland, C., Laporte, L., Moreau, J., & Paquette, D. (2002). Émotions et processus cognitifs chez des mères adolescentes à risque de mauvais traitements envers leur enfant (Final report). Montreal: Institut de recherche en développement social des jeunes.
40. Margolin, G., John, R. S., & Gleberman, L. (1988). Affective responses to conflictual discussions in violent and non violent couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 24-33.
41. Markus, H., & Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindsay & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 137-236). New York: Random House.
42. Mickey, R. M., Dunn, O. J., & Clark, V. A. (2004). Applied statistics: Analysis of variance and regression (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
43. Miller, J., & Bukva, K. (2001). Intimate violence perceptions. Young adult's judgments of abuse escalating from verbal arguments. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(2), 133-150.
44. Mouradian, V. E. (2001). Applying schema theory to intimate aggression: Individual and gender differences in representation of context and goals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 376-408.
45. Ouellet, F., Lindsay, J., & Saint-Jacques, M. C. (1994). Une évaluation de programme à multiple facettes: L'intervention auprès de conjoints violents. Santé Mental Québec, 19, 195-224.
46. Ouellet, P., & Clément, M. (1996). Les représentations de la violence selon le genre. Dans R Ouellet & M. Clément, Violences dans les relations affectives: représentations et interventions. Montreal, Québec: CRI-VIPP [Centre de recherche et d'intervention sur la violence familiale et faites aux femmes].
47. Pelletier, L. G., & Vallerand, R. J. (1994). Les perceptions et les cognitions sociales: Percevoir les gens qui nous entourent et penser a eux. In Dans R. J. Vallerand (Ed.), Les fondements de la psychologie sociale (pp. 193-258). Montreal: Gaćtan Morin.
48. Poulin, C., Lefebvre, C., & Bélanger, J. (1998). Évaluation participative de la priorité violence faite aux femmes. Montreal: Direction de la santé publique, Régie régionale de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal-Centre.
49. Ptacek, J. (1988). The clinical literature on men who batter: A review and critique. In G. T. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. T. Kirkpatrick, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), Family abuse and its consequences: New directions in research (pp. 149-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50. Roy, B., & Rondeau, G. (1997). Le contrôle exercé sur la conjointe: Comparaison de quatre groupe d'hommes. Criminologie, 30, 47-65.
51. Stets, J. E. (1988). Domestic violence and control. New York: Springer-Verlag.
52. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.
53. Straus, M. A. (2005). Bibliography and tabular summary of publications on the revised conflict tactics scales. Durham: Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire.
54. Sugarman, D. B., & Hotaling, G. T. (1996). Intimate violence and social desirability: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(2), 275-290.
55. Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159-177.
56. Tolman, R. M. (1992). Psychological abuse of women. In D. R. T. Ammerman & M. Hersen (Eds.), Assessment of family violence: A clinical and legal sourcebook (pp. 291-310). New York: Wiley.
57. Tonizzo, S., Howells, K., Day, A., Reidpath, D., & Froyland, I. (2000). Attributions of negative partner behavior by men who physically abuse their partners. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 155-167.
58. Turcotte, P. (2002). Points de vue de clients masculins sur leur processus de changement face à la violence conjugate. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
59. Turgeon, J., & Chamberland, C. (1994). Six scènes de la vie conjugate. Audiovisual Department, University of Montreal; Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women; Faculty of Arts and Science, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
60. Turgeon, J., Chamberland, C., & Pâquet-Deehy, A. (1992). Développement d'un outil audiovisuel à des fins de recherche et d'intervention en matière de violence conjugate (Research report). Montreal: University of Montreal.