Emerging policy challenges in intellectual disabilities

Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 188-194

  Fujiura, Glenn T ^a   Parish, Susan L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Demography; Families; Federalism; Policy analysis

Indexed keywords

CAREGIVER; CULTURAL FACTOR; DEMOGRAPHY; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; ECONOMIC ASPECT; FAMILY; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; IMMIGRATION; INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT; MEDICAID; ORGANIZATION; POLICY; POVERTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOCIAL ASPECT; UNITED STATES; WELFARE;

AGING; EMIGRATION AND IMMIGRATION; EMPLOYMENT; FAMILY; HUMANS; MENTAL RETARDATION; POLICY MAKING; POVERTY; PUBLIC POLICY;

EID: 34447617723     PISSN: 10804013     EISSN: 10982779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrdd.20152     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Altman BM. 2001. Disability definitions, models, classification schemes, and applications. In: Albrecht G, Seelman K, Bury M, editors. Handbook of Disability Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. p 97-122.
2. Beiser M, Hou F, Hyman I, Tousignant M. 2002. Poverty, family process, and the mental health of immigrant children in Canada. Am J Clin Nutr 92:220-227.
3. Benjamin AE, Wallace SP, Villa V, McCarthy K. 2000. California immigrants have mostly lower rates of disability and use of disability services than state's U.S.-born residents. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. Policy Brief PB00-2.
4. Bergsman S. 2002. Looking for labor. Lodging Magazine, September.
5. Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett (99-1240) 193 F.3d 1214.
6. Borjas GJ. 2003. The labor demand curve is downward sloping: Reexamining the impact of immigration on the labor market. Q J Econ 118:1335-1374.
7. Braddock D. 2007. Washington rises: public financial support for intellectual disability in the United States: 1955-2004. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 13:169-177.
8. Braddock D, Hemp R, Rizzolo MC, Parish S, Pomeranz A. 2002. The state of the states in developmental disabilities. In: Braddock D, editor. Disability at the dawn of the 21st Century. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation. p 83-350.
9. Bumpass LL. 1990. What's happening to the family? Interactions between demographic and institutional change. Demography 27:483-498.
10. Cahill TJ, Malloy B. 2004. Overcoming the obstacles of Garrett: An "as applied" saving contructon for the ADA's Title II. Wake Forest Law Rev 39:133-168.
11. Coates JF. 2000. Scenario planning. Technological forecasting and social change 65:115-123.
12. Congressional Budget Office. 2006. The Budget and Economic Oudook: A budget update August 2006. Washington, DC: The Congress of the United States.
13. Cornelius WA, Rosenblum MR. 2005. Immigration and politics. Annu Rev Polit Sci 8:99-119.
14. DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Lee CH. 2006. Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, P60-231.
15. Douglas-Hall A, Koball H. 2006. The new poor: regional trends in child poverty since 2000. New York, NY: National Center for Children in Poverty, Columbia University.
16. Dror Y. 1994. Basic concepts in advanced policy studies. In: Nagel SS, editor. Encyclopedia of Policy Studies. New York: Marcel Dekker. p 1-30.
17. Emerson E. 2007. Poverty and people with intellectual disabilities. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 13:107-113.
18. Employment Policy Foundation. 2001. Future labor and skill shortages jeopardize American prosperity. (Issue brief). Washington, DC: Author.
19. Executive Department, Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 2006. Ronmey signs landmark health insurance reform bill. Retrieved December 4, 2006 from http://www.mass.gov/?pageID=pressreleases&agId=Agov2&prModName= gov2pressrelease&prFile=gov_pr_060412_Healthcare_signing.xml
20. Fein D, Ooms T. 2006. What do we know about couples and marriage in disadvantaged populations? Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.
21. Fleniming KC, Evans JM, Chutka DS. 2003. Caregiver and clinician shortages in an aging nation. Mayo Clin Proc 78:1026-1040.
22. Flores G, Brotanek J. 2005. The healthy immigrant effect: a greater understanding might help us improve the health of all children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 159:295-297.
23. Folbre N. 2001. The invisible heart: economics and family values. New York: The New Press.
24. Franzmi L, Ribble JC, Keddie AM. 2001. Understanding the Hispanic paradox. Ethn Dis 11:496-518.
25. Freedman VA, Martin LG, Schoeni RF. 2002. Recent trends in disability and functioning among older adults in the United States: A systematic review. JAMA 288:3137-3146.
26. Fujiura GT. 1998. Demography of family households. Am J Ment Retard 103:225-235.
27. Fujiura GT. 2000. Implications of emerging demographics. J Disabil Pol Stud 11:66-75.
28. Fujiura GT, Braddock D. 1992. Fiscal and demographic trends in mental retardation services: the emergence of the family. In: Rowitz L, editor. Mental retardation in the Year 2000. New York: Springer-Verlag.
29. Fujiura GT, Yamaki K, Czechowicz S. 1998. Disability among ethnic and racial minorities in the United States. J Disabil Pol Stud 9:111-130.
30. Gruber J. 2004. Is making divorce easier bad for children? The long-run implications of unilateral divorce. J Labor Econ 22:799-833.
31. Heller T, Caldwell J, Factor A. 2007. Aging family caregivers: policies and practices. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 13:136-142.
32. Henshel RL. 1982. Sociology and social forecasting. Annu Rev Sociol 8:57-79.
33. Hernandez D. 2003. Changing family circumstances. In: Weissberg RP, Walberg HJ, O'Brien MU, Kuster CB, editors. Long-term trends in the well-being of children and youth. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America Press. p 115-179.
34. Hewitt A, Larson S. 2007. The direct support workforce in community supports to individuals with developmental disabilities: issues, implications and promising practices. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 13:178-187.
35. Hirschman C. 2006. The impact of immigration on American society: looking backward to the future. New York: Social Science Research Council.
36. Hodge P. 2004. Baby boomer public policy: a new vision. Harv Generations Pol J 1:7-21.
37. Holahan J, Wiener JM, Lutzky AW 2002. Health policy for low-income people: States' responses to new challenges. Health Aff 22:187-218.
38. Hoover GA. 2002. The impact of demographics on policy outcomes under varying institutional frameworks. Econ Polit 14:191-208.
39. Hooyman NR, Gonyea JG. 1995. Feminist perspectives on family care: policies for gender justice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40. Horrigan MW. 2004. Employment projections to 2012: concepts and context. Mon Labor Rev 130:3-22.
41. Janicki MP, Wisniewski HM. 1985. Aging and developmental disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
42. Kraft ME. 1994. Population policy. In: Nagel SS, editor. Encyclopedia of policy studies. New York: Marcel Dekker. p 617-642.
43. Krahn GL, Drum CE. 2007. Translating policy principles into practice to improve health care access for adults with intellectual disabilities: a research review of the past decade. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 13:160-168.
44. Larson SA, Hewitt A, Anderson L. 1999. Staff recruitment challenges and interventions in agencies supporting people with developmental disabilities. Ment Retard 37:36-46.
45. Lerman RI. 1996. The impact of the changing U.S. family structure on child poverty and income inequality. Economica 63:119-139.
46. Lichter DT. 1997. Poverty and inequality among children. Ann Rev Sociol 23:121-145.
47. Lloyd-Sherlock P. 2000. Population ageing in developed and developing regions: implications for health policy. Soc Sci Med 51:887-895.
48. Lowell BL. 2004. Skilled temporary and permanent immigrants in the United States. Popul Res Pol Rev 20:33-58.
49. Mansell J, Elliott T. 2001. Staff members' prediction of consequences for their work in residential settings. Am J Ment Retard 106:434-447.
50. Matthews H, Ewen D. 2006, November 1. Child care assistance in 2005: state cuts continue. Washington, DC: Center on Law and Social Policy.
51. Mautino KS. 2002a. Immigration and physical disability. J Immigrant Health 4:59-61.
52. Mautino KS. 2002b. Mental disability and immigration and physical disability. J Immigrant Health 4:121-123.
53. Mitchell D, Braddock D. 1993. Compensation and turnover of direct care staff in developmental disabilities residential facilities in the United States. I. Wages and benefits. Ment Retard 31:429-437.
54. Morales LS, Lara M, Kington RS, Valdez RO, Escarce JJ. 2002. Socioeconomic, cultural, and behavioral factors affecting Hispanic health outcomes. J Health Care Poor Underserved 13:477-503.
55. Mosisa AT. 2006. Foreign-born workforce, 2004. Mon Labor Rev 129:48-55.
56. Munger KM, Gill CJ, Ormond KE, Kirschner KL. 2007. The next exclusion debate: assessing technology, ethics, and intellectual disability after the Human Genome Project. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 13:121-128.
57. Nathan RP. 2005. Federalism and health policy. Health Aff 24:1458-1466.
58. National Center for Children in Poverty. 2006. Who are America's poor children? New York: Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University.
59. National Intelligence Council. 2000. Global trends 2015: a dialogue about the future with non-government experts. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
60. Palloni A, Morenoff J. 2001. Interpreting the paradoxical in the 'Hispanic Paradox': demographic and epidemiological approaches. In: Weinstein M, Hermalin A, Stoto M, editors. Population health and aging. New York: New York Academy of Sciences. p 140-174.
61. Parish SL. 2006. Juggling and struggling: a preliminary work-life study of mothers with adolescents with developmental disabilities. Ment Retard 44:393-404.
62. Parish SL, Lutwick ZE. 2005. A critical analysis of the emerging crisis in long-term care for people with developmental disabilities. Soc Work 50:345-354.
63. Parish SL, Saville AW. 2006. Women with cognitive limitations living in the community: evidence of disability-based disparities in health care. Ment Retard 44:249-259.
64. Parish SL, Seltzer MM, Greenberg, JS, Floyd FJ. 2004. Economic implications of caregiving at midlife: comparing parents of children with developmental disabilities to other parents. Ment Retard 42:413-426.
65. Park J, Turnbull AP, Turnbull HR. 2002. Impacts of poverty on quality of life in families of children with disabilities. Exceptional Children 68:151-170.
66. Parmet W. 2002. After September 11: rethinking public health federalism. J Law Med Ethics 30:201-211.
67. Parrott S, Schott L, Sweeney E, Baider A, Ganzglass E, Greenberg M, Minoff E, Turetski V. 2006. Implementing the TANF changes in the Deficit Reduction Act: "Win-Win" solutions for families and states. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Center for Law and Social Policy.
68. Roco MC. 2004. Science and technology integration for increased human potential and societal outcomes. Ann NY Acad Sci 1013:1-16.
69. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS. 2003. Converging technologies for improving human performance. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
70. Rodriguez R. 2003. Brown: the last discovery of America. New York: Penguin Books.
71. Seltzer M, Seltzer G. 1985. The elderly mentally retarded: a group in need of service. J Gerontol Soc Work 8:99-119.
72. Shrestha LB. 2006. The changing demographic profile of the United States. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. CRS Report for Congress, RL32701.
73. Silverstein M, Bengtson VL. 1997. Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child-parent relationships in American families. Am J Sociol 103:429-460.
74. Smeeding TM, Moynihan DP, Rainwater L. 2004. The challenge of family system changes for research and policy. In: Moynihan DP, Smeeding TM, Rainwater L, editors. The future of the family. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. p 1-21.
75. Stone RI, Wiener JM. 2001. Who will care for us? Addressing the long-term care workforce crisis. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
76. Tangredi SJ. 2000. All possible wars? Towards a consensus view of the future security environment, 2001-2005. Washington, DC: Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University.
77. Thomson RG. 1997. Extraordinary Bodies: figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
78. Turnbull HR, Beegle G, Stowe MJ. 2001. The core concepts of disability policy affecting families who have children with disabilities. J Disabil Pol Stud 12:133-143.
79. Turnbull HR, Stowe MJ, Agosta J, Turnbull AP, Schrandt MS, Muller JF. 2007. Federal family and disability policy: special relevance for developmental disabilities. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 13:114-120.
80. Turnbull HR, Stowe MJ, Schrandt MS. Public policy and developmental disabilities: a retrospective and prospective based on the core concepts of disability policy. In: Odom S, Horner R, Snell M, Blacher J, editors. Handbook of developmental disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford Publications (in press).
81. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2006. Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2006-2007 ed. Bulletin 2600. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
82. U.S. Census Bureau. 2006a. Age and sex of all people, family members and unrelated individuals iterated by income-to-poverty ratio and race: 2005. Retrieved 11/18/2006, from http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/pov/ new01_150_01.htm.
83. U.S. Census Bureau. 2006b. Nation's Population One-Third Minority. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Press release.
84. U.S. Census Bureau. 2004. The foreign-born population in the United States: Population characteristics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Current Population Reports, P20-551.
85. U.S. Department of Labor. 2002. Delivering on the promise: Self-evaluation to promote community living for people with disabilities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor. Report to the President on Executive Order 13217.
86. Walsh MW 1998. "Martin y muchos pobres": Grotesque versions of the charity of St Martin in the Bosch and Bruegel schools. Essays in Mediev Stud 14:107-120.
87. Wolbring G. 2002. Science and technology and the triple D (disease, disability, defect). In: Roco MC, Bainbridge, WS, editors. Converging technologies for improving human performance: nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation and U.S. Department of Commerce. p 232-243.
88. Wolbring G, Golledge R. 2003. Improving quality of life of disabled people using converging technologies. In: Roco MC, Bainbridge WS, editors, converging technologies for improving human performance. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic, p 270-274.
89. Wunderlich GS, Kohler PO. 2001. Improving the quality of long-term care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
90. Yamada Y. 2002. Profile of home care aides, nursing home aides, and hospital aides: historical changes and data recommendations. Gerontologist 42:199-206.