A scenario-based procedure for seismic risk analysis

Engineering Geology

Volumn 88, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 1-22

  Klugel J U ^a   Mualchin, L ^b   Panza, G F ^c,d  

^a Kernkraftwerk Goesgen Daeniken ^*  (Switzerland)

^b CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

^d ABDUS SALAM INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Italy)

Author keywords

Scenario based seismic hazard analysis; Siesmic risk analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; HAZARDS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRUCTURES (BUILT OBJECTS);

GUTENBERG-RICHTER EQUATION; PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT (PRA); PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS (PSHA); SEISMIC RISK ANALYSIS;

SEISMOLOGY;

DATABASE; METHODOLOGY; MODELING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC HAZARD; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 33750810212     PISSN: 00137952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abrahamson N.A. Deterministic and probabilistic assessments, northwest dam safety regional forum, Portland, Oregon (2006). http://www.ferc.gov/industries/hydropower/safety/wkshps/nw-forum.asp
2. Aki K., and Richards P.G. Quantitative seismology. University Science Books. Second ed. (2002) 700 pp.
3. Anderson J.G., Brune J.N., Anooshehpoor R., and Ni S.-D. New ground motion data and concepts in seismic hazard analysis. Curr. Sci. 79 (2000) 1278-1289
4. Arias A. A measure of earthquake intensity. In: Hansen R.J. (Ed). Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants (1970), MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
5. Atwood C.L. Constrained noninformative priors in risk assessment. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 53 (1996) 37-46
6. Bak P., and Tang C. Earthquakes as a self-organized critical phenomenon. J. Geophys. Res. 94 15 (1989) 635-637
7. Bath M. Introduction to Seismology (1973), J. Wiley, New York
8. Bolt B.A., and Abrahamson N.A. Estimation of Strong Ground Motion, International Handbook of Earthquake Engineering Seismology, IASPEI (2002)
9. Budnitz R.J., Chokshi N.C., Henries W., Ravindra M.K., Stevenson J., and Yee T. External Events PRA Methodology Standard, American Nuclear Society Standard BSR/ANS 58.21 (2003)
10. Calcagnile G., and Panza G.F. Magnitude from Rayleigh waves: time domain analysis of the influence of source parameters and structure. Riv. Ital. Geofis. 22 (1973) 117-120
11. Cancani A. Sur l'emploi d'une double echelle seismique des intensites, empirique et absolue. G. Beitr. 2 (1904) 281-283
12. Chapman M.C. On the use of elastic input energy for seismic hazard analysis. Earthq. Spectra 15 (1999) 607-635
13. Cornell C.A. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 58 (1968) 1583-1606
14. Decanini, L., Mollaioli, F., Oliveto, G., 1994. Observations and lessons learned from the earthquake of 13th December 1990 in South-East Sicily, Proc. of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Duma (Editor), Balkema, Wien, 1935-1943.
15. DOE. Accident Analysis for Aircraft Crash into Hazardous Facilities, Department of Energy, DOE-STD-3014-96 (1996)
16. Edwards A.W.F. Likelihood (1972), University Press, Cambridge
17. EPRI. Standardization of the Cumulative Absolute Velocity (1991) TR-10082
18. EPRI. Program on Technology Innovation: Use of CAV in determining effects of small magnitude earthquakes on seismic hazard analyses (2005) TI-1012965
19. Field E.H. The SCEC Phase III Working Group. Accounting for site effects in probabilistic seismic hazard analyses of Southern California: overview of the SCEC Phase III report. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90 6B (2000) S1-S31
20. Frankel A. Mapping seismic hazard in the Central and Eastern United States. Seismol. Res. Lett. 66 4 (1995) 8-21
21. s. PAGEOPH 158 (2001) 1517-1530
22. IAEA. Treatment of External Hazards in Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants, Safety Series No. 50-P-7. Vienna (1995)
23. IAEA. Evaluation of Seismic Hazards for Nuclear Power Plants, Safety Guide No. NS-G-3.3, Vienna (2002)
24. IAEA. Review of Probabilistic Safety Assessments by Regulatory Bodies. Safety Report Series Vol. 25 (2002) Vienna
25. Kaplan S., and Garrick B.J. On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal. 1 (1981) 11-27
26. Kijko A., and Graham G. Parametric-historical procedure for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Proceedings Eleventh European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paris (1998)
27. Klügel J.-U. Problems in the application of the SSHAC probability method for assessing earthquake hazards at Swiss nuclear power plants. Eng. Geol. 78 (2005) 285-307
28. Klügel, J.-U., 2005. Reply to the comment on J.U. Klügel's: "Problems in the Application of the SSHAC Probability Method for Assessing Earthquake Hazards at Swiss Nuclear Power Plants", provided by Robert J. Budnitz, C. Allin Cornell and Peter A. Morris, Engineering Geology, Vol. 78, pp. 285-307, Engineering Geology, Vol. 82, pp. 79-85.
29. Klügel, J.-U., 2005. Reply to the comment on J.U. Klügel's: "Problems in the Application of the SSHAC Probability Method for Assessing Earthquake Hazards at Swiss Nuclear Power Plants", Engineering Geology, Vol. 78, pp. 285-307, by Musson et al. Engineering Geology, Vol. 82, 56-65.
30. Klügel, J.-U., 2005. Reply to the comment on J.U. Klügel's: "Problems in the Application of the SSHAC Probability Method for Assessing Earthquake Hazards at Swiss Nuclear Power Plants", Engineering Geology, Vol. 78, pp. 285-307, by Dr. Wang, Engineering Geology, Vol. 82, pp.
31. Klügel J.-U. Paper KM02_2. On the use of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis as an input for seismic PSA. 18th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 18) Beijing, China (2005) August 7-12
32. Klügel J.-U. Challenges to seismic hazard analysis of critical infrastructures. AGU-Meeting, San Francisco (2005)
33. Klügel J.-U., Rao S., and Short S. Challenges to future seismic PRA. In: Spitzer C., Schmocker U., and Dang V.N. (Eds). Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management: 1232-1238 (2004), Springer, Berlin
34. McGuire R.K. FORTRAN computer program for seismic risk analysis: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 76-67 (1976)
35. Mc Guire R.K. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: closing the loop. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85 (1995) 1275-1284
36. Molchan G., Kronrod T., and Panza G.F. Multi-scale seismicity model for seismic risk. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 87 (1997) 1220-1229
37. Molchan G., Kronrod T., and Panza G.F. Shape analysis of isoseismals based on empirical and synthetic data. PAGEOPH 159 (2002) 1229-1251
38. Mollaioli F., Decanini L., Bruno S., and Panza G.F. Analysis of the Response Behaviour of Structures Subjected to Damaging Pulse-type Ground Motions. OECD Workshop on the Relations Between Seismological DATA and Seismic Engineering, Istanbul, 16-18 October 2002. NEA/CSNI/R vol. 18 (2002) 109-119
39. Mualchin L. A Technical Report to Accompany the Caltrans California Seismic Hazard Map 1996 (1996), California Department of Transportation, Engineering Service Center, Sacramento
40. Noubary R. Statistical Methods for Earthquake Hazard Assessment and Risk Analysis (2000), Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York
41. Panza G.F., and Calcagnile G. Some remarks about the focal effect on the magnitude determination from Rayleigh waves. Geol. Inst. Tech. Econ. St., Geophys. Prosp.,Bucuresti vol. 10 (1974) 328-334
42. Panza G.F., Romanelli F., Vaccari F., Decanini L., and Mollaioli F. Contribution of the Deterministic Approach to the Characterization of Seismic Input, OECD-NEA Workshop on Engineering Characterization of Seismic Input, BNL, Upton, New York, 15-17 November, 1999. NEA/CSNI/R vol. 2 (2000) 655-715
43. Panza G.F., Romanelli F., and Vaccari F. Seismic wave propagation in laterally heterogeneous anelastic media: theory and applications to the seismic zonation. Advances in Geophysics vol. 42 (2001), Academic press 1-95
44. Panza G.F., Romanelli F., Vaccari F., Decanini L., and Mollaioli F. Seismic hazard evaluation in South-Central Europe and Mediterranean region: state of the art. Proc. Fourth International Conference of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology 12-14 May 2003 Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran (2003)
45. Panza G.F., Romanelli F., Vaccari F., Decanini L., and Mollaioli F. Seismic Ground Motion Modelling and Damage Earthquake Scenarios, a Bridge between Seismologists and Seismic Engineers. OECD Workshop on the Relations between Seismological DATA and Seismic Engineering, Istanbul, 16-18 October 2002. NEA/CSNI/R vol. 18 (2003) 241-266
46. Parvez A.I., Gusev A.A., Panza G.F., and Petukhin A.G. Preliminary determination of interdependence among strong motion amplitude, earthquake magnitude and hypocentral distance for the Hymalayan region. Geophys. J. Int. 144 (2001) 577-596
47. Pegler G., and Das S. Analysis of the relationship between seismic moment and fault length for large crustal strike-slip earthquakes between 1977-1992. Geophys. Res. Lett. 23 (1996) 905-908
48. Poloski J.P., Marksberry D.G., Atwood C.L., and Galyean W.J. Rates of Initiating Events at U.S. Nuclear Power Plants: 1987 - 1995, NUREG/CR-5750 (1999)
49. Richwalski S.M., Roth F., and Wang R. Erdbebensimulation von Bodenerschütterungen im Bereich kritischer Bauwerke. In: Merz B., and Apel H. (Eds). Risiken durch Naturgefahren in Deutschland. Abschlussbericht des BMBF-Verbundprojektes Deutsches Forschungsnetz Naturkatastrophen (DFNK) (2004) 161-170
50. Scholz C.H. The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting. 2nd edition (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
51. Schwartz D.P., and Coppersmith K.J. Fault behaviour and characteristic earthquakes: examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas fault zones. J. Geophys. Res. 89 (1984) 5681-5698
52. Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis Committee (SSHAC). Recommendations for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis: Guidance on Uncertainty and Use of Experts. NU-REG/CR-6372 (1997)
53. Tregoning, R., Abramson, L., Scott, P., 2005. Estimating Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) frequencies through elicitation process, NUREG-1829, Draft report for comment.
54. Uang C.M., and Bertero V.V. Evaluation of seismic energy in structures. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 19 (1990) 77-90
55. Veneziano D., Cornell C.A., and O'Hara T. Historical method of seismic hazard analysis. Electrical Power Research Institute Report NP-3438 (1984), Palo Alto, California
56. Wang Z. Comment on J.U. Krügel's: Problems in the application of the SSHAC probability method for assessing earthquake hazards at Swiss nuclear power plants, in Engineering geology, Vol. 78, pp. 285-307. Eng. Geol. 82 (2005) 86-88
57. Wells D.L., and Coppersmith K.J. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84 4 (1994) 974ff
58. Woo G. Kernel estimation methods for seismic hazard area source modelling. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 86 (1996) 353-362