Future fuel cell and internal combustion engine automobile technologies: A 25-year life cycle and fleet impact assessment

Energy

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1728-1751

  Schäfer, Andreas ^a   Heywood, John B ^b   Weiss, Malcolm A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fuel cell vehicle; Greenhouse gas emusions; Life cycle assessment; Transportation; Vehicle technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745825901     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2005.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Reuters. Daimler-Benz fuels alternative energy hopes. C-reuters@clari.net, September 22, 1997.
2. D.L. Greene, and J. DeCicco Engineering-economic analyses of automotive fuel economy potential in the United States Annu Rev Energy Environ 25 2000 477 535.
3. Weiss MA, Heywood JB, Drake EM, Schäfer A, AuYeung F. On the road in 2020: a well-to-wheels assessment on new passenger car technologies. Report no. EL 00-003, MIT Energy Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
4. Weiss MA, Heywood JB, Schäfer A, Natarajan VK. Comparative assessment of fuel cell cars. Report no. 2003-001 RP, MIT Laboratory for Energy and the Environment, Cambridge, MA, 2003.
5. Thomas CE, James BD, Lomax FD, Kuhn IF. Societal impacts of fuel options for fuel cell vehicles. SAE technical paper series 982496, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale, PA, 1998.
6. Höhlein B, Nitsch J, Wagner U, Biedermann P, Menzer R, Grube Th, et al. Holistic systems study on the fuel transformation by fuel cells (Ganzheitliche Systemuntersuchung zur Energiewandlung durch Brennstoffzellen). Report no. 686, Forschungvereinigung Verbrennungskraftmaschinen e.V., Frankfurt am Main, 1998 [in German].
7. General Motors Corporation, Argonne National Laboratories, BP, ExxonMobil, Shell. Well-to-wheel energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/vehicle systems - North American analysis, 2001. See also: http://www.transportation.anl.gov/pdfs/TA/163.pdf.
8. General Motors Corporation, L-B Systemtechnik GmbH, BP, ExxonMobil, TotalFinaElf, GM. Well-to-wheel analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/vehicle systems - a European study. Ottobrunn, Germany: L-B-Systemtechnik GmbH, 2002. See also: http://www.lbst.de/gm-wtw.
9. J.M. Ogden, R.H. Williams, and E.D. Larson Societal lifecycle costs of cars with alternative fuels/engines Energy Policy 32 1 2004 7 27.
10. Wang M, Huang HS. A full fuel-cycle analysis of energy and emissions impacts of transportation fuels produced from natural gas. Report no. ANL/ESD-40, Argonne National Laboratory Center for Transportation Research, Argonne, IL, 1999. See also: http://www.cleanairnet.org/infopool/1411/articles- 35661_fullfuel_cycle.pdf.
11. Energy Information Administration Emissions of greenhouse gases in the United States 1996 1997 US Department of Energy Washington, DC.
12. Ogden JM, Kreutz DG, Steinbugler M. Fuels for fuel cell vehicles: vehicle design and infrastructure issues. Report no. 982500, Presented at society of automotive engineers fuels and lubricants meeting and exposition, San Francisco, CA, 1998.
13. Thomas CE, James BD, Lomax FD, Kuhn IF. Fuel options for the fuel cell vehicles: hydrogen, methanol, or gasoline? Presented at the fuel cell reformer conference, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, CA, 1998.
14. Carsten S, Teagan P, Stobart R. Fuels for fuel cell powered vehicles. SAE-paper 2000-01-0003, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale, PA, 2000.
15. US Energy Information Administration. Annual energy outlook. Report no. DOE/EIA-0383, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 2005. See also: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/pdf/0383(2005).pdf.
16. 2 emissions in the EU refining sector. Final report (revised) to Ford Motor Company, MathPro Inc., West Bethesda, ML, 2000.
17. L. Guzzella, and A. Amstutz Quasi-stationary simulations, Matlab program and user manual (Quasi-Stationäre Simulationen, Matlab Programm und Benutzeranleitung) 1998 Laboratorium für Motorsysteme, Institut für Energietechnik ETH Zürich [in German].
18. Chon D, Heywood JB. Performance scaling of spark-ignition engines: correlation and historical analysis of production engine data. SAE-paper 2000-01-0565, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale, PA, 2000.
19. Ballard Power Systems. Ballard fuel cell power module, Mark 900 Series, Mk 900 polarization. Burnaby, BC: Ballard Power Systems; 2001.
20. US Department of Energy. Cost analysis of fuel cell system for transportation, 2001 system cost estimate. Task 3 Report to the US Department of Energy, Arthur D. Little, Inc., SFAA no. DE-SCO2-98EE50526, Cambridge, MA, 2001.
21. DeCicco JM. Fuel cell vehicles: technology, market, and policy issues. SAE research report RR-010, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 2001.
22. Anderman M, Kalhammer FR, MacArthur D. Advanced batteries for electric vehicles: an assessment of performance, cost, and availability. Draft manuscript prepared for State of California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA, 2000.
23. M. Duvall, D. Taylor, M. Wehrey, N. Pinsky, W. Warf, and F. Kahlhammer Advanced batteries for electric vehicles, a technology and cost-effectiveness assessment for battery electric, power assist hybrid electric, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles 2003 Electric Power Research Institute Palo Alto, CA.
24. Automotive Engineering. Life cycle analysis: getting the total picture on vehicle engineering alternatives, March 1996. p. 49-52.
25. Röder A. Life-cycle inventory of different car powertrains. Final Report, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen Switzerland, 2000.
26. DaimlerChrysler. Environmental report - facts and figures, no date.
27. US Department of Commerce and US Department of Transportation 1997 commodity flow survey 1999 Bureau of Transportation Statistics and US Census Bureau Wahsington, DC See also: http://www.bts.gov/ntda/cfs/prod.html.
28. S.W. Davis, and S.W. Diegel Transportation energy data book 23rd ed 2003 Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Center for Transportation Analysis Oak Ridge, TN.
29. US Department of Transportation Vehicle inventory and use survey (VIUS) 2002 Bureau of Transportation Statistics Washington, DC.
30. Automotive Engineering. Progress in recycling specific materials from automobiles, August 1997. p. 51-3.
31. D.L. Greene, P.D. Patterson, M. Singh, and J. Li Feebates, rebates and gas-guzzler taxes: a study of incentives for increased fuel economy Energy Policy 33 6 2005 757 775.
32. N. Nakicenovic The automobile road to technological change: diffusion of the automobile as a process of technological substitution Technol Forecasting Social Change 29 4 1986 309 340.
33. US Census Bureau. Statistical abstract of the United States, 122nd ed. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2002.
34. Wards Communications Inc., Various years, Wards automotive yearbook. Southfield, MI: Wards Communications Inc.
35. Hellman KH, Heavenrich, RM. Light-duty automotive technology and fuel economy trends: 1975 through 2003. Report no. EPA420-R-03-006, US Environmental Protection Agency, Advanced Technology Division, Washington, DC, 2003.
36. US Department of Transportation. Highway statistics. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Highway Policy Information, Washington, DC, various years.
37. International Energy Agency Automotive fuels for the future: the search for alternatives 1999 IEA/OECD Paris.
38. S. Joshi, L. Lave, H. MacLean, and R. Lankey A lifecycle comparison of alternative transportation fuels. Proceedings of the SAE total life cycle conference 2000 Society of Automotive Engineers Detroit, MI.
39. Ford Motor Company. Integrated fuel cell analysis model (IFCAM). User instructions for version 3.1 (filename IFCAMV31.xls). Report to Ford Motor Company, Arthur D. Little, Inc., Cambridge, MA, 1996.
40. J.M. Ogden, M. Steinbugler, and D.G. Kreutz A comparison of hydrogen, methanol and gasoline as fuels for fuel cell vehicles: implications for vehicle design and infrastructure development J Power Sources 79 1999 143 168.
41. Heywood JB, Weiss MA, Schäfer A, Bassene SA, Natarajan VK. The performance of future ice and fuel cell powered vehicles and their potential fleet impact. SAE paper 2004-01-1011, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 2004.