A new method to evaluate patient characteristic response to ultrafiltration during hemodialysis

International Journal of Artificial Organs

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 377-384

  Casagrande, Giustina ^a   Teatini, U ^b   Longhena, G Romei ^b   Miglietta, F ^a   Fumero, R ^a   Costantino, M L ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b Ospedale Caduti Bollatesi   (Italy)

Author keywords

Blood volume monitoring; Hemodialysis; Monitoring; Plasma refiling; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; HEMODIALYZERS; HEMODYNAMICS; PATIENT TREATMENT; ULTRAFILTRATION;

BLOOD COMPOSITION; BLOOD VOLUME MONITORING; BLOOD VOLUMES; DIALYSIS THERAPY; FLUID EXCHANGE; HAEMODIALYSIS; PLASMA REFILING; PLASMA REFILLING; VOLUME VARIATION; WEIGHT LOSS;

DIALYSIS;

ELECTROLYTE; GLUCOSE; UREA;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; BLOOD VOLUME; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; ELECTROLYTE BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEART RATE; HEMATOCRIT; HEMODIALYSIS; HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT; HUMAN; MAINTENANCE THERAPY; MALE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; ONLINE ANALYSIS; PATIENT MONITORING; PROTEIN CONTENT; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TREATMENT RESPONSE; ULTRAFILTRATION; UREA BLOOD LEVEL; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

EID: 34447536742     PISSN: 03913988     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/039139880703000504     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Donauer J, Kolblin D, Bek M, Krause A, Bohler J. Ultrafiltration profiling and measurement of relative blood volume as strategies to reduce hemodialysis-related side effects. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36: 115-23.
2. Van der Sande FM, Kooman JP, Leunissen KM. Intradialytic hypotension-new concepts on an old problem. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15: 1746-8.
3. Santoro A, Mancini E. Clinical significance of intradialytic blood volume monitoring. Int J Artif Organs 1997; 20: 1-6.
4. Locatelli F, Buoncristiani U, Canaud B, Kohler H, Petitclerc T, Zucchelli P. Haemodialysis with on-line monitoring equipment: tools or toys? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 20: 22-3.
5. Di Filippo S, Manzoni C, Locatelli F. Kt/V or solute removal index: problems in measuring and interpreting the results. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13: 2199-202.
6. Teruel JL, Fernandez Lucas M, Marcen R, Rodriguez JR, Rivera M, Liano F, Ortuno J. Estimate of the dialysis dose using ionic dialysance. Nefrologia 2001; 21: 78-83.
7. Colton CK, Lowrie EG. Hemodialysis: physical principles and technical considerations. In: Brenner BM, Rector FC, eds. The Kidney, 2nd ed., Vol.2. New York: Saunders, 1981. p 2425-89.
8. Santoro A, Mancini E, Paolini F, Zucchelli P., Blood volume monitoring and control. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996; 11 (Suppl 2): 42-7.
9. Mendenhall W, Sincich T. Statistics for Engineering and The Sciences, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall International; 1995.
10. Mitra S, Chamney P, Greenwood R, Farrington K. Serial determinations of absolute plasma volume with indocyanine green during hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 2345-51.
11. Plum J, Schoenicke G, Kleophas W, Kulas W, Steffens F, Azem A, Grabensee B. Comparison of body fluid distribution between chronic haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients as assessed by biophysical and biochemical methods. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16: 2378-85.
12. Jankowska M, Debska-Slizien A, Rutkowsky B. Bioelectrical impedance analysis before versus after hemodialysis session in evaluation of nutritional status. J Ren Nutr 2006; 16: 137-40.
13. Kuhlmann MK, Zhu F, Seibert E, Levin NW. Bioimpedance, dry weight arid blood pressure control: new methods and consequences. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18: 647-50.
14. Talluri A. Akern/RJL Systems R&D, Qualitative analysis of body composition. Akern Firenze, Florence, 1998.