Convergent validity between two motor tests: Movement-ABC and PDMS-2

Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 59-69

  Van Waelvelde, Hilde ^a   Peersman, Wim ^a   Lenoir, Mattieu ^a   Engelsman, Bouwien C M Smits ^b,c,d  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c AVANS UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547184539     PISSN: 07365829     EISSN: 15432777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/apaq.24.1.59     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barnett, A., & Peters, J. (2004). Motor proficiency assessment batteries. In D. Dewey & D. Tupper (Eds.), Developmental motor disorders: A neuropsychological perspective. (pp. 66-113). New-York: Guilford.
2. Burton, A.W., & Miller D.E. (1998). Movement skill assessment. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
3. Burton, A.W., & Rodgerson, R.W. (2001). New perspectives on the assessment of movement skills and motor abilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18, 347-365.
4. Crawford, S.G., Wilson, B.N., & Dewey, D. (2001). Identifying developmental coordination disorder: Consistency between tests. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 20, 29-50.
5. Chow, S.M.K., & Henderson, S.E. (2003). Interrater and test-retest reliability of the Movement Assessment Battery for Chinese Preschool Children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 574-577.
6. Chow, S.M.K., Hsu, Y., Henderson, S.E., Barnett, A., & Kai Lo, S. (2006). The Movement ABC: A cross-cultural comparison of pre-school children from Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the USA. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 23, 31-48.
7. Croce, R.V., Horvat, M., & McCarthy, E. (2001). Reliability and concurrent validity of the movement assessment battery for children. Perceptual Motor Skills, 93, 275-280.
8. Folio, M.R., & Fewell, R.R. (1983). Peabody Developmental Motor Scales and Activity Cards. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
9. Folio, M.R., & Fewell, R.R. (2000). Peabody Developmental Motor Scales -2. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
10. Geuze, R.H., Jongmans, M.J., Schoemaker, M.M., & Smits-Engelsman, B.C.M. (2001). Clinical and research diagnostic criteria for developmental coordination disorder: A review and discussion. Human Movement Science, 20, 7-47.
11. Henderson, S.E., & Sugden D.A. (1992). Movement Assessment Battery for Children: Manual. London: Psychological Corporation.
12. Henderson, S. & Henderson L. (2002). Toward an understanding of Developmental Coordination Disorder. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 12-31.
13. Jongmans, M.J. (2005). Early identification of children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. In D.Sugden, & M. Chambers (Eds.), Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (pp. 155-167). London & Philadelphia: Whurr Publishers.
14. Kaplan, B.J., Dewey, D.M., Crawford, S.G., & Wilson, B.N. (2001). The term comorbidity is of questionable value in reference to developmental disorders: Data and theory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 555-565.
15. Larkin, D., & Rose, E. (2005). Assessment of Developmental Coordination Disorder. In D.Sugden, & M. Chambers (Eds.), Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (pp. 135-154). London & Philadelphia: Whurr Publishers.
16. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
17. Polatajko, H.J. (1999). Developmental coordination disorder (DCD): Alias the clumsy child syndrome. In K. Whitmore & G. Willems (Eds.), Neurodevelopmental approach to specific learning disorders. Clinics in Developmental Medicine No. 145 (pp. 119-133). London: McKeith Press.
18. Schoemaker, M.M., Smits-Engelsman, B.M., & Jongmans M. (2003). Psychometric properties of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children - checklist as a screening instrument for children with developmental coordination disorder. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 425-441.
19. Smits-Engelsman, B.C. (1998). Movement Assesment Battery for Children. Handleiding. Lisse: Swets.
20. Smits-Engelsman, B.C.M., Henderson, S.E., & Michels C.G.J. (1998). The assessment of children with Developmental Coordination Disorders in the Netherlands: The relationship between the Movement Assessment Battery for Children and the Körperkoördinations Test für Kinder. Human Movement Science, 17, 699-709.
21. Tieman, B.L., Palisano, R.J., & Sutlive, A.C. (2005). Assessment of motor development and function in preschool children. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 11, 189-196.
22. Van Hartingsveldt, M.J., Cup, E.H., Oostendorp, R.A. (2005). Reliability and validity of the fine motor scale of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2. Occupational Therapy International, 12, 1-13.
23. Van Waelvelde, H., De Weerdt, W., De Cock, P. & Smits-Engelsman, B.C.M. (2004). Aspects of concurrent validity of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children. Human Movement Science, 23, 49-60.
24. Van Waelvelde, H., Peersman, W., Lenoir, M., & Smits-Engelsman, B.C.M. (in press). Reliability of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children for preschool children with mild to moderate motor impairment. Clinical Rehabilitation.
25. Van Waelvelde, H., Peersman, W., Lenoir, M., & Smits-Engelsman, B.C.M. (2007) The Movement Assessment Battery for Children: Educational differences between the results of 4- and 5-year-old children from Flanders, the Netherlands and the USA. Manuscript submitted for publication.
26. Wedell, K., & Raybounc, E.C. (Eds.) (1976). The early identification of educationally "at risk" children. Educational Review. Occasional publications, number 6. University of Birmingham.
27. Yun, J. & Ulrich, D. A. (2002). Estimating measurement validity: A tutorial. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 32-47.