Professional liability issues in graduate medical education

JAMA

Volumn 292, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1051-1056

  Kachalia, Allen ^a   Studdert, David M ^b  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINUING EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LEGAL LIABILITY; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NEGLIGENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENT; REVIEW; WORK SCHEDULE;

EID: 4344584522     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.9.1051     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Miller FH, Greaney TL. The national resident matching program and antitrust law. JAMA. 2003;289:913-918.
2. Whetsell JF. Changing the law, changing the culture: rethinking the "sleepy resident" problem. Ann Health Law. 2003;12:23-73.
3. Brubaker B. Payments go under a microscope; health insurers take close look at doctors' reimbursement claims. Washington Post. January 12, 2004:E1.
4. Friedrich MJ. Health care practitioners and organizations prepare for approaching HIPAA deadlines. JAMA. 2001;286:1563-1565.
5. Roberts RG. Taming the malpractice wildfire: physicians, patients and the public can cool the flames of litigation. Postgrad Med. 2003;114:9-10.
6. Studdert DM, Mello MM, Brennan TA. Medical malpractice. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:283-292.
7. Mello MM, Studdert DM, Brennan TA. The new medical malpractice crisis. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2281-2284.
8. Schoenbaum SC, Bovbjerg RR. Malpractice reform must include steps to prevent medical injury. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:51-53.
9. Merenstein D. Winners and losers. JAMA. 2004;291:15-16.
10. Berenson RA, Kuo S, May JH. Medical Malpractice Liability Crisis Meets Markets: Stress in Unexpected Places: Issue Brief No. 68. Center for Studying Health System Change. Available at: http://www.hschange.org/CONTENT/605/. Accessed July 19, 2004.
11. Charles SC. Coping with a medical malpractice suit. West J Med. 2001;174:55-58.
12. National Practitioner Data Bank Public Use Data File. Available at: http://www.npdb-hipdb.com/publicdata.html. Accessed June 14, 2004.
13. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Medical Liability. Professional liability coverage for residents and fellows. Pediatrics. 2000;106:605-609.
14. ACGME Institutional Requirements. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Web site. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/. Accessed January 7, 2004.
15. Charles SC. Malpractice suits: their effect on doctors, patients, and families. J Med Assoc Ga. 1987;76:171-172.
16. Charles SC, Wilbert JR, Franke KJ. Sued and non-sued physicians' self-reported reactions to malpractice litigation. Am J Psychiatry. 1985;142:437-440.
17. Helms LB, Helms CM, Biggs S. Litigation in medical education: retrospect and prospect. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1995;11:317-376.
18. McBride v United States, 462 F2d 72 (9th Cir 1972).
19. Loudon v Scott, 194 P 488 (Mont 1920).
20. Ward JL. Medical residents: should they be held to a different standard of care? J Leg Med. 2001;22:283-298.
21. Rush v Akron General Hospital, 171 NE2d 378 (Ohio Ct App 1957).
22. St. Germain v Pfeifer, 637 NE2d 848 (Mass 1994).
23. Jenkins v Clark, 454 NE2d 541 (Ohio Ct App 1982).
24. Baccari v Donat, 741 A2d 262 (RI 1999).
25. Valentine v Kaiser Foundation Hospital, 15 Cal Rptr 26 (Cal Ct App 1961).
26. Parmelee v Kline, 579 So2d 1008 (La Ct App 1991).
27. Felice v Valleylab, Inc., 520 So2d 920 (La Ct App 1988).
28. Jistarri v Nappi, 549 A2d 210 (Pa Super Ct 1988).
29. Gates v Harris, 29 Phila Co Rptr 94 (Pa CP 1995).
30. Yungtum JR. Medical malpractice: The "captain of the ship" sets sail in Nebraska: Long v Hacker. Creighton Law Rev. 1995;29:379.
31. Voss v Bridwell, 364 P2d 955 (Kan 1961).
32. Harris v Miller, 438 SE2d 731 (NC 1994).
33. Oberzan v Smith, 869 P2d 682 (Kan 1994).
34. McConnell v Williams, 65 A2d 243 (Pa 1949).
35. Shull v Schwartz, 73 A2d 402 (Pa 1950).
36. Truhitte v French Hospital, 128 Cal App 3d 348 (Cal Ct App 1982).
37. Brown v Flowe, 496 SE2d 830 (NC Ct App 1998).
38. Moeller v Hauser, 54 NW2d 639 (Minn Ct App 1952).
39. McCullough v Hutzel Hospital, 276 NW2d 569 (Mich Ct App 1979).
40. Morris v Francisco, 708 P2d 498 (Kan 1985).
41. Cole v Tennessee, 1998 Tenn App LEXIS 485 (Tenn Ct App 1998).
42. Lownsbury v VanBuren, 762 NE2d 354 (Ohio 2001).
43. Prosise v Foster, 544 SE2d 331 (Va 2001).
44. Mozingo v Pitt County Memorial Hospital, 415 SE2d 341 (NC 1992).
45. Sterling v Johns Hopkins Hospital, 802 A2d 440 (Md Ct Spec App 2002).
46. Helling v Carey, 519 P2d 981 (Wash 1974).
47. Peters PG. The role of the jury in modern malpractice law. Iowa Law Rev. 2002;87:909-969.
48. Blendon RJ, DesRoches CM, Brodie M, et al. Views of practicing physicians and the public on medical errors. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1933-1940.
49. Campbell v Hospital Service District No. 1, 768 So2d 803 (La Ct App 2000).
50. Kelley v Rossi, 481 NE2d 1340 (Mass 1985).
51. County of Riverside v Loma Linda University, 173 Cal Rptr 371 (Cal Ct App 1981).
52. St. Joseph Hospital v Wolff, 94 SW3d 513 (Tex 2000).
53. Themins v Emanuel Lutheran Charity Board, 637 P2d 155 (Or Ct App 1981).
54. Dang v St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, 490 NW2d 653 (Minn Ct App 1992).
55. Brickner v Normandy Osteopathic Hospital, 746 SW2d 108 (Mo Ct App 1988).
56. Torry S. Malpractice settlement sets off dispute over doctors' databank. Washington Post. April 1, 1991:F5.
57. Prager LO. Data bank seeks more reports. American Medical News. March 22/29, 1999:1,57.
58. Swidryk v St. Michael's Medical Center, 201 A2d 641 (NJ Sup Ct 1985).
59. Moore v Vanderloo, 386 NW2d 108 (Iowa 1986).
60. Siebe v University of Cincinnati, 766 NE2d 1070 (Ohio Ct CI 2001).
61. Maxwell v Cole, 482 NYS2d 1000 (NY Sup Ct 1984).
62. Santos v Cohen, 706 NE2d 658 (Mass 1999).
63. Asch DA, Parker RM. The Libby Zion case: one step forward or two steps backward? N Engl J Med. 1988;318:771-775.