A semi-parametric approach for mixture models: Application to local false discovery rate estimation

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 51, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 5483-5493

  Robin, Stéphane ^a   Bar Hen, Avner ^a   Daudin, Jean Jacques ^a   Pierre, Laurent ^b  

^a AGROPARISTECH   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS OUEST NANTERRE LA DÉFENSE   (France)

Author keywords

False discovery rate; Mixture model; Multiple testing procedure; Semi parametric density estimation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY;

FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; MIXTURE MODELS; MULTIPLE TESTING PROCEDURE; SEMI PARAMETRIC DENSITY ESTIMATION;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

EID: 34547172786     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2007.02.028     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Allison D.B., Gadbury G., Heo M., Fernandez J., Lee C.-K., Prolla T.A., and Weindruch R.A. Mixture model approach for the analysis of microarray gene expression data. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 39 (2002) 1-20
2. Aubert J., Bar-Hen A., Daudin J.-J., and Robin S. Determination of the regulated genes in microarray experiments using local FDR. BMC Bioinformatics 5 125 (2004) 1. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/5/125/ 〈http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/5/125/〉
3. Benjamini Y., and Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. JRSSB 57 1 (1995) 289-300
4. Delmar P., Robin S., Le Roux D., and Daudin J.-J. Mixture model on the variance for the differential analysis of gene expression. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. C 54 1 (2005) 31-50
5. Di Marzio M., and Taylor C. Boosting kernel density estimates: a bias reduction technique?. Biometrika 91 (2004) 226-233
6. Efron B. Large-scale simultaneous hypothesis testing: the choice of a null hypothesis. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 99 465 (2004) 96-104
7. Efron B., and Tibshirani R. Using specially designed exponential families for density estimation. Ann. Statist. 24 6 (1996) 2431-2461
8. Efron B., Tibshirani R., Storey J.D., and Tusher V. Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 96 (2001) 1151-1160
9. Genovese C., and Wasserman L. Operating characteristics and extensions of the fdr procedure. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 64 1 (2002) 499-518
10. Hedenfalk, I., Duggan, D., Chen, Y.D., Radmacher, M., Bittner, M., Simon, R., Meltzer, P., Gusterson, B., Esteller, M., Kallioniemi, O.P., Wilfond, B., Borg, A., Trent, J., 2001. Gene expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer. New Engl. J. Med. (344), 539-548.
11. Hjort N.L., and Glad I.K. Nonparametric density estimation with a parametric start. Ann. Statist. 23 3 (1995) 882-904
12. Hoti F., and Holmström L. A semiparametric density estimation approach to pattern classification. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 37 (2004) 409-419
13. Liao J.G., Lin Y., Selvanayagam Z.E., and Weichung J.S. A mixture model for estimating the local false discovery rate in DNA microarray analysis. Bioinformatics 20 16 (2004) 2694-2701
14. McLachlan G., and Peel D. Finite Mixture Models (2000), Wiley, New York
15. McLachlan G., Bean R.W., and Ben-Tovim Jones L. A simple implementation of a normal mixture approach to differential gene expression in multiclass microarrays. Bioinformatics 22 (2006) 1608-1615
16. Olkin I., and Spiegelman C. A semiparametric approach to density estimation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 82 (1987) 858-865
17. Pounds S., and Morris S.W. Estimating the occurrence of false positives and false negatives in microarray studies by approximating and partitioning the empirical distribution of p-values. Bioinformatics 19 (2003) 1236-1242
18. Priebe C.E., and Marchette D.J. Alternating kernel and mixture density estimates. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 35 1 (2000) 43-65
19. Rudemo, M., Lobovkina, T., Mostad, P., Scheidl, S.J., Nilsson, S., Lindahl, P., 2002. Variance models for microarray data. Technical Report 6, Mathematical Statistics, Chalmers University of Technology. 〈http://www.math.chalmers.se/∼rudemo/〉.
20. Silverman B.W. Density Estimation (1986), Chapman & Hall, London
21. Smyth G.K. Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Statist. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 3 1 (2004) Article 3
22. Storey J.D., and Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genowide studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 16 (2003) 9440-9445
23. Storey J.D., Taylor J.E., and Siegmund D. Strong control, conservative point estimation, and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 66 1 (2004) 187-205