As if Kyoto mattered: The clean development mechanism and transportation

Energy Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 5136-5150

  Christopher Zegras, P ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clean development mechanism; Greenhouse gases; Transportation

Indexed keywords

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; EMISSION REDUCTION;

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ENERGY UTILIZATION; GREENHOUSE GASES; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ENERGY POLICY;

ANTHROPOGENIC SOURCE; CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; DEVELOPING WORLD; EMISSION CONTROL; GREENHOUSE GAS; KYOTO PROTOCOL; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TRAVEL DEMAND;

ATLANTIC ISLANDS; ATLANTIC OCEAN; CARIBBEAN ISLANDS; DOMINICAN REPUBLIC; GREATER ANTILLES; SANTIAGO RODRIGUEZ;

EID: 34447517031     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.04.032     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ampt E.S., and de Ortúzar J.D. On best practices in continuous large-scale mobility surveys. Transport Reviews 24 3 (2004) 337-363
2. Aunan K., Fang J., Vennemo H., Oye K., and Seip H. Co-benefits of climate policy-lessons learned from a study in Shanxi, China. Energy Policy 32 (2004) 567-581
3. Boyce D., and Bar-Gera H. Multiclass combined models for urban travel forecasting. Networks and Spatial Economics 4 (2004) 115-124
4. Browne J., Sanhueza E., Silsbe E., Winkelman S., and Zegras C. Getting on Track: Finding a Path for Transportation and the CDM (2005), International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Manitoba. http://www.iisd.org/publications/pub.aspx?id=690 〈http://www.iisd.org/publications/pub.aspx?id=690〉
5. Cameron I., Kenworthy J.R., and Lyons T.J. Understanding and predicting private motorised mobility. Transportation Research Part D 8 (2003) 267-283
6. CDM Executive Board (CDM EB), 2005. Tool for the Demonstration and Assessment of Additionality (Version 2). 28 November. 〈http://cdm.unfccc.int/〉.
7. Chandler, K., Walkowicz, K., 2006. King County Metro transit hybrid articulated buses: final evaluation results. Technical Report NREL/TP-540-40585, National Renewable Energy Laboratory,Golden, CO, December. 〈http://www.nrel.gov/vehiclesandfuels/fleettest/pdfs/40585.pdf〉.
8. de Almeida D'Agosto M., and Kahn Ribeiro S. Performance evaluation of hybrid-drive buses and potential fuel savings in Brazilian urban transit. Transportation 31 (2004) 479-496
9. Delucchi, M., 2003. A lifecycle emissions model (LEM): lifecycle emissions from transportation fuels, motor vehicles, transportation modes, electricity use, heating and cooking fuels, and materials. Paper UCD-ITS-RR-03-17, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California-Davis, December. 〈http://repositories.cdlib.org/itsdavis/UCD-ITS-RR-03-17/〉.
10. DICTUC, 2004. Gases de Efecto Invernadero (GEI) para el caso de Chile (actualización). Proyecto GEF/PNUD CHI/96/G31. Prepared for the Comisión Nacional del Medio Ambiente (CONAMA) by DICTUC, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, April. 〈http://www.conama.cl/coain/articles-32461_recurso_1.pdf〉.
11. Donoso, P., Martínez, F., Zegras, C., 2006. The Kyoto Protocol and sustainable cities: the potential use of the clean development mechanism in structuring cities for "carbon-efficient" transport. Transportation Research Record No. 1983, pp.158-166.
12. Ellis, J., 2006. Issues Related to Implementing "Programmatic CDM". Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. 〈http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/42/31/36278652.pdf〉.
13. Ellis J., Winkler H., Corfee-Morlot J., and Gagnon-Lebrun F. CDM: taking stock and looking forward. Energy Policy 35 (2007) 15-28
14. Farrell A., Plevin R., Turner B., Jones A., O'Hare M., and Kammen D. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311 (2006) 506-508
15. Fenhann, J., 2006. CDM pipeline overview. Updated 20 October 2006, UNEP Risø Centre, Roskild, Denmark: last accessed 19 November 2006 at: 〈http://www.uneprisoe.org/〉.
16. Graftieaux, P., Vergara, W., Johnson, T., 2003. Global environment facility support for sustainable transport: early lessons from World Bank-assisted projects in Mexico City, Mexico; Santiago, Chile; and Lima Peru. Transportation Research Record No. 1846. Transportation in Developing Countries, pp. 9-13.
17. Heywood, J., Weiss, M., Schäfer, A., Bassene, S., Natarajan, V., 2003. The Performance of Future ICE and Fuel Cell Powered Vehicles and Their Potential Fleet Impact. Publication No. LFEE 2003-004 RP, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory for Energy and the Environment, Cambridge, MA, December. 〈http://lfee.mit.edu/public/LFEE_2003-004_RP.pdf〉.
18. International Energy Agency (IEA), 2004. The IEA/SMP Transport Spreadsheet Model, developed for the World Business Council for Sustainable Development Sustainable Mobility Project. Model and documentation last accessed 6 November 2006 at: 〈http://wbcsd.org/plugins/DocSearch/details.asp?type=DocDet&ObjectId=MTE0Njc〉.
19. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1997. 〈http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.html〉.
20. Martínez F., and Donoso P. Modeling land use planning effects: zone regulations and subsidies. In: Hensher D. (Ed). Travel Behaviour Research, the Leading Edge (2001), Pergamon-Elsevier 647-658
21. Metro. Statistical Appendix 2001 (2002), Metro de Santiago, Santiago
22. Ministerio de Obras Públicas (MOP). Estudio de Impacto Ambiental del Sistema Oriente-Poniente (1997), Unidad Ejecutiva de Concesiones Urbanas, Santiago
23. Moreira J.R., and Goldemberg J. The alcohol program. Energy Policy 27 (1999) 229-245
24. O'Ryan, R., Sperling, D., Delucchi, M., Turrentine, T., 2002. Transportation in Developing Countries: Greenhouse Gas Scenarios for Chile. Prepared for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, August. 〈www.pewclimate.org/global-warming-in-depth/all_reports/chile_transportation_report/index.cfm〉.
25. de Ortúzar J.D., Iacobelli A., and Valeze C. Estimating the demand for a cycle-way network. Transportation Research Part A 34 (2000) 353-373
26. Pargal S., and Heil M. Reducing air pollution from urban passenger transport: a framework for policy analysis. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43 5 (2000) 667-668
27. Price L., de la Rue du Can S., Sinton J., Worrell E., Nan Z., Sathaye J., and Levine M. Sectoral trends in global energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. LBNL-56144 (2006), Ernest Orlando Berkeley National Laboratory, Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Berkeley, CA. http://ies.lbl.gov/iespubs/56144.pdf July. 〈http://ies.lbl.gov/iespubs/56144.pdf〉
28. Rajamani J., Bhat C., Handy S., Knaap G., and Song Y. Assessing impact of urban form measures on nonwork trip mode choice after controlling for demographic and level-of-service effects. Transportation Research Record 1831 (2003) 158-165
29. Schäfer, A., 2000. Regularities in travel demand: an international perspective. Journal of Transportation and Statistics December, 1-31.
30. Schäfer A., Heywood J., and Weiss M. Future fuel cell and internal combustion engine automobile technologies: a 25-year life cycle and fleet impact assessment. Energy 31 12 (2006) 2064-2087
31. Schipper L., Marie-Lilliu M., and Gorham R. Flexing the Link between Transport Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Path for the World Bank (2000), International Energy Agency, Paris. http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2000/flex2000.pdf June. 〈http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2000/flex2000.pdf〉
32. Schmidt J., Helme N., Lee N., and Houdashelt M. Sector-based Approach to the Post-2012 Climate Change Policy Architecture (2006), Center for Clean Air Policy, Washington, DC. http://www.ccap.org/international/Sector%20Straw%20Proposal%20-%20FINAL%20for%20FAD%20Working%20Paper%20%7E%208%2025%2006.pdf August. 〈http://www.ccap.org/international/Sector%20Straw%20Proposal%20-%20FINAL%20for%20FAD%20Working%20Paper%20%7E%208%2025%2006.pdf 〉
33. Schmidt J., Silsbe E., Lee J., Winkelmna S., Helme N., and Garibaldi J. "Program of Activities" as CDM Projects: Implications of the Montreal Decision (2006), Center for Clean Air Policy, Washington, DC May
34. SECTRA. Encuesta Origen Destino de Viajes del Gran Santiago 1991 (1992), Comisión de Planificación de Inversiones en Infraestructura de Transporte, Santiago
35. SECTRA, 1992b. Greater Santiago Origin-Destination Survey. Provided to the author by SECTRA in 2001.
36. SECTRA, 2002. Greater Santiago Origin-Destination Survey. Provided to the author by SECTRA in 2004.
37. SECTRA, 2004. Mobility Survey 2001: Executive Report. Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile and Gobierno de Chile, Santiago. 〈http://www.sectra.cl/contenido/bases_datos_sig/encuestas_movilidad/encuestas_grastgo.htm〉.
38. Sterk, W., Wittneben, B., 2005. Addressing opportunities and challenges of a sectoral approach to the clean development mechanism. JIKO Policy Paper 1/2005, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, August. 〈http://www.wupperinst.org/download/JIKO-PP_2005-1.pdf〉.
39. United Nations (UN), 2001. World Urbanization Prospects. United Nations Population Division. 〈http://esa.un.org/unpp/〉.
40. UNCTAD. An implementation guide to the clean development mechanism (2003), United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva. http://www.unctad.org/en/docs//ditcted20031_en.pdf 〈http://www.unctad.org/en/docs//ditcted20031_en.pdf〉
41. UNEP, undated. Introduction to the CDM. UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment, Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark. 〈http://www.uneprisoe.org/CDMCapacityDev/CDMintro.pdf〉.
42. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2005. Decision -1/CMP.1, Further guidance relating to the clean development mechanism. Advance unedited version. 〈http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_11/application/pdf/cmp1_24_4_further_guidance_to_the_cdm_eb_cmp_4.pdf〉.
43. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2006a. CDM: Project Activities, Registered. Database, last accessed on 7 November 2006 at: 〈http://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/registered.html〉.
44. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2006b. Not Approved Methodologies. Database: 〈http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/PAmethodologies/publicview.html?OpenAll=1&cases=C〉.
45. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 2006. Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2004. Office of Atmospheric Programs: 〈http://yosemite.epa.gov/oar/globalwarming.nsf/content/ResourceCenterPublicationsGHGEmissionsUSEmissionsInventory2006.html〉.
46. Universidad de Chile, 2002. Actualización del Modelo de Cálculo de Emisiones Vehiculares, Informe Final. Prepared for the Ministry of Planning and Cooperations, Santiago, January. 〈http://www.sectra.cl/contenido/metodologia/transporte_medioambiente/estimacion_emisiones_fuentes_moviles_modem.asp#〉.
47. World Bank, 2006. World Development Indicators. 〈http://devdata.worldbank.org/data-query/〉.
48. Wright L., and Fulton L. Climate change mitigation and transport in developing nations. Transport Reviews 25 6 (2005) 691-717
49. Zegras C. The costs of transportation in Santiago de Chile: analysis and policy implications. Transport Policy 5 (1998) 9-21
50. Zegras, C., Gakenheimer, R., 2000. Urban growth management for mobility: the case of the Santiago, Chile Metropolitan Region. Working Paper for the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy and the MIT Cooperative Mobility Program, Cambridge. 〈http://web.mit.edu/czegras/www/Zegras_Gakenheimer_Stgo_growth_mgmt.pdf〉.
51. Zhang M. The role of land use in travel mode choice: evidence from Boston and Hong Kong. Journal of the American Planning Association 70 3 (2004) 344-360