Study of the Progressive Changes in Canal Shape After Using Different Instruments by Hand in Simulated S-Shaped Canals

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 986-989

  Ding ming, Huang ^a   Hong xia, Luo ^a   Cheung, Gary S P ^c   Lan, Zhang ^a   Hong, Tan ^b   Xue dong, Zhou ^a,b  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS   (China)

^b SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Hand instrument; nickel titanium; root canal shaping; S curvature

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; NICKEL; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ENDODONTICS; HISTOLOGY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH PULP;

DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; NICKEL; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM;

EID: 34447572977     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Yun H., and Kim S.K. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Radiol, and Endod 95 (2003) 228-233
2. Schäfer E., and Florek H. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 36 (2003) 199-207
3. Walia H., Brantley W.A., and Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 14 (1988) 346-357
4. Paque F., Musch U., and Hulsmann M. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J 38 (2005) 8-16
5. Guelzow A., Stamm O., Martus P., and Kielbassa A.M. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation. Int Endod J 38 (2005) 743-752
6. Yoshimine Y., Ono M., and Akamine A. The shaping effects of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals. J Endod 31 (2005) 373-375
7. Cunningham C.J., and Senia E.S. A three-dimensional study of canal curvatures in the mesial root of mandibular molars. J Endod 18 (1992) 294-300
8. Ozgur U.M., Cehreli Z.C., Mocan B.O., and Dagli F.T. Comparative evaluation of three nickel-titanium instrumentation systems in human teeth using computed tomography. J Endod 32 (2006) 668-671
9. Peters O.A., Peters C.I., Schonenberger K., and Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: assessment of torque and force in relation to canal anatomy. Int Endod J 36 (2003) 93-99
10. Veltri M., Mollo A., Pini P.P., Ghelli L.F., and Balleri P. In vitro comparison of shaping abilities of ProTaper and GT rotary files. J Endod 30 (2004) 163-166
11. Iqbal M.K., Firic S., Tulcan J., Karabucak B., and Kim S. Comparison of apical transportation between Profile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 37 (2004) 359-364
12. Calberson F.L.G., Deroose C.A.J.G., Hommez G.M.G., and De Moor R.J.G. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals. Int Endod J 37 (2004) 613-623
13. Ankrum M.T., Hartwell G.R., and Truitt J.E. K3 endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars. J Endod 30 (2004) 234-237
14. Schäfer E., Dzepina A., Dent C.M., and Danesh G. Bending properties of rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Radiol and Endod 96 (2003) 757-763
15. Blum J.Y., Machtou P., Ruddle C., and Micallef J.P. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient. J Endod 29 (2003) 567-575
16. Patiño P.V., Biedma B.M., Liébana C.R., Cantatore G., and Bahillo J.G. The influence of a manual glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments. J Endod 31 (2005) 114-116