Locating multiple interacting quantitative trait loci using robust model selection

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 51, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 6423-6434

  Baierl, Andreas ^a   Futschik, Andreas ^a   Bogdan, Małgorzata ^b   Biecek, Przemysław ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b WROCLAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

BIC; M estimates; Model selection; QTL mapping

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; CONFORMAL MAPPING; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; ROBUST CONTROL;

BAYESIAN INFORMATION CRITERION (BIC); M-ESTIMATES; MODEL SELECTION; QTL MAPPING;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 34547214434     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2007.02.010     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 19 (1974) 716-723
2. Baierl A., Bogdan M., Frommlet F., and Futschik A. On locating multiple interacting quantitative trait loci in intercross designs. Genetics 173 (2006) 1693-1703
3. Ball R. Bayesian methods for quantitative trait loci mapping based on model selection: approximate analysis using the Bayesian information criterion. Genetics 159 (2001) 1351-1364
4. Bassett G., and Koenker R. Asymptotic theory of least absolute error regression. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 73 (1978) 618-622
5. Benjamini Y., and Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 57 (1995) 289-300
6. Bogdan M., and Doerge R.W. Biased estimators of genetic effects and heritability in interval mapping. Heredity 95 (2005) 476-484
7. Bogdan M., Ghosh J.K., and Doerge R.W. Modifying the Schwarz Bayesian information criterion to locate multiple interacting quantitative trait loci. Genetics 167 (2004) 989-999
8. Broman, K.W., 1997. Identifying quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
9. Broman K.W., and Speed T.P. A model selection approach for the identification of quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 64 (2002) 641-656
10. Bussemaker, H.J., Li, H., Siggia, E.D., 2001. Regulatory element detection using correlation with expression. Nature Genetics 27, 167-171.
11. Carroll R.J. Robust methods for factorial experiments with outliers. Appl. Statist. 29 (1980) 246-251
12. Chardon F., Virlon B., Moreau L., Falque M., Joets J., Decousset L., Murigneux A., and Charcosset A. Genetic architecture of flowering time in maize as inferred from quantitative trait loci meta-analysis and synteny conservation with the rice genome. Genetics 168 (2004) 2169-2185
13. Dick D.M., and Foroud T. Genetic strategies to detect genes involved in alcoholism and alcohol-related traits. Alcohol Res. Health 26 (2002) 172-180
14. Doerge R.W. Mapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci in experimental populations. Natur. Rev. Genet. 3 (2002) 43-52
15. Doerge R.W., Zeng Z.-B., and Weir B.S. Statistical issues in the search for genes affecting quantitative traits in experimental populations. Statist. Sci. 12 (1997) 195-219
16. Fijneman R.J.A., de Vries S.S., Jansen R.C., and Demant P. Complex interactions of new quantitative trait loci, Sluc1, Sluc2, Sluc3, and Sluc4, that influence the susceptibility to lung cancer in the mouse. Natur. Genet. 14 (1996) 465-467
17. Fijneman R.J.A., Jansen R.C., Van der Valk M.A., and Demant P. High frequency of interactions between lung cancer susceptibility genes in the mouse: mapping of Sluc5 to Sluc14. Cancer Res. 58 (1998) 4794-4798
18. Huber P.J. Robust Statistics (1981), Wiley, New York
19. Jurečková J., and Sen P.K. Robust Statistical Procedures: Asymptotics and Interrelations (1996), Wiley, New York
20. Keles, S., van der Laan, M.J., Vulpe, C., 2004. Regulatory motif finding by logic regression. Bioinformatics 20, 2799-2811.
21. Khatkar M.S., Thomson P.C., Tammen I., and Raadsma H.W. Quantitative trait loci mapping in dairy cattle: review and meta-analysis. Genet. Sel. Evol. 36 (2004) 163-190
22. Lynch M., and Walsh B. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits (1998), Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
23. Machado J.A.F. Robust model selection and M-estimation. Econometric Theory 9 (1993) 478-493
24. Mähler M., Most C., Schmidtke S., Sundberg J.P., Li R., Hendrich H.J., and Churchill G.A. Genetics of colitis susceptibility in IL-10-deficient mice: backcross versus F2 results contrasted by principal component analysis. Genomics 80 (2002) 274-282
25. Martin R.D. Robust estimation of autoregressive models. In: Brillinger D.R., and Tiao G.C. (Eds). Directions in Time Series (1980), Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, CA 228-262
26. Philips T. Animal models for the genetic study of human alcohol phenotypes. Alcohol Res. Health 26 (2002) 202-207
27. Piepho H.-P., and Gauch Jr. H.G. Marker pair selection for mapping quantitative trait loci. Genetics 157 (2001) 433-444
28. Ronchetti E. Robust model selection in regression. Statist. Probab. Lett. 3 (1985) 21-23
29. Ronchetti E., Field Ch., and Blanchard W. Robust model selection by cross-validation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 92 (1997) 1017-1023
30. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Statist. 6 (1978) 461-464
31. Serfling R. Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics (1980), Wiley, New York
32. Siegmund D. Model selection in irregular problems: applications to mapping quantitative trait loci. Biometrika 91 (2004) 785-800
33. Thompson, E.A., 2000. Statistical inferences from genetic data on pedigress. In: NSF-CBMS Regional Conference Series in Probability and Statistics, vol. 6. IMS, Beachwood, OH.
34. Walling G.A., Visscher P.M., Andersson L., Rotschild M.F., Wang L., Moser G., Groenen M.A.M., Bidanel J.-P., Cepica S., Archibald A.L., Geldermann H., de Koning D.J., Milan D., and Haley C.S. Combining analyses of data from quantitative trait loci mapping studies: chromosome 4 effects of porcine growth and fatness. Genetics 155 (2000) 1369-1378
35. Yohai V.J. High breakdown-point and high efficiency robust estimates for regression. Ann. Statist. 15 (1985) 642-656