Evidence-based practice in psychology: Perceptions of graduate students in scientist-practitioner programs

Journal of Clinical Psychology

Volumn 63, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 643-655

  Luebbe, Aaron M ^a   Radcliffe, Alison M ^b   Callands, Tamora A ^c   Green, Debbie ^d   Thorn, Beverly E ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d FORDHAM UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical psychology; Empirically supported treatment; Evidence based practice; Professional psychology training and education

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTITUDE; CAREER; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY; CURRICULUM; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; EXPOSURE; FEMALE; GRADUATE STUDENT; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PLANNING; REVIEW;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34447553655     PISSN: 00219762     EISSN: 10974679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20379     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Aarons, G. A. (2004). Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: The Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS). Mental Health Services Research, 6, 61-74.
2. Abrahamson, D. J. (1999). Outcomes, guidelines, and manuals: On leading horses to water. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 467-471.
3. Addis, M. E., Wade, W. A., & Hatgis, C. (1999). Barriers to dissemination of evidence-based practices: Addressing practitioner's concerns about manual-based psychotherapies. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 430-441.
4. American Psychological Association. (2005). Guidelines and principles for accreditation of programs in professional psychology. New York: American Psychological Association.
5. American Psychological Association, Committee on Training in Clinical Psychology (1947). Recommended graduate training program in clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 2, 539-558.
6. APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidenced-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271-285.
7. Belar, C. D., & Perry, N. W. (1992). The national conference on scientist-practitioner education and training for the professional practice of psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 71-75.
8. Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 17-19.
9. Chwalisz, K. (2003). Evidence-based practice: A framework for twenty-first-century scientist-practitioner training. The Counseling Psychologist, 31, 497-528.
10. Drabick, D.A.G., & Goldfried, M. R. (2000). Training the scientist-practitioner for the 21st century: Putting the bloom back on the rose. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 327-340.
11. Fonagy, P. (1999). Achieving evidence-based psychotherapy practice: A psychodynamic perspective on the general acceptance of treatment manuals. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 442-444.
12. Hays, K. A., Rardin, D. K., Jarvis, P. A., Taylor, N. M., Moorman, A. S., & Armstead, C. D. (2002). An exploratory survey on empirically supported treatments: Implications for internship training. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 207-211.
13. Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Jenicek, M. (2003) Foundations of evidence-based medicine. New York: Parthenon Publishing Group.
15. Kendall, P. C. (1998). Empirically supported psychological therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 3-6.
16. Milne, D., & Paxton, R. (1998). A psychological re-analysis of the scientist-practitioner model. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 5, 216-230.
17. Norcross, J. C. (1999). Collegially validated limitations of empirically validated treatments. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 472-476.
18. O'Sullivan, J. J., & Quevillon, R. P. (1992). 40 years later: Is the Boulder model still alive? American Psychologist, 47, 67-70.
19. Persons, J. B. (1995). Why practicing psychologists are slow to adopt empirically validated treatments. In S. C. Hayes, V. M. Follette, R. Risley, R. D. Dawes, & K. Grady (Eds.), Scientific standards of psychological practice: Issues and recommendations (pp. 141-157). Reno, NV: Context Press.
20. QuestionPro. (2006). Online survey software [computer software]. Seattle: Author.
21. Sox, H. C., Jr., & Woolf, S. H. (1993). Evidence-based practice guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Journal of the American Medical Association, 169, 2578.
22. Stoner, G., & Green, S. (1992). Reconsidering the scientist-practitioner model for school psychology practice. School Psychology Review, 21, 155-167.
23. Stricker, G. (2000). The scientist-practitioner model: Gandhi was right again. American Psychologist, 55, 253-254.
24. Wolfe, J. (1999). Overcoming barriers to evidence-based practice: Lessons from medical practitioners. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 445-448.
25. Woolf, S. H., & Atkins, D. A. (2001). The evolving role of prevention in health care: Contributions of the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29(Suppl. 3), 13-20.