Effects of colon cancer risk counseling for first-degree relatives

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1485-1491

  Glanz, Karen ^a   Steffen, Alana D ^b   Taglialatela, Lauren A ^a,c  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CHILD; COLON CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUNSELING; CULTURAL SENSITIVITY; FAMILY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELATIVE; SIBLING; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ASIAN AMERICANS; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FAMILY; FEMALE; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC SCREENING; HAWAII; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; JAPAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 34447513885     PISSN: 10559965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0914     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group [homepage on the Internet]. United States cancer statistics: 1999-2002 incidence and mortality. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Cancer Institute; 2006 [cited 2006 Aug 6]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/uscs/index. htm.
2. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2006.
3. Johns LE, Houlston RS. A systematic review and meta-analysis of familial cancer risk. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:2992-3003.
4. Butterworth AS, Higgins JPT, Pharoah P. Relative and absolute risk of colorectal cancer for individuals with a family history: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:216-27.
5. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale - update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003;124:544-60.
6. Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:132-41.
7. Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW. Patterns of colorectal screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:389-94.
8. Seeff LC, King J, Pollack LA, Williams KN. Increased use of colorectal cancer tests - United States, 2002 and 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006;55:3008-311.
9. National Guideline Clearinghouse [homepage on the Internet]. Guideline synthesis: screening for colorectal cancer. Rockville (MD); 2002 [cited 2002 Aug 12]. Available from: http://www.guideline.gov/Compare/comparison.aspx?file= CRCSCREEN9.inc.
10. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, von Eschenbach AC, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:8-22.
11. Longacre AV, Cramer LD, Gross CP. Screening colonoscopy use among individuals at higher colorectal cancer risk. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006;40:490-6.
12. Ramji F, Cotterchio M, Manno M, Rabeneck L, Gallinger S. Association between subject factors and colorectal cancer screening participation in Ontario, Canada. Cancer Detect Prev 2005;29:221-6.
13. Tyagi A, Morris J. Using decision analytic methods to assess the utility of family history tools. Am J Prev Med 2003;24:199-207.
14. Ramsey SD, Burke W, Pinsky L, Clarke L, Newcomb P, Khoury MJ. Family history assessment to detect increased risk for colorectal cancer: conceptual considerations and a preliminary economic analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:2494-500.
15. U.S. Surgeon General's Family History Initiative [homepage on the Internet]. [cited 2006 Aug 26]. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ famillyhistory/.
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [homepage on the Internet]. CDC's family history web site for the public. [cited 2006 Aug 26]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/genomics/public/famhist.htm.
17. Weinstein ND. The precaution adoption process. Health Psychol 1988;7:355-86.
18. Weinstein ND. Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior. Psychol Bull 1989;12:324-33.
19. Manne S, Markowitz A, Winawer S, et al. Understanding intention to undergo colonoscopy among intermediate-risk siblings of colorectal cancer patients: a test of a mediational model. Prev Med 2003;36:71-84.
20. Emmons KM, Wong M, Puleo E, Weinstein N, Fletcher R, Colditz G. Tailored computer-based risk communication: correcting colorectal cancer risk perception. J Health Commun 2004;9:127-41.
21. Weinstein ND, Atwood K, Puleo E, Fletcher R, Colditz G, Emmons KM. Colon cancer: risk perception and risk communication. J Health Commun 2004;9:53-65.
22. Lipkus IM, Skinner CS, Green LSG, Dement J, Samsa GP, Ransohoff D. Modifying attributions of colorectal cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:560-6.
23. Lipkus IM, Skinner CS, Dement J, et al. Increasing colorectal cancer screening among individuals in the carpentry trade: test of risk communication interventions. Prev Med 2005;40:489-501.
24. Hull SC, Glanz K, Steffen A, Wilfond B. Recruitment approaches for family studies: attitudes of index patients and their relatives. IRB 2004;26:12-8.
25. Marcus AC, Mason M, Wolfe P, et al. The efficacy of tailored print materials in promoting colorectal cancer screening: results from a randomized trial involving callers to the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service. J Health Commun 2005;10 Suppl 1:83-104.
26. Marcus AC, Ahnen D, Cutter G, et al. Promoting cancer screening among first-degree relatives of breast and colorectal cancer patients: the design of two randomized trials. Prev Med 1999;28:229-42.
27. Vernon SW. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:1406-22.
28. Vernon SW, Myers R, Tilley BC. Development and validation of an instrument to measure factors related to colorectal cancer adherence. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomarkers 1997;6:825-32.
29. Lerman C, Lustbader E, Rimer R, et al. Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:286-92.
30. Evans DG, Blair V, Greenhalgh R, Hopwood P, Howell A. The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1994;70:934-8.
31. Curry SJ, Taplin SH, Anderman C, Barlow WE, McBride C. A randomized trial of the impact of risk assessment and feedback on participation in mammography screening. Prev Med 1993;22:350-60.
32. Kreuter MW, Farrell D, Olevitch L, Brennan L. Tailoring health messages. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.
33. Skinner CS, Campbell MK, Rimer BK, Curry SJ, Prochaska JO. Howeffec tive is tailored print communication? Ann Behav Med 1998;21:290-8.
34. Guide to Community Preventive Services [homepage on the Internet]. Promoting colorectal cancer screening in communities. [cited 2006 Aug 6]. Available from: http://thecommunityguide.org/cancer/screening/default.htm.
35. Weinstein ND, Sandman PM. The precaution adoption process model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.; 2002. p. 121-43.
36. Lazarus RS. Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.
37. Glanz K, Grove J, Le Marchand L, Gotay C. Underreporting of family history of colon cancer: correlates and implications. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:635-9.
38. Croyle RT, Lerman C. Interest in genetic testing for colon cancer susceptibility: cognitive and emotional correlates. Prev Med 1993;22:284-92.
39. Glanz K, Patterson R, Kristal A, et al. Impact of worksite health promotion on stages of dietary change: The Working Well Trial. Health Educ Behav 1998;25:448-63.
40. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [homepage on the Internet]. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system: questionnaires. [cited 2006 Aug 26]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/questionnaires/questionnaires.htm.
41. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986;73:13-22.
42. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;51:1173-82.
43. MacKinnon DP, Taborga MP, Morgan-Lopez AA. Mediation designs for tobacco prevention research. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002;68:S69-83.