Magnetic vascular port in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting

Circulation

Volumn 110, Issue 11 SUPPL., 2004, Pages

  Klima, Uwe ^a   MacVaugh III, Horace ^a   Bagaev, Eric ^a   Maringka, Michael ^a   Kirschner, S ^a   Beilner, J ^a   Haverich, Axel ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automated anastomosis; Bypass; Magnetic; Minimally invasive; Revascularization

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; CLOPIDOGREL;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERIOTOMY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLIP; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DEVICE; FEMALE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WOUND INFECTION;

AGED; ASPIRIN; COMORBIDITY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; DRUG THERAPY, COMBINATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNAL MAMMARY-CORONARY ARTERY ANASTOMOSIS; MAGNETICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PLATELET AGGREGATION INHIBITORS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; THROMBOSIS; TICLOPIDINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 4644289719     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138391.77285.d9     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Nissen SE, Tsunoda T, Tuzou T, et al. Effect of Recombinant ApoA-I Milano on Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients With Acute Coronary syndromes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2003;290:2292-2300.
2. Favaloro RG. Saphenous vein graft in the surgical treatment of coronary artery disease. Operative technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 58:178-853.
3. Cameron A, Davis KB, Green GE, et al. Clinical implications of internal mammary artery bypass grafts: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study Experience. Circulation. 1988;77:815-819.
4. Weiland AP, Walker WE. Physiologic principles and clinical sequelae of cardiopulmonary bypass. Heart Lung. 1986;15:34-39.
5. Ascione RL, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, et al. Economic outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:2237-2242.
6. Plomondon ME, Cleveland JC, Ludwig ST, et al. Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Is Associated With Improved Risk-Adjusted Outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:114-119.
7. Jarvinen O. Laurikka J, Tarkka MR. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass. Comparison of patient characteristics and early outcomes. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2003;44:167-172.
8. Klima U, Falk V, Maringka M, et al. Magnetic vascular coupling for distal anastomosis in coronary artery bypass grafting: a multicenter trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:1568-1574.
9. Klima U. Maringka M, Bagaev E, et al. Total magnetic vascular coupling for arterial revascularisation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:602-603.
10. Noar JH, Evans RD. Rare Earth Magnets in Orthodontics: An Overview. Br J Orthodont. 1999;26:29-37.
11. Maniglia AJ, Ko WH, Rosenbaum M, et al. A contactless electromagnetic implantable middle ear device for sensineuronal hearing loss. Ear Nose Throat J. 1994;73:78-82. 84-8.
12. Cope C, Clark TW, Ginsberg G, et al. Stent placement of gastroenteric anastomoses formed by magnetic compression. J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 1999;10:1379-1386.
13. Takao S, Matsuo Y, Shinshi H, et al. Magnetic Compression Anastomosis for Benign Obstruction of the Common Bile Duct. Endoscopy. 2001;33:988-990.
14. Gruneberger AD, Hennig GR, Bullemer F. A magnet system for urethral closure in females. J Biomed Eng. 1984;6:102-106.
15. Shennib H, Boumzebra D, Al-Buraiki J, et al. An automated interrupted suturing device for coronary artery bypass grafting: automated coronary anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;17:312-318.
16. Gundry SR, Black K, Izutani H, et al. Sutureless coronary artery bypass with biologic glued anastomoses: Preliminary in vivo and in vitro results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:473-477.
17. Martens S, Dietrich M, Doss M, et al. The Heartflo device for distal coronary anastomoses: clinical experiences in 60 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:1139-1143.
18. Tozzi P, Solem JO, Boumzebra D, Mucciolo A, Genton CY, Chaubert P, von Segesser LK. Is the Graftconnector a valid alternative to running suture in end-to-side coronary anastomoses? Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72: S999-S1003.
19. Berdat PA, Kipfer B, Immer FF, et al. Facilitated vascular interrupted anastomosis in cardiovascular surgery with a new clip device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:783-787.
20. D'Arrigo G, Scolaro A, Lomeo A. Off-pump myocardial revascularization. The single-suture technique: how to avoid any complication. Heart Surg Forum. 2002;6:E10-E11.
21. Diegeler A, Thiele H, Falk V, et al. Comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:561-566.
22. Farinas JM, Carrier M, Hebert Y, et al. Comparison of long-term clinical results of double versus single internal mammary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67:466-470.
23. Klima U, Haverich A. Hybrid revascularization. Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery. Humana Press; Totowa, New Jersey. 2003:207-216.
24. Wittwer T, Cremer J, Boonstra P, et al. Myocardial "hybrid" revascularisation with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting combined with coronary angioplasty: preliminary results of a multicentre study. Heart. 2000;83:58-63.
25. Filsoufi F, Farivar RS, Aklog L, et al. Automated distal coronary bypass with a novel magnetic coupler. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:185-192.
26. David JL, Limet R. Antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients. Thromb Haemost. 1999;82:1417-1421.
27. Herbert JM, Dol F, Bernat A, Falotic R, Lale A, Savi P. The antiaggregating and antithrombotic activity of clopidogrel is potentiated by aspirin in several experimental models in the rabbit. Thromb Haemost. 1998;80:512-518.