Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy for detecting prostate cancer: Can random biopsies be reduced using the 4-dimensional technique?

International Urology and Nephrology

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 517-524

  Abul, Fawzi T ^a   Arun, Narayanaswamy ^b   Abu Assi, Mona A ^c   Asbeutah, Akram M ^a  

^a KUWAIT UNIVERSITY   (Kuwait)

^b AL AMIRI HOSPITAL   (Kuwait)

^c MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT   (Kuwait)

Author keywords

Prostate cancer; Prostate guided biopsy; Prostatic specific antigen; Transrectal ultrasound

Indexed keywords

CIPROFLOXACIN; GENTAMICIN; PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER MORTALITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; SEPSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 34447298585     PISSN: 03011623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-006-9060-2     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Troyer DA, Mubiru J, Leach RJ et al (2004) Promise and challenge: markers of prostate cancer detection, diagnosis and prognosis. Dis Markers 20:117-128
2. Kataja VV (2003) ESMO Guidelines. Task force ESMO minimum clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of prostate cancer. Ann Oncol 14:1010-1011
3. Cheon J, Kim CS, Lee ES et al (2002) Survey of incidence of urological cancer in South Korea: A 15-year summary. Int J Urol 9:445-454
4. Hernandez J, Thompson IM (2004) Prostate-specific antigen: A review of the validation of the most commonly used cancer biomarker. Cancer 101:894-904
5. Watanabe H, Igari D, Tanahashi Y et al (1975) Transrectal ultrasonography of the prostate. J Urol 114:734-739
6. Loch T, McNeal JE, Stamey TA (1995) Interpretation of bilateral positive needle biopsies in prostate cancer. J Urol 154:1078-1083
7. Perrin P, Maquet JH, Bringeon G et al (1991) Screening for prostate cancer: Comparison of transrectal ultrasound, prostate-specific antigen and rectal examination. Br J Urol 68:263-265
8. Drago JR, York JP (1992) Prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination, and transrectal ultrasound in predicting the probability of prostate cancer. J Surg Oncol 49(3):172-175
9. Lee F, Littrup PJ, Torp-Pedersen ST et al (1988) Prostate cancer: comparison of transrectal US, and digital rectal examination for screening. Radiology 168:389-394
10. Gustafsson O, Norming U, Almgard LE et al (1992) Diagnostic methods in the detection of prostate cancer: A study of randomly selected population of 2,400 men. J Urol 148:1827-1831
11. Potter SR, Horniger W, Tinzl M et al (2001) Age, prostate-specific antigen, and digital rectal examination as determinants of the probability of having prostate cancer. Urology 57(6):1100-1104
12. Vallancien G, Prapotnich D, Veillon B (1991) Systematic prostate biopsies in 100 men with no suspicion of prostate cancer on digital rectal examination. J Urol 146(5):1308-1312
13. Rifkin MD, Zerhouni EA, Gatsonis CA et al (1990) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer. N Engl JMed 323:621-626
14. Flanigan RC, Catalona WJ, Ritchie JP et al (1994) Accuracy of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in localizing prostate cancer. J Urol 152:1506-1509
15. Vo TDO, Rifkin MD, Peters TL (2001) Should ultrasound criteria of the prostate be redefined to better evaluate when and where to biopsy? Ultrasound Quaterly 17(3):171-176
16. Rifkin MD, Choi H (1988) Implications of small peripheral hypoechoic lesions in endorectal US of the prostate. Radiology 166:619
17. Tang J, Li X, Wang N et al (2005) Correlation between hypoechoic nodules on ultrasonography and benign hyperplasia in the prostate outer gland. J Ultrasound Med 24:483-488
18. Oyen RH, Van de Voorde WM, Van Poppel HP et al (1993) Benign hyperplastic nodules that originate in the peripheral zone of the prostate gland. Radiology 189:707-711
19. Loch T, Eppelemann U, Lehmann J et al (2004) Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: Random sextant versus biopsies of sono-morphologically suspicious lesions. World J Urol 22:357-360
20. Ellis WJ, Brawer MK (1994) The significance of isoechoic prostatic carcinoma. J Urol 152:2304-2307
21. Al-Ghazo MA, Ghalayini IF, Matalka II (2005) Ultrasound-guided transrectal extended prostate biopsy: A prospective study. Asian J Androl 7(2):165-169
22. Fleshner N, Klotz L (2002) Role of 'saturation biopsy' in the detection of prostate cancer among difficult diagnostic cases. Urology 60:93-97
23. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK et al (1989) Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142:71-75
24. Gupta NP, Ansari MS, Dass SC (2005) Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy for detecting early prostate cancer: An Indian experience. Indian J Cancer 42(3):151-154
25. Fink KG, Hutarew G, Pytel A et al (2003) One 10-core prostate biopsy is superior to two sets of sextant prostate biopsies. BJU Int 92:385-388
26. Naughton CK, Miller DC, Mager DE et al (2000) A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: Impact on cancer detection. J Urol 164(2):388-392
27. Rodriguez RP, Dehesa TM, Gonzalez AM et al (2005) Results of a series of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate in 6000 patients. Part I. Pathology, digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound, and PSA. Arch Esp Urol 58(7):611-622
28. Miyake H, Kurahashi T, Murmaki M et al (2005) Significance of routine transitional zone biopsies in Japanese men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies. Intl J Urol 12(11):964-968
29. Purohit RS, Shinohara K, Meng MV et al (2003) Imaging clinically localized prostate cancer. Urol Clin N Am 30:279-293
30. Mehta SS, Azzouzi AR, Hamdy FC (2004) Three dimensional ultrasound and prostate cancer. World J Urol 22:339-345