Evaluation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol: The Omron M5-I and the Omron 705IT

Blood Pressure Monitoring

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 127-133

  El Assaad, Mohamed A ^a   Topouchian, Jirar A ^a   Asmar, Roland G ^a  

^a Cardiovascular Institute   (France)

Author keywords

Blood pressure; International protocol; Omron; Validation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BRACHIAL ARTERY; DEVICE; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPERTENSION; MALE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF EXAMINATION; SPHYGMOMANOMETER; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0042383300     PISSN: 13595237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00126097-200306000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Pickering T, Kaplan N, Krakoff L, Prisant L, Sheps S, Weber M, et al. Recommendations for the use of home (self) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Am J Hypertens 1996; 9:1-11.
2. White W. Out-of-office blood pressure monitoring. In: Izzo J, Black HR (editors): Hypertension primer. Second edition. Dallas: Council for High Blood pressure Research, American Heart Association; 1998. pp. 302-306.
3. Appel L, Stason W. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and blood pressure self-measurement in the diagnosis and management of hypertension. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118:867-882.
4. Haynes R, Sackett D, Gibson E, Taylor D, Hackett B, Roberts R, et al. Improvement of medication compliance in uncontrolled hypertension. Lancet 1996; ii: 1265-1268.
5. Thijs L, Staessen JA, Celis H, de Gaudemaius R, Imai Y, Julius S, et al. Reference values for self-recorded blood pressure. A meta-analysis of summary data. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158:481-488.
6. Asmar R, Zanchetti A. Guidelines for the use of self-blood pressure monitoring: a summary report of the first international consensus conference. J Hypertens 2000; 18:493-508.
7. O'Brien E, Atkins N, Mee F, O'Malley K. Comparative accuracy of six ambulatory devices according to blood pressure levels. J Hypertens 1993; 11:673-675.
8. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, Thomas M. Evaluation of three devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the revised British Hypertension Society Protocol: the Omron HEM-705CP, Philips HP5332, and Neissei DS-175. Blood Press Monit 1996; 1:55-61.
9. Foster C, McKinlay JM, Cruickshank JM, Coats AJS. Accuracy of the Omron HEM 706 portable monitor for home measurement of blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens 1994; 8:661-664.
10. Modesti PA, Costoli A, Cecioni I, Toccafondi S, Carnemolla A, Serneri GGN. Clinical evaluation of the QuietTrak blood pressure recorder according to the protocol of the British Hypertension Society. Blood Press Monit 1996; 1:63-68.
11. Cordoba R, Fuertes MI, Alvarez A, Molina L, Solans R, Melero I. Validation of a self-measuring blood pressure monitor: the Omron-HM 722C. Aten Primaria 1997; 20:247-250.
12. Bortolotto L, Henry O, Hanon O, Sikias P, Mourad JJ, Girerd X. Validation of the two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure by elderly patients according to the revised British Hypertension Society protocol: the Omron HEM-722C and HEM-735C. Blood Press Monit 1999; 4:21-25.
13. Naschitz JE, Loewenstein L, Lewis R, Keren D, Gaitini L, Tamir A, et al. Accuracy of the Omron M4 automatic blood pressure measuring device. J Hum Hypertens 2000; 14:423-427.
14. Mattu G, Perry T, Wright J. Comparison of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BPM-100beta) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer. Blood Press Monit 2001; 6:153-159.
15. White W, Anwar Y. Evaluation of the overall efficacy of the Omron office digital blood pressure HEM-907 monitor in adults. Blood Press Monit 2001; 6:107-110.
16. El Assaad M, Topouchian J, Darné B, Asmar R. Validation of the Omron HEM-907 device for blood pressure measurement. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7:237-241.
17. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler WA, de Swiet M, Padfield PL, O'Malley K, et al. The British Hypertension Society Protocol for the evaluation of automated and semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems. J Hypertens 1990; 8:607-619.
18. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler WA, de Swiet M, Padfield PL, Altman D, et al. The British Hypertension Society Protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens 1993; 11 (Suppl 2):S43-S62.
19. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. The national standard of electronic or automated sphygmomanometers. Arlington, VA: AAMI; 1987.
20. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. American national standard: electronic or automated sphygmomanometers. Arlington, VA: AAMI; 1993.
21. O'Brien E, Pickering T, Asmar R, Myers M, Parati G, Staessen J, et al. Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7:3-17.
22. Groupe d'Evaluation et de Mesure de la Société Française d'Hypertension Artérielle. La prise de la tension artérielle au cabinet médical. Ed. RanD, Meudon, France.
23. Geddes LA, Voellz M, Combs C, Reiner D, Babbs CF. Characterization of the oscillometric method for measuring indirect blood pressure. Ann Biomed Eng 1982; 10:271-280.