Robotically enhanced minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: A winning strategy?

Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 333-338

  Nesher, N ^a   Bakir, I ^a   Casselman, F ^a   Degrieck, I ^a   De Greest, R ^a   Wellens, F ^a   Willaert, W ^a   Vermeulen, Y ^a   Vanermen, H ^a   Van Praet, Frank ^a  

^a OLV HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Coronary artery bypass grafting; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Robotics; Thoracotomy

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERIOGRAPHY; ARTERY ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY ANOMALY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION; EXTUBATION; FEMALE; GRAFT PATENCY; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY; KIDNEY FAILURE; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; PATIENT SAFETY; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THORACOTOMY; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; ENDOSCOPY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNAL MAMMARY-CORONARY ARTERY ANASTOMOSIS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; THORACOTOMY; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 34447539723     PISSN: 00219509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Shirai K, Lansky AJ, Mehran R, Dangas GD, Costantini CO, Fahy M et al. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting versus stenting for patients with proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2004;93:959-62.
2. Watanabe Y, Koyama N. Minimally invasive direct coronary axtery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;6:356-60.
3. Kettering K, Dapunt O, Baer FM. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2004;45:255-64.
4. Mihaljevic T, Paul S, Byrne JG, Leacche M, Farivar RS, Soltesz EG et al. Robotic mammary takedown and off-pump bypass surgery for single-vessel disease of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:1222-4.
5. Diegeler A, Walther A, Metz S, Falk V, Krakor R, Autschbach R et al. Comparison of MIDCAB versus conventional CABG surgery regarding pain and quality of life. Heart Surg Forum 1999;2:290-5.
6. Al-Ruzzeh S, Mazrani W, Wray J, Modine T, Nakamura K, George S et al. The critical outcome and quality of life following minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery. J Card Surg 2004;19:12-6.
7. Bucerius J, Metz S, Walthers T, Falk V, Doll N, Noack F et al. Endoscopic internal thoracic artery dissection leads to significant reduction of pain after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;73:1180-4.
8. Klima U, MacVaugh H 3rd, Bagaev E, Maringka M, Kirschner S, Beilner J et al. Magnetic vascular port in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation 2004;110 Suppl II:II-55-II-60.
9. Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, Banusch J, Brucerius J, Raumans J et al. Total endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:38-45.
10. Kumbhani DJ, Healey NA, Biswas KS, Birjiniuk V, Crittenden MD, Treanor PR et al. Adverse 30-day outcomes after cardiac surgery: predictive role of intraoperative myocardial acidosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:1751-7.
11. Diegeler A, Thiele H, Falk V, Hambrecht R, Spyrantis N, Sick P et al. Comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med 2002;347:561-6.
12. Calafiore AM, Angelini GD, Bergsland J, Salerno TA. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1545-8.
13. Coulson AS, Bakhshay SA. The "T-MIDCAB" procedure. Use of extension graft from the undisturbed internal mammary artery in high-risk patients. Heart Surg Forum 1998;1:549.
14. Dullum MK, Block J, Qazi A, Shawl F, Benetti E. Xyphoid MIDCAB: report of the technique and experience with less invasive MIDCAB procedure. Heart Surg Forum 1999;2:77-81.
15. Nataf P, Al-atta N, Ramadan R, Raffoul R, Salvi S, Lessana A. Thoracoscopic IMA takedown. J Card Surg 2000;15:278-82.
16. Mohr FW, Falk V, Diegeler A, Autschbach R. Computer-enhanced coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:1212-3.
17. Cisowski M, Drzewiecka-Gerber A, Ulczok R, Abu Samra R, Drzewiecka J, Guzy M, et al. Primary direct stenting versus endoscopic atraumatic coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with proximal stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery - a prospective, randomised study. Kardiol Pol 2004;61:253-61.
18. Ohkado A, Nakano K, Nakatani H, Gomi A, Sugiyama N, Saegusa N. The superiority of pulmonary function after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovsc Surg 2002;50:66-9.
19. Mehran R, Dangas G, Stamou SC, Pfister AJ, Dullum MK, Lean MB et al. One-year clinical outcome after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass. Circulation 2000;102:2799-802.
20. Hammermeister KE, Burchfiel C, Johnson R, Grover FL. Identification of patients at greatest risk for developing major complications at cardiac surgery. Circulation 1990;82 Suppl:380-9.
21. Gatti G, Cardu G, Lusa AM, Pugliese P. Predictors of postoperative complications in high-risk octogenarians undergoing cardiac operations Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:671-7.
22. Kern H, Redlich U, Hotz H, von Heymann C, Grosse J, Konertz W et al. Risk factors for prolonged ventilation after cardiac surgery using APACHE II, SAPS II, and TISS: comparison of three different models. Intensive Care Med 2001;27:407-15.
23. Bucerius J, Gummert JF, Borger MA, Walther T, Doll N, Onnasch JF et al. Stroke after cardiac surgery: a risk factor analysis of 16,184 consecutive adult patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:472-8.
24. Stephenson ER, Ducko CT, Sankholkar MS, Hoenicke EM, Prophet GA, Damiano RJ. Computer-assisted endoscopic coronary artery bypass anastomosis: a chronic animal study. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:838-43.
25. Reichenspurner H, Damiano RJ, Mack M, Boehm DH, Gulbins H, Detter C et al. Use of the voice-controlled and computer-assisted surgical system ZEUS for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:11-6.
26. Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, Löscher N, Vogel B, Ulmann C et al. Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart using a computer enhanced Telemanipulation system. Heart Surg Forum 1999;2:199-205.
27. Bonatti J, Schachner T, Bonaros N, Oehlinger A, Danzmayr M, Rutzler E et al. Ongoing procedure development in robotically assisted totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB). Heart Surg Forum 2005;8:E287-91.
28. Dogan S, Akbulut B, Aybek T, Mierdl S, Moritz AR, Wimmer-Greinecker G. Robotic coronary artery surgery: past, present and future. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2005;5:210-5.
29. Farinas JM, Carrier M, Bebert Y, Cartier R, Pellerin M, Perrault LP et al. Comparison of long-term clinical results of double versus single internal mammary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:466-70.