Inflorescence diversification in the "finger millet clade" (Chloridoideae, Poaceae): A comparison of molecular phylogeny and developmental morphology

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 94, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1230-1247

  Liu, Qing ^a   Peterson, Paul M ^b   Columbus, J Travis ^c   Zhao, Nanxian ^a   Hao, Gang ^d   Zhang, Dianxiang ^a  

^a SOUTH CHINA INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

^c RANCHO SANTA ANA BOTANIC GARDEN   (United States)

^d SOUTH CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Chloridoideae; Development; Finger millet clade; Inflorescence; Phylogeny; Poaceae

Indexed keywords

CEREAL; CLADISTICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; DNA; MOLECULAR ECOLOGY;

CHLORIDOIDEAE; CHLORIS; DACTYLOCTENIUM; ELEUSINE; ELEUSINE CORACANA; MICROCHLOA; POACEAE;

EID: 34447331430     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.94.7.1230     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. BARKER, F. K., AND F. M. LUTZONI. 2002. The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Systematic Biology 51: 625-637.
2. BORTIRI, E., G. CHUCK, E. VOLLBRECHT, T. ROCHEFORD, R. MARTIENSSEN, AND S. HAKE. 2006. RAMOSA2 encodes a LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARY domain protein that determines the fate of stem cells in branch meristems of maize. Plant Cell 18: 574-585.
3. CÁMARA-HERNÁNDEZ, J., AND G. H. RUA. 1991. The synflorescence of Poaceae. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 66: 297-311.
4. CHEN, S. L. 1990. Gramineae (4) - subfamily Eragrostoideae Pilger. In S. L. Chen [ed.], Flora reipublicae popularis sinicae, vol. 10, 1-131. Science Press, Beijing, China.
5. CLAYTON, W. D., AND S. A. RENVOIZE. 1986. Genera graminum. Kew Bulletin Additional Series XIII. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, UK. 389.
6. DOUST, A. N., AND E. A. KELLOGG. 2002. Inflorescence diversification in the panicoid "bristle grass" clade (Paniceae, Poaceae): evidence from molecular phylogenies and developmental morphology. American Journal of Botany 89: 1203-1222.
7. DOYLE, J. J., AND J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh tissues. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
8. ERDTMAN, G. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy - angiosperms. Almqvist and Wilksell, Stockholm, Sweden. 466.
9. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
10. FARRIS, J. S., A. G. KLUGE, AND M. J. ECKARDT. 1970. A numerical approach to phylogenetic systematics. Systematic Zoology 19: 172-191.
11. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution 17: 368-376.
12. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits of phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
13. FITCH, W. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree typology. Systematic Zoology 20: 406-416.
14. GOLOBOFF, P. A. 1993. NONA version 2.0. Computer program published by the author, Tucumán, Argentina (available at http://www.cladistics.com).
15. HILU, K. W., AND L. A. ALICE. 2001. A phylogeny of Chloridoideae (Poaceae) based on matK sequences. Systematic Botany 26: 386-405.
16. HIPP, A. L., J. C. HAII, AND K. J. SYTSMA. 2004. Congruence versus phylogenetic accuracy: revisiting the incongruence length difference test. Systematic Biology 53: 81-89.
17. HUFFORD, L. 2003. Homology and developmental transformation: models for the origins of the staminodes of Loasaceae subfamily Loasoideae. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164 (5 Supplement): S409-S439.
18. JACOBS, S. W. L., AND J. EVERETT. 2000. Grasses: systematics and evolution. CSIRO, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia.
19. KELLOGG, E. A. 2004. Evolution of developmental traits. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 7: 92-98.
20. KENG, Y. L. 1959. Flora illustralis plantarum primarum sinicarum Gramineae. Science Press, Beijing, China.
21. LIU, Q., N. X. ZHAO, AND G. HAO. 2005a. Inflorescence structures and evolution in subfamily Chloridoideae (Gramineae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 251: 183-198.
22. LIU, Q., N. X. ZHAO, AND G. HAO. 2005b. Phylogenetic relationships of the Chloridoideae (Gramineae): a cladistic analysis. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany 13: 432-442.
23. MADDSION, D. R., AND W. P. MADDSION. 2000. MacClade, version 4.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
24. NIKLAS, K. J. 1987. Pollen capture and wind-induced movement of compact and diffuse grass panicles: implications for pollination efficiency. American Journal of Botany 74: 74-89.
25. NIXON, K. C. 2002. WinClada, version 1.00.08. Computer program published by the author, Ithaca, New York, USA (available at http://www.cladistics.com).
26. OXELMAN, B., M. LIDÉN, AND D. BERGLUND. 1997. Chloroplast rps16 intron phylogeny of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 206: 393-410.
27. PETERSON, P. M., R. J. SORENG, G. DAVIDSE, T. S. FILGUEIRAS, F. O. ZULOAGA, AND E. J. JUDZIEWICZ. 2001. Catalogue of New World grasses (Poaceae). II. Subfamily Chloridoideae. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium 41: 1-255.
28. PETERSON, P. M., R. D. WEBSTER, AND J. VALDES-REYNA. 1997. Genera of New World Eragrostideae (Poaceae: Chloridoideae). Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 87: 1-50.
29. POE, S., AND J. J. WIENS. 2000. Characters selection and the methodology of morphological phylogenetics. In J. J. Wiens [ed.], Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data, 20-36. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
30. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
31. ROODT, R., AND J. J. SPIES. 2003. Chromosome studies in the grass subfamily Chloridoideae. I. Basic chromosome numbers. Taxon 53: 557-566.
32. SATOH-NAGASAWA, N., N. NAGASAWA, S. MALCOMBER, H. SAKAI, AND D. JACKSON. 2006. A trehalosa metabolic enzyme controls inflorescence architecture in maize. Nature 441: 227-230.
33. SHAW, J., AND R. L. SMALL. 2004. Addressing the "hardest puzzle in American pomology": phylogeny of Prunus sect. Prunocerasus (Rosaceae) based on seven noncoding chloroplast DNA regions. American Journal of Botany 91: 985-996.
34. STEVENS, P. F. 1991. Character states, morphological variation, and phylogenetic analysis: a review. Systematic Botany 16: 553-583.
35. STUESSY, T. F. 2003. Morphological data in plant systematics. In T. F. Stuessy, V. Mayer, and E. Hörandl [eds.], Deep morphology: toward a renaissance of morphology in plant systematics, 299-315. Gantner, Koeltz, Königstein, Germany.
36. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
37. TABERLET, P., L. GIELLY, G. PAUTOU, AND J. BOUVET. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of choroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
38. THOMPSON, J. D., T. J. GIBSON, F. PLEWNIAK, F. EANMOUGIN, AND D. G. HIGGINS. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876-4882.
39. VAN DEN BORRE, A., AND L. WATSON. 1997. On the classification of the Chloridoideae. Australian Systematic Botany 10: 491-531.
40. VEGETTI, A. C. 1986. Contribución al conocimiento de las inflorescencias en Chloris y Cynodon (Poaceae). Kurtziana 18: 109-120.
41. VOLLBRECHT, E., P. S. SPRINGER, L. GOH, E. S. BUCKLER, AND R. MARTIENSSEN. 2005. Architecture of floral branch systems in maize and related grasses. Nature 436: 1119-1126.
42. WIENS, J. J. 2001. Character analysis in morphological phylogenetics: problem and solutions. Systematic Biology 50: 689-699.
43. YODER, A. D., J. A. IRWIN, AND B. A. PAYSEUR. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow Loris phylogeny. Systematic Biology 50: 408-424.