Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. A systematic review

Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 255-264

  Kettering, Klaus ^a   Dapunt, O ^b   Baer, F M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b Clinic Oldenburg   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Angina pectoris; Coronary artery bypass; Coronary disease; Surgical procedures, minimally invasive

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY ANASTOMOSIS; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT PATENCY; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY; OFF PUMP SURGERY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; REOPERATION; REVIEW; STERNOTOMY; STROKE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND INFECTION; AGED; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HOSPITALIZATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORTALITY; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL; TRANSPLANTATION;

AGED; CLINICAL TRIALS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REJECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TRANSPLANTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 4043167785     PISSN: 00219509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Bertrand ME, Simoons ML, Fox KAA, Wallentin LC, Hamm CW, McFadden E et al. Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2002;23:1809-40.
2. Calafiore AM, Vitolla G, Mazzei V, Teodori G, Di Giammarco G, Ioviono T et al. The LAST operation: techniques and results before and after the stabilization era. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:998-1001.
3. Mack MJ, Magovern J, Acuff TA, Landreneau RJ, Tennison DM, Tinnerman EJ et al. Results of graft patency by immediate angiography in minimally invasive coronary artery surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:383-90.
4. Verkkala K, Voutilainen S, Jaervinen A, Keto P, Voutilainen P, Salmenperae M. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: one-year follow-up. J Card Surg 1999;14:231-7.
5. Doty JR, Fonger JD, Salazar JD, Walinsky PL, Salomon NW. Early experience with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting with the internal thoracic artery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:873-80.
6. Diegeler A, Matin M, Falk V, Binner C, Walther T, Autschbach R et al. Quality assessment in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16(Suppl 2):S67-72.
7. Nabuchi A, Kurata A, Tsukuda K, Tajima H, Kim KI. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting for the left anterior decending coronary artery. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;48: 795-801.
8. Jatene FB, Pego-Fernandes PM, Hueb AC, Marques de Oliveira P, Dallan LA, Fontes R et al. Angiographic evaluation of graft patency in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1066-9.
9. Okawa Y, Baba H, Hashimoto M, Tanaka T, Toyama M, Matsumoto K et al. Comparison of standard coronary artery bypass grafting and minimary invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;48:725-9.
10. Repossini A, Moriggia S, Cianci V, Parodi O, Sganzerla P, Baldrighi G et al. The LAST operation is safe and effective: MIDCABG clinical and angiographic evaluation. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:74-8.
11. Trehan N, Malhotra R, Mishra Y, Shrivastva S, Kohli V, Mehta Y. Comparison of ministernotomy with minithoracotomy regarding postoperative pain and internal mammary artery characteristics. Heart Surg Forum 2000:3:300-6.
12. Cremer JT, Wittwer T, Boening A, Anssar MB, Kofidis T, Muegge A et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery revascularization on the beating heart. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:1787-91.
13. Detter C, Reichenspurner H, Boehm DH, Thalhammer M, Schuetz A, Reichart B. Single vessel revascularization with beating heart techniques-minithoracotomy or sternotomy? Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 2001;19:464-70.
14. Moussa I, Oetgen M, Subramanian V, Kobayashi Y, Patel N, Moses J. Frequency of early occlusion and sterrosis in bypass grafts after minimally invasive direct coronary arterial bypass surgery. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:311-3.
15. Oliveira SA, Lisboa LA, Dallan LA, Rojas SO, Poli de Figueiredo L. Minimally invasive single-vessel coronary artery bypass with the internal thoracic artery and early postoperative angiography: midterm results of a prospective study in 120 consecutive patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:505-10.
16. Cisowski M, Samra RA, Kruczak W, Morawski W, Bochenek A. Video-assisted minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: the early and late results. Heart Surg Forum 2002;5 Suppl 4:S 317-30.
17. Stanbridge RDL, Hadjinikolaou LK. Technical adjuncts in beating heart surgery: comparison of MIDCAB to off-pump sternotomy: a meta analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16 Suppl 2:S24-33.
18. Detter C, Reichenspurner H, Boehm D, Thalhammer M, Raptis P, Schütz A et al. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB): 2 techniques for beating heart surgery. Heart Surg Forum 2002;5:157-62.
19. Cremer J, Mügge A, Wittwer T, Boening A, Kim P, Kofidis T et al. Early angiographic results after revasculariziation by minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:383-8.
20. Calafiore AM, Teodori G, Di Giammarco G, Vitolla G, Contini M. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery: the last operation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;9:305-11.
21. Mariani MA, Boonstra PW, Grandjean JG, van der Schans C, Dusseljee S, van Weert E. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;11:881-7.
22. Possati G, Gaudino M, Alessandrini F, Zimarino M, Glieca F, Luciani N. Systematic clinical and angiographic follow-up of patients undergoing minimally invasive coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998:115:785-90.
23. Subramanian VA. Less invasive arterial CABG on a beating heart. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63 Suppl 6:S68-71.
24. Mack MJ, Osborne JA, Shennib H. Arterial graft patency in coronary artery bypass grafting: what do we really know? Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1055-9.
25. Berger PE, Aldermann EL, Nadel A, Schaff HV. Frequency of early occlusion and stenosis in a left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery bypass graft after surgery through a median sternotomy on conventional bypass. Circulation 1999;100: 2353-8.
26. Fitz-Gibbon GM, Burton JR, Leach AJ. Coronary bypass graft fate. Angiographic grading of 1400 consecutive grafts early after operation and of 1 132 after 1 year. Circulation 1978;57:1070-4.
27. Morin JF, Tsang J, Constance C. Reversible anastomotic stenosis after minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Can J Surg 2001;44:59-60.
28. Mehran R, Subramanian V, Mack M, Pfister A, Corso P, Gill IS et al. Angiographic patency of LIMA-LAD anastomosis after MIDCAB compared to conventional CABG: Results from the POEM trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37 (2 Suppl A):12a.
29. Diegeler A, Spyrantis N, Matin M, Falk V, Hambrecht R, Autschbach R et al. The revival of surgical treatment for isolated high grade LAD lesions by minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:501-4.
30. Thiele H, Diegeler A, Lauer B, Hambrecht R, Mohr FW, Schuler G. Minimal invasive bypass surgery versus stentimplantation in isolated proximal high lesions of the LAD in more than 200 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37 (2 Suppl A);370a.
31. Diegeler A, Thiele H, Falk V, Hambrecht R, Spyrantis N, Sick P et al. Comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med 2002;347:561-6.
32. Cisowski M, Drzewiecki J, Drzewiecka-Gerber A, Jaklik A, Kruczak W, Szczeklik M et al. Primary stenting versus MIDCAB: preliminary report-comparison of two methods of revascularization in single left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:S1334-9.
33. Cisowski M, Drzewiecki J, Jaklik A, Drzewiecka-Gerber A, Kruczak W, Bochenek A. Primary stenting versus atraumatic coronary artery bypass. Comparison of 2 methods of revascularization in single lad stenosis. One year follow-up. Heart Surg Forum 2003; 6 Suppl 1:S26.
34. Drenth D, Winter J, Veeger N, Monnink S, Boven A, Grandjean J et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stenting in isolated high-grade stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery: 6 months' angiographic and clinical follow-up of a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:130-5.
35. Iakovou I, Dangas G, Mehran R, Lansky A, Stamou S, Pfister A et al. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) versus coronary artery stenting for elective revascularization of the left anterior decending artery. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:885-7.
36. Boodhwani M, Rubens FD, Ruel M, Mesana T. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus minimally invasive coronary artery bypass for the treatment of isolated proximal left anterior descending artery disease. Heart Surg Forum 2003;6 Suppl 1:S27.