Federal family and disability policy: Special relevance for developmental disabilities

Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 114-120

  Turnbull III, H Rutherford ^a,b   Stowe, Matthew J ^a   Agosta, John ^c   Turnbull, Ann P ^a   Schrandt, M Suzanne ^a,b   Muller, John F ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b Arthritis Foundation of America   (United States)

^c Human Services Research Institute   (United States)

^d DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Developmental disability policy; Families and disability; Federal policy

Indexed keywords

ACT; DECISION MAKING; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; DISABILITY; EDUCATION; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; LAW; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MEDICAID; MEDICARE; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOCIAL SECURITY; TAX; UNITED STATES;

CHILD; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FAMILY HEALTH; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34447649396     PISSN: 10804013     EISSN: 10982779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrdd.20145     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Agosta J. 2000. Family support in the United States: past, present, and emerging systems of support. Salem, OR: Human Services Research Institute.
2. Agosta J. 2004. Family support is dead! Long live family support. TASH Connections 10:1-6.
3. Birenbaum A, Guyot D, Cohen JK. 1993. On the importance of helping families: policy implications from a national study. Ment Retard 31:67-74.
4. Braddock D, editor. 2002. Disability at the dawn of the 21st century and the state of the states. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
5. Bradley VJ, Knoll J, Agosta JM, editors. 1992. Emerging issues in family support. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
6. Consensus Statement on Family Support: Beyond Support to Control of One's Own Life (2006). Available at: www.Beachcenter.org/
7. Fujiura GT. 1998. Demography of family households. Am J Ment Retard 103:225-235.
8. Garlow JE, Turnbull HR, Schnase D. 1991. Model disability and family support ct. Kansas Law Rev 39:783-815.
9. Hastings RP, Taunt HM. 2002. Positive perceptions in families of children with developmental disabilities. Am J Ment Retard 107:116-127.
10. Hayman RL. 1990. Presumptions of justice: law, politics, and the mentally retarded parent. Harvard Law Rev 103:1202.
11. Heller T, Miller AB, Hsieh K. 1999. Impact of a consumer-directed family support program on adults with developmental disabilities and their family caregivers. Fam Relat 48:419-427.
12. Iceland J. 2000. The 'family/couple/household' unit of analysis in poverty measurement. Retrieved September 27, 2001, from http://www.census.gov/ hhes/poverty/povmeas/papers/famhh3.html#2
13. Jones TM, Garlow JE, Turnbull HR, et al. 1996. Family empowerment in a family support program. In: Singer GHS, Powers LE, Olson AL, editors. Redefining family support: innovations in public-private partnerships. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
14. Minow M. 1990. Making all the difference. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
15. Nadel M, Wamhoff S, Wiseman M. 2004. Disability, welfare reform, and supplemental security income, social security bulletin 65 (3), 14-30. Baltimore: Social Security Administration.
16. Neely-Barnes S, Marcenko M. 2004. Predicting impact of childhood disability on families: results from the 1995 National Health Interview Survey disability supplement. Ment Retard 42:284-293.
17. Parish SL. 2002. Parenting. In: Walsh PN, Heller T, editors. Health of women with intellectual disabilities. Oxford: Blackwell. p 103-120.
18. Parish SL. 2003. Federal income payments and mental retardation: the political and economic context. Ment Retard 41:446-459.
19. Parish SL, Pomeranz-Essley A, Braddock D. 2003. Family support in the United States: financing trends and emerging initiatives. Ment Retard 41:174-187.
20. Pokempner J, Roberts DE. 2001. Poverty, welfare reform, and the meaning of disability. Ohio State Law J 62:426-463.
21. Prouty RW, Smith G, Lakin KC. 2003. Residential services for persons with developmental disabilities: status and trends through 2002. Minneapolis, MN: Research and Training Center on Community Living.
22. Rizzolo M, Hemp R, Braddock D. 2006. Family support services in the United States. Policy Res Brief 17:1-12.
23. Scorgie K, Sobsey D. 2000. Transformational outcomes associated with parenting children who have disabilities. Ment Retard 38:195-206.
24. Singer GHS, Powers LE, Olson AL. 1996. Redefining family support: innovations in public-private partnerships. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.
25. Stainton T, Besser H. 1998. The positive impact of children with an intellectual disability on the family. J Intellect Dev Disabil 23:57-70.
26. Stowe MJ, Turnbull HR, Sublet C. 2006. The supreme court, "Our Town," and "disability policy": boardrooms and bedrooms, courtroom and cloakrooms. Ment Retard 44:83-99.
27. Turnbull A, Brotherson MJ, Summers JA. 1985. The impact of deinstitutionalization in families: a family systems approach. In: Bruininks RH, editor. Living and learning in the least restrictive environment. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. pp 115-152.
28. Turnbull A, Patterson JM, Behr SK, et al. 1993. Cognitive coping, families, and disability. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
29. Turnbull AP, Summers JA, Turnbull R, et al. 2007. Family supports and services in early intervention: a bold vision for "policy on the books" and "policy in the streets." J Early Inter (in press).
30. Turnbull AP, Turnbull HR, Agosta J, et al. 2005. Support of families and family life across the life-span. In: Lakin KC, Turnbull AP, editors. National goals and research for people with intellectual disabilities and developmental disabilities. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation. p 217-256.
31. Turnbull A, Turnbull HR. 2000. Families, professionals, and exceptionality, 4th ed. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
32. Turnbull A, Turnbull R, Erwin E, Soodak L. 2006. Families, professionals, and exceptionality, 5th ed. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
33. Turnbull HR, Bateman DF, Turnbull AP. 1993. Families and empowerment. In: Wehman P, editor. The aDA mandate for social change. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing. p 157-174
34. Turnbull HR, Beegle G, Stowe MJ. 2001. The core concepts of disability policy affecting families who have children with disabilities. J Disabil Policy Stud 12:133-143.
35. Turnbull HR, Garlow JE, Barber PA. 1991. A policy analysis of family support for families with members with disabilities. Kansas Law Rev 39:739-782.
36. Turnbull HR, Guess D, Turnbull A. 1988. Vox populi and Baby Doe. Ment Retard 26:127-132.
37. Turnbull HR, Stowe MJ. 2001. A taxonomy for organizing the core concepts according to their underlying principles. J Disabil Policy Stud 12:177-197.
38. Turnbull HR, Stowe MJ, Schrandt MS. (in press). Public policy and developmental disabilities: a retrospective and prospective based on the core concepts of disability policy. In: Odom S, Horner R, Snell M, Blacher J, editors. Handbook of developmental disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
39. Turnbull HR, Turnbull AP. 2000. Family support: Retrospective and prospective. In: Wehmeyer M, Patton JR, editors. Mental retardation in the 21st century. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. p 3-17.
40. US Census Bureau. 2005. Disability and american families: 2000. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration.
41. Waldfogel J. 2001. Family and medical leave: evidence from the 2000 surveys. Mon Labor Rev 124:17-23.
42. Watkins C. 1995. Beyond status: The Americans with Disabilities Act and the parental rights of people labeled developmentally disabled or mentally retarded. California Law Rev 83:1415.