Problems with using a supervisor's report as a form of summative assessment

Postgraduate Medical Journal

Volumn 83, Issue 981, 2007, Pages 504-506

  Wilkinson, Tim J ^a,c   Wade, Winnie B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS   (United Kingdom)

^c PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CURRICULUM; HALO EFFECT; LEARNING; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; SHORT SURVEY; WORKPLACE;

CLINICAL MEDICINE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; RECORDS; TEACHING; WORKPLACE;

EID: 34547198898     PISSN: 00325473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2007.058982     Document Type: Short Survey

References (16)

1. Grant J, Kilminster S, Jolly B, et al. Clinical supervision of SpRs: where does it happen, when does it happen and is it effective? Med Educ 2003;37:140-8.
2. Holmboe ES, Bowen JL, Green M, et al. Reforming internal medicine residency training. A report from the Society of General Internal Medicine's Task Force for Residency Reform. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:1165-72.
3. Kachalia A, Studdert DM. Professional liability issues in graduate medical education. JAMA 2004;292:1051-6.
4. Capozzi JD, Rhodes R. Decisions regarding resident advancement and dismissal. J Bone Joint Surg 2005;87:2353-5.
5. Daelmans HE, Hoogenboom RJ, Donker AJ, et al. Effectiveness of clinical rotations as a learning environment for achieving competences. Medical Teacher 2004;26:305-12.
6. Irby DM, Milam S. The legal context for evaluating and dismissing medical students and residents. Acad Med 1989;64:639-43.
7. Beckwith NE, Lehmann DR. The importance of halo effects in multi-attribute attitude models. J Marketing Res 1975;12:265-75.
8. Feeley TH. Evidence of halo effects in student evaluations of communication instruction. Communication Education 2002;51:225-36.
9. van der Vleuten CPM, Norman GR, De Graaff E. Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of reliability. Med Educ 1991;25:110-18.
10. Wilkinson TJ, Frampton CM, Thompson-Fawcett MW, et al. Objectivity in objective structured clinical examinations: checklists are no substitute for examiner commitment. Acad Med 2003;78:219-23.
11. Hodges B, Regehr G, McNaughton N, et al. OSCE checklists do not capture increasing levels of expertise. Acad Med 1999;74:1129-34.
12. Epstein RM. Assessment in Medical Education. N Engl J Med 2007;356:387-96.
13. Modernising medical careers. Assessment. http://www.mmc.nhs.uk/ pages/assessment (Accessed 13 June 2007).
14. Lockyer J. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 2003;23:4-12.
15. Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Duffy FD, et al. The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:476- 81.
16. Bolsin S, Patrick A, Creati B, et al. Electronic incident reporting and professional monitoring transforms culture. BMJ 2004;329:51-2.