Measuring the blood pressure in both arms is of little use; longitudinal study into blood pressure differences between both arms and its reproducibility in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2;Weinig nut van bloeddrukmeting aan beide armen; longitudinale studie naar interarmbloeddrukverschillen en de reproduceerbaarheid daarvan bij patiënten met diabetes mellitus type 2

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Volumn 151, Issue 27, 2007, Pages 1509-1514

  Kleefstra, N ^a   Houweling, S T ^b   Meyboom de Jong, B ^c   Bilo, H J G ^a  

^a ISALA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b LANGERHANS MEDICAL RESEARCH GROUP   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OSCILLATION; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

AGED; ARM; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DIASTOLE; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTOLE;

EID: 34547146425     PISSN: 00282162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Walma EP, Thomas S, Prins A, Grundmeyer HGLM, Laan JR van der, Wiersma TJ. NHG-standaard Hypertensie (derde herziening). Huisarts Wet. 2003;46:435-49.
2. Bloeddrukmeting. CBO-richtlijn Hoge bloeddruk. Alphen aan den Rijn: Van Zuiden Communications; 2000. p. 33-42.
3. NHG-standaard Cardiovasculair risicomanagement. In: NHG-standaarden voor de huisarts 2007. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2006.
4. Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO, Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap. Multidisciplinaire richtlijn cardiovasculair risico-management 2006. Alphen aan den Rijn: Van Zuiden Communications; 2006.
5. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo jr JL, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206-52.
6. 1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension. Guidelines Subcommittee. J Hypertens. 1999;17:151-83.
7. Williams B, Poulter NR, Brown MJ, Davis M, McInnes GT, Potter JF, et al. Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the fourth working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004-BHS IV. British Hypertension Society. J Hum Hypertens. 2004;18:139-85.
8. European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology Guidelines Committee. 2003 European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2003;21:1011-53.
9. Harrison jr EG, Roth GM, Hines jr EA. Bilateral indirect and direct arterial pressures. Circulation. 1960;22:419-36.
10. Houweling ST. Taakdelegatie in de eerste- en tweedelijns diabetes-zorg: resultaten van de DISCOURSE-studies [proefschrift]. Hfdst 4. Zwolle: Isala klinieken; 2005.
11. Houweling ST, Kleefstra N, Lutgers HL, Groenier KH, Meyboom-de Jong B, Bilo HJG. Pitfalls in blood pressure measurement in daily practice. Fam Pract. 2006;23:20-7.
12. Cassidy P, Jones K. A study of inter-arm blood pressure differences in primary care. J Hum Hypertens. 2001;15:519-22.
13. Singer AJ, Hollander JE. Blood pressure. Assessment of interarm differences. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:2005-8.
14. Pesola GR, Pesola HR, Lin M, Nelson MJ, Westfal RE. The normal difference in bilateral indirect blood pressure recordings in hypertensive individuals. Acad EmergMed. 2002;9:342-5.
15. Pesola GR, Pesola HR, Nelson MJ, Westfal RE. The normal difference in bilateral indirect blood pressure recordings in normotensive individuals. Am J Emerg Med. 2001;19:43-5.
16. Lane D, Beevers M, Barnes N, Bourne J, John A, Malins S, et al. Interarm differences in blood pressure: when are they clinically significant? J Hypertens. 2002:20:1089-95.
17. Mendelson G, Nassimiha D, Aronow WS. Simultaneous measurements of blood pressures in right and left brachial arteries. Cardiol Rev. 2004;12:276-8.
18. Orme S, Ralph SG, Birchall A, Lawson-Matthew P, McLean K, Channer KS. The normal range for inter-arm differences in blood pressure. Age Ageing. 1999;28:537-42.
19. Fotherby MD, Panayiotou B, Potter JF. Age-related differences in simultaneous interarm blood pressure measurements. Postgrad Med J. 1993;69:194-6.
20. Gould BA, Hornung RS, Kieso HA, Altman DG, Raftery EB. Is the blood pressure the same in both arms? Clin Cardiol. 1985;8:423-6.
21. El Assaad MA, Topouchian JA, Asmar RG. Evaluation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol: the Omron M5-I and the Omron 705IT. Blood Press Monit. 2003;8:127-33.
22. O'Brien E. Replacing the mercury sphygmomanometer. Requires clinicians to demand better automated devices. BMJ. 2000;320:815-6.
23. O'Brien E, Waeber B, Parati G, Staessen J, Myers MG. Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension. BMJ. 2001;322:531-6.