Corrigendum to "An earthquake scenario for the microzonation of Sofia and the vulnerability of structures designed by use of the Eurocodes". [Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27 (2007) 1028-1041] (DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.03.004);An earthquake scenario for the microzonation of Sofia and the vulnerability of structures designed by use of the Eurocodes

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1028-1041

  Paskaleva, I ^a   Dimova, S ^b   Panza, G F ^c,d   Vaccari, F ^c,d  

^a BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Bulgaria)

^b European Laboratory for Structural Assessment (ELSA)   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

^d ABDUS SALAM INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Italy)

Author keywords

Damage estimations; Ground motion modelling; Hybrid approach; Seismic hazard; Vulnerability

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEISMIC WAVES; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

DAMAGE ESTIMATIONS; DAMAGE INDEX; GROUND MOTION MODELLING; SEISMIC HAZARD;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

BUILDING CODE; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC HAZARD; STRONG MOTION; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; ZONATION;

BULGARIA; EURASIA; EUROPE; SOFIA; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

EID: 34447504450     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.08.003     Document Type: Erratum

References (66)

1. Fäh D., Iodice C., Suhadolc P., and Panza G.F. A new method for the realistic estimation of seismic ground motion in megacities: the case of Rome. Earthquake Spectra 9 (1993) 643-668
2. Fäh D, Iodice C, Suhadolc P, Panza GF. Application of numerical simulations for a tentative seismic microzonation of the city of Rome, Annali di geofisica, vol. XXXVIII (5-6), Nov. Dec 1995. p. 607-15.
3. Fäh D., Suhadolc P., Mueller St., and Panza G.F. A hybrid method for the estimation of ground motion in sedimentary basins; quantitative modelling for Mexico city. BSSA 84 (1995) 383-399
4. Panza G.F. Synthetic seismograms: the Rayleigh waves model summation. J Geophys 58 (1985) 125-145
5. Panza G.F., and Suhadolc P. Complete strong motion synthetics, in seismic strong motion synthetics. In: Bolt B.A. (Ed). Computational techniques vol. 4 (1987), Academic Press, Orlando 153-204
6. Panza G.F., and Vaccari F. Introduction in seismic hazard of the Circum-pannonian region. In: Panza G.F., Radulian M., and Trifu C. (Eds). PAGEOPH topical volumes (2000), Birkhauser, Basel 5-10
7. Virieux J. SH-velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics 49 (1984) 1933-1957
8. Virieux J. P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics 51 (1986) 889-901
9. Levander A.R. Fourth-order finite-difference P-SV seismograms. Geophysics 53 (1988) 1425-1436
10. Vaccari F, Nunziata C, Fäh D, Panza GF. Reduction of seismic vulnerability of megacities: the cases of Rome and Naples. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on seismic zonation, EERI, Oct. 1995, Nice, France; 1995. p. 1392-9.
11. PAGEOPH seismic ground motion in large urban areas. Panza GF, Paskaleva I, Nunziata C, editors. PAGEOPH topical, vol. 161(N5/6). Basel: Birkhauser; 2004.
12. Panza GF, Romanelli F, Vaccari F. Seismic wave propagation in laterally heterogeneous anelastic media: theory and applications to the seismic zonation. Advances in Geophysics, vol. 43. New York: Academic Press, 2001. p. 1-95.
13. Panza GF, Cioflan C, Kouteva M, Paskaleva I, Romanelli F. An innovative assessment of the seismic hazard from Vrancea intermediate-depth earthquakes: case studies in Romania and Bulgaria 2002, 12 ECEE, Ref. No. 230.
14. Triantafyllidis P., Hatzidimitriou P.M., Suhadolc P., Theodulidis N., and Pitilakis. Comparison between 1-D and 2-D site effects modelling of Thessaloniki. In: Irikura K. (Ed). The effects of the surface geology on seismic motion vol. 2 (1998), Balkema, Rotterdam 981-986
15. Sun R, Vaccari F, Marrara F, Panza GF. The main features of the local geological conditions can explain the macroseismic intensity caused in Xiji-langfu (Beijing) by the MS=7.7 Tangshan 1996 earthquake. PAGEOPH, vol. 152, 1998. p. 507-21.
16. Lokmer I., Herak M., Panza G.F., and Vaccari F. Amplification of strong ground motion in the city of Zagreb, Croatia, estimated by computation of synthetic seismograms. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 22 (2002) 105-113
17. Paskaleva I, Kouteva, M. A contribution to the seismic risk assessment of Sofia region and the town of Russe from deterministic modelling. Report on bilateral project "Engineering seismic hazard and risk assessment of selected cities in the Balkan region"; May-June 2001. p. 1-100.
18. Paskaleva I. A contribution to the seismic risk assessment of the Sofia City. Report on CNR- NATO program, 65, Announcement, 219.33; May-October 2002. p. 1-100.
19. Paskaleva I, Matova M, Frangov, G. Expert assessment of the displacements provoked by seismic events: case study for the Sofia metropolitan area. PAGEOPH 2004, 161, N5/6: 1265-83.
20. Paskaleva I., Panza G.F., Vaccari F., and Ivanov P. Deterministic modelling for microzonation of Sofia-an expected earthquake scenario. Acta Geod Geoph Hung 39 2-3 (2004) 275-295
21. Kouteva M, Panza GF, Paskaleva I, Romanelli, F. Modelling of the ground motion at Russe site due to Vrancea earthquakes. JEE; 2002.
22. Nenov D, Georgiev G, Paskaleva I, Lee V, Trifunac, M. Strong ground motion data in EQINFOS: accelerograms recorded in Bulgaria between 1981-1987, Report no. 90-02, University of South. California; 1990.
23. Tzankov Tz., and Nikolov G. Recent bilateral listric destruction in Western Stara Planina Mountain and Western Fore Balkan, Bulgaria. C R Bulg Acad Sci 49 4 (1996) 53-55
24. Shanov S., Tzankov Tz., Nikolov G., Bojkova A., and Kurtev K. Character of the recent geodynamics of sofia complex graben. Rev Bulg Geol Soc 59 1 (1998) 3-12
25. Ilieva M., and Josifov D. Structure of the Preneogene basement in the Sofia depression. Bulg Acad Sci Bulg Geophys J XXIV 1-2 (1998) 109-120
26. Solakov D., Simeonova St., and Christoskov L. Seismic hazard assessment for the Sofia area. Ann Geofis 44 3 (2001) 541-556
27. Christoskov L, Georgiev Tzv, Deneva D, Babachkova B. On the seismicity and seismic hazard of Sofia valley. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on the analysis of seismicity and seismic risk. Bechyne castle, CSSR, vol. IX; 1989. p. 448-54.
28. Dziewonski A., and Anderson D. Preliminary reference earth model. Phys Earth Planet Inter 25 (1981) 297-356
29. Stein S., and Wysession M. An introduction to seismology, earthquakes, and earth structure (2003), Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK
30. Frangov G. Assessment of the conditions and factors, determining the geological hazards at the Sofia kettle. Rep. to CGMR; 1995. p. 164-9 (in Bulgarian).
31. Ivanov, P. Assessment of the geological conditions in the Sofia Kettle under seismic impact. In: Proceedings of the international IAEG conference, Athens, Balkema, Rotterdam; 1997. p. 1265-70.
32. Ivanov Pl, Frangov G, Yaneva, M. Engineering geological characteristics of quaternary sediments in the Sofia graben. In: Proceedings of the 3rd WG Meeting, Dec. 2-5, Sofia; 1998. p. 33-7.
33. Watzov Sp. Tremblements de terre en Bulgaria au XIX siecle, IMPR. DE L'ETAT, Sofia, Bulg., 95; 1902 (in Bulgarian).
34. Bonchev E., Bune V., Christoskov L., Karagyuleva J., Kostadinov V., Reisner G., et al. A method for compilation of seismic zoning prognostic maps for the territory of Bulgaria. Geol Balkanica 12 2 (1982) 3-48
35. Shebalin N, Leydecker G, Mokrushina N, Tatevossian R, Erteleva O, Vassiliev V. Earthquake Catalogue for Central and Southeastern Europe 342 BC-1990 AD, European Commission, Report No. ETNU CT 93 - 0087; 1999.
36. Slavov Sl, Paskaleva I, Vaccari F, Kouteva M, Panza GF. Deterministic earthquake scenarios for the city of Sofia. PAGEOPH, vol. 161 (N5/6). 2004. p. 1221-37.
37. Matova M. Recent manifestations of seismotectonic activity in Sofia region and their land subsidence potential. In: Proceedings of the Final Conference of UNESCO-BAS Project on land subsidence, June 27-30, Sofia, 2001; p. 93-8.
38. Gorshkov A, Kuznetzov I, Panza GF, Soloviev, A. Identification of future earthquake sources in the Carpatho-Balkan orogenic belt using morphostructural criteria. Seismic hazard of the circum-pannonian region, PAGEOPH Topical Volumes. Basel: Birkhauser; 2000. p. 79-85.
39. Glavcheva R, Dimova SL. Seismic risk of the wide-spread residential buildings in Bulgaria. In: Proceedings of the first international conference "Natural risks: developments, tools and technologies in the CEI area", Sofia. 4-5 November 2003 (on CD).
40. Alexiev G., and Georgiev Tz. Morphotectonics and seismic activity of the Sofia depression. Bulg Acad Sci J Probl Geogr 1-2 (1997) 60-69
41. Slavov Sl. Ground modelling in the city of Sofia (TRIL-ICTP) 2000. Visitors report.
42. Field E.H., and Jacob K.H. A comparison and test of various site-response estimation techniques, including three that are not reference-site dependent. Bull Seism Soc Am 85 (1995) 1127-1143
43. Nakamura Y. A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Q Rept Railway Tech Res Inst 30 (1989) 25-33
44. Lachet C., and Bard P- Y. Numerical and theoretical investigations on the possibilities and limitations of Nakamura's technique. J Phys Earth 42 (1994) 377-397
45. Dravinski M., Ding G., and Wen K.-L. Analysis of spectral ratios for estimating ground motion in deep basins. Bull Seism Soc Am 86 (1996) 646-654
46. Field E.H. Spectral amplification in a sediment-filled valley exhibiting clear basin-edge-induced waves. Bull Seism Soc Am 86 (1996) 991-1005
47. Konno K., and Ohmachi T. Ground-motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor. Bull Seism Soc Am 88 (1998) 228-241
48. Bard P-Y. Local effects on strong ground motion: basic physical phenomena and estimation methods for microzoning studies. In: ITSAK, editor. SERINA-Seismic risk: an integrated seismological, geotechnical and structural approach, Thessaloniki; 1997.
49. Sileny J., and Panza G.F. Inversion of seismograms to determine simultaneously the moment tensor components and source time function for a point source buried in a horizontally layered medium. Stud Geophys Geod 35 (1991) 166-183
50. Sileny J., Panza G.F., and Campus P. Waveform inversion for point source moment tensor retrieval with variable hypocentral depth and structural model. Geophys J Int 109 (1992) 259-274
51. Field E.H. The SCEC Phase III Working Group. Accounting for site effects in probabilistic seismic hazard analyses of Southern California: overview of the SCEC Phase III report. Bull Seism Soc Am 90 6B (2000) S1-S31
52. Klügel J.-U., Mualchin L., and Panza G.F. A scenario-based procedure for seismic risk analysis. Eng Geol 88 (2006) 1-22. http://ww.sciencedirect.com 〈www.sciencedirect.com〉
53. Petkov I, Christoskov L. On seismicity in the region of the town of Sofia concerning the macroseismic zoning. Annaly Sofia University, vol. 58, 1965. p. 163-79.
54. Petrov P, Iliev, I. The effect of engineering geological conditions on seismic microzoning in Sofia. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European Symposium on EE, Sofia, Sept. 14-17, 1970. p. 79-86.
55. Todorovska M, Paskaleva I, Glavcheva R. Earthquake source parameters for seismic hazard assessment: examples of Bulgaria. In: Proceedings of the 10th ECEE Aug. 28-Sept. 2, Vienna, Austria; 1995.
56. Ferrara L. Design calculations, Ecoleader research project: seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete industrial buildings. Politecnico di Milano; 2002.
57. Dimova S.L., and Negro P. Seismic assessment of an industrial frame structure designed according to Eurocode. Part 1: experimental tests and their numerical simulation. Eng Struc 27 (2005) 709-723
58. Dimova S.L., and Negro P. Seismic assessment of an industrial frame structure designed according to Eurocode. Part 2: capacity and vulnerability. Eng Struc 27 (2005) 724-735
59. Valles RE, Reinhorn AM, Kunnath SK, Li C, Madan, AIDARC 2D. A computer program for the inelastic damage analysis of buildings. Technical report NCEER-96-0010, University of New York at Buffalo, New York; 1996.
60. Park Y.J., and Ang A.-S. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. J Struct Eng 111 (1985) 722-739
61. Bracci JM, Reinhorn AM, Mander JB, Kunnath SK. Deterministic model for seismic damage evaluation of reinforced concrete structures. Report NCEER-89-0033, State University of New York at Buffalo; 1989.
62. Rossetto T., and Elnashai A. Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Eng Struc 25 (2003) 1241-1263
63. Paskaleva I., and Dimova S. Preliminary results on 27, October, 2004 Vrancea earthquake case study on the Sofia strong ground. J Bulg Acad Sci 8 (2005)
64. Bulgarian Seismic Code for design and construction in seismic regions 1987, Sofia.
65. Stewart J, Chiou S, Bray J, Graves R, Somerville P, Abrahamson, N. Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance-based design. 2001. 〈http://peer.berkeley.edu/Products/PEERReports/reports-2001/0109.pdf〉
66. Somerville P.G., Smith N.F., Graves R.W., and Abrahamson N.A. Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismol Res Lett 68 (1997) 199-222