Refusing to believe it: Considerations on public speaking instruction in a post-machiavellian moment

Social Epistemology

Volumn 11, Issue 3-4, 1997, Pages 253-314

  Fusfield, William D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011198556     PISSN: 02691728     EISSN: 14645297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02691729708578849     Document Type: Note

References (106)

1. HOWE, N. and STRAUSS, B., in 13thGen: Abort, Retry, Ignore, Fail? (New York: Vintage Books) 1993, p. 213.
2. BOOTH, W. 'Rhetoric and reality; or, my basics are more basic than your basics', in The Vocation of a Teacher: Rhetorical Occasions 1967-1988 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press) 1988, p. 44.
3. HOWE and STRAUSS (1993), p. 17 (see note 1).
4. BERCOVITCH, S. The Rites of Assent (New York: Routledge) 1993, p. 61.
5. POSTMAN, N. and WEINGARTNER, C. Teaching as a Subversive Activity (New York: Dell Publishing) 1969, p. 14.
6. BOOTH, (1988) (see note 2).
7. BOOTH'S CH agenda was rejected especially strongly by my foreign students. I suspect this was because they did not grow up in cultures as deeply permeated by CH assumptions as our own.
8. CLARK, R. The Fire This Time: U.S. War Crimes in the Gulf New York: Thunder Mouth Press 1992, pp. 208-209.
9. BOOTH (1988), p. 42 (see note 2).
10. POCOCK, J. G. A. 'Civic humanism and its role in Anglo-American thought', in Politics, Language and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History (New York: Atheneum Press) 1971, p. 85.
11. POCOCK, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Theory and the Atlantic Republican Tradition (Princeton: Princeton University Press) 1975, pp. vii-x.
12. POCOCK(1975), pp. vii-x (see note 22).
13. POCOCK(1975), p. 85 (see note 21).
14. J. Herson The Portable Jefferson, edited by M. D. PETERSON (New York: Viking Press) 1975, p. 213.
15. BOOTH (1988), pp. 40-41 and p. 59 (see note 2)
16. BOOTH, pp. 86, 88.
17. BOOTH, p. 140.
18. BOOTH (1988), p. 44 (see note 2)
19. BOOTH, pp. 38-41.
20. BOOTH(1988), p. 41 (see note 2).
21. BOOTH(1988), p. 42 (see note 2).
22. BOOTH, (1988), p. 74 (see note 2).
23. BOOTH(1988), p. 74 (see note 2).
24. BOOTH(1988), p. 44 (see note 2).
25. POCOCK (1975) p. 513 (see note 22)
26. POSTMAN and WEIGNRTNER, p. 14.
27. BOOTH (1988), p. 75 (see note 2).
28. Cf. BOOTH (1988), p. 83 (see note 2)
29. BOOTH (1988), p. 23 (see note 2).
30. POCOCK (1971), pp. 100-101 (see note 21).
31. BERCOVITCH, S. The American Jeremiad (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press) 1978, pp. 176-210.
32. POCOCK (1971), p. 91 (see note 21).
33. WINTHROP, J. 'Christian charitie: A modell hereof, in E. S. MORGAN (ed.), Puritan Political Ideas (Indianapolis) Bobbs-Merrill 1964, pp. 92-93.
34. HATCH, The Sacred Cause of Liberty; Republican Thought and the Millennium in Revolutionary New England (New Haven; Yale U.P.N.) 1977.
35. POCOCK, (1971), p. 94 (see note 21).
36. BERCOVITCH (1978), p. 4 (see note 39).
37. BERCOVITCH (1978), p. 9, (see note 39)
38. WINTHROP(1964), pp. 76-93 (see note 42).
39. Miller, cited by BERCOVITCH (1978), pp. 9-10 (see note 39).
40. BERCOVITCH (1978), p. 7 (see note 39).
41. BERCOVITCH (1978), p. 23 (see note 39).
42. BERCOVITCH (1978), p. xiv (see note 39).
43. BERCOVITCH (1978), p. xiv (see note 39).
44. SPROULE, J. M. Teaching public speaking as public life, paper presented at the SCA Annual Convention, Atlanta, 1 November 1991, p. 1.
45. SPROULE (1991), p. 1 (see note 61).
46. SPROULE (1991), p. 1 (see note 61).
47. SPROULE (1991), p. 16 (see note 61).
48. SPROULE (1991), p. 16 (see note 61).
49. POCOCK (1975), p. 508 (see note 22).
50. POCOCK (1975), p. 509 (see note 22).
51. POCOCK, (1975), p. 509 (see note 22).
52. SPROULE (1991), p. 16 (see note 61).
53. POCOCK (1975), p. 526 (see note 22).
54. POCOCK, p. 509.
55. POCOCK (1975), p. 526 (see note 22).
56. LIPPMANN, W. The Phantom Public Sphere (New York: Macmillan) 1926, p. 48.
57. Cf. BUELL, L. New England Literary Culture: From Revolution through Renaissance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1986, pp. 163-165.
58. Cf. BUELL, pp. 146-147.
59. COMBS, J. E. and NIMMO, D. The New Propaganda: The Dictatorship of Palaver in Contemporary Politics (New York: Longman Press) 1993.
60. ELLUL, J. Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes (New York: Vintage) 1965, pp. 9-17 and pp. 105-117.
61. T. LUKE, cited by WEXLER, P. in 'Televisual democracy and the politics of democracy', Telos, 70 (Winter), 59-79.
62. Cf. Alice Crawford, "Critique and Reproduction," this issue, p. 315.
63. LIPPMANN (1926), p. 20 (see note 78).
64. 85.LIPPMANN(1926), p. 42 (see note 78).
65. LIPPMANN (1926), p. 39 (see note 78).
66. LIPPMANN (1926), p. 65 (see note 78).
67. LIPPMANN (1926), p. 39 (see note 78).
68. LIPPMANN (1926), p. 38 (see note 78).
69. LIPPMANN (1926), p. 74 (see note 78).
70. HERMAN, E. S. and CHOMSKY, N. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media (New York: Pantheon Books) 1988, pp. 1-35.
71. HERMAN and CHOMSKY (1988), p. 2 (see work 92).
72. HERMAN and CHOMSKY (1988), p. xii (see note 92).
73. HERMAN and CHOMSKY (1988), pp. 18-25 (see note 92).
74. ELLUL (1965), p. 47 (see note 81).
75. MAROUSE (1964), pp. 94-103 and pp. 123-199 (see note 75).
76. TOCQUEVILLE, A., Democracy in America (New York: Trans H. Reeve) 1961.
77. BELLAH, R., Habits of the Heart, p. 30.
78. SCHOR, J. B. The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure (New York: Basic Books) 1991.
79. TOCQUEVILLE (1800), vol 2, p. 487 (see note 98).
80. TOCQUEVILLE (1800), vol 2, p. 492 (see note 98).
81. TOCQUEVILLE (1800), vol 2, p. 240 (see note 98).
82. POCOCK (1971), p. 85 (see note 21).
83. POCOCK (1971), p. 90 (see note 21).
84. WEXLER, P. 'Citizenship in the semiotic society', in B. S. TURNER (ed.), Theories of Modernity and Postmodemity (Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications) 1990, p. 165.
85. PETERSON (1975), p. 537 (see note 25)
86. DEETZ, S. Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonization (Albany: SUNY Press) 1992.
87. JEFFERSON(1961) vol 2, p. 384 (see note 98)
88. Mill, J. S. 'Considerations on representative government', p. 208.
89. CHANNING, W. E. 'Self-culture' in The Works of William E. Channing, D.D. (Boston: American Unitarian Association) 1877, p. 16.
90. CHANNING (1877), p. 27 (see note 112).
91. CHANNING (1877), p. 27 (see note 112).
92. JEFFERSON (1975), p. 217 (see note 25).
93. JEFFERSON (1975), p. 217 (see note 25).
94. JAMESON, F. 'The cultural logic of late capitalism' in Postmodemity: The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (Durham: Duke University Press) 1991, pp. 1-54.
95. BOOTH (1988), p. 57 (see note 2).
96. BERCOVITCH(1978), p. 188 (see note 39).
97. BERCOVITCH (1993), pp. 61-63 (see note 4).
98. BOOTH (1988), pp. 22-23 (see note 2).
99. BOOTH (1988), p. xvi (see note 2).
100. BOOTH (1988), p. 78 (see note 2).
101. BOOTH (1988), p. 83 (see note 2).
102. FIEDLER, L. 'Why was criticism?', in What Was Literature: Class Culture and Mass Society (New York: Simon and Schuster) 1983, pp. 98-99.
103. BOOTH (1988), p. 9 (see note 2).
104. BOOTH (1988), p. 9 (see note 2).' 134.
105. POCOCK (1971), pp. 100-101 (see note 21).
106. BITZER, L. 'The rhetorical situation' in Philosophy and Rhetoric 1 (PA: Penn State University Press) 1968, pp. 1-14.