Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: Random sextant versus biopsies of sono-morphologically suspicious lesions

World Journal of Urology

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 357-360

  Loch, Tillmann ^a   Eppelmann, Ursula ^b   Lehmann, Jan ^c   Wullich, Bernd ^c   Loch, Annemie ^a   Stöckle, Michael ^c  

^a Ev Luth Diakonissenanstalt zu Flensburg   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^c SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Early detection; Prostate biopsies; Prostate cancer diagnosis; Systematic biopsies; TRUS

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ARTICLE; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PREDICTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; UNNECESSARY PROCEDURE;

BIOPSY; HUMANS; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE; RECTUM;

EID: 13644268432     PISSN: 07244983     EISSN: 14338726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-004-0462-4     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Potosky AL, Miller BA, Albertson PC, Kramer BS (1995) The role of increasing detection in the rising incidence of prostate cancer. JAMA 273:548-552 10.1001/jama.273.7.548
2. Shinohara K, Scardino PT, Carter SC, Wheeler TM (1989) Pathologic basis of the sonographic appearance of the normal and malignant prostate. Urol Clin Am 16:675-678 1:STN:280:By%2BD2M%2FnsFM%3D
3. Lee F, Gray JM, McLeary RD, Meadows TK, Kumasaka GH, Borlaza GS, Straub WH, Lee FJr, Solomon MH, McHugh TA et al. (1985) Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: Location, echogenicity, histopathology, and staging. Prostate 7:117-129 1:STN:280:BimD3MnktlQ%3D
4. Ellis WJ, Brawer MK (1994) The significance of isoechoic prostatic carcinoma. J Urol 152:2304-2307 1:STN:280:ByqD2MnhvVY%3D
5. Mettlin C, Murphy GP, Babaian RJ, Chesley A, Kane RA, Littrup PJ, Mostofi FK, Ray PS, Shanberg AM, Toi A (1996) The results of a five-year early prostate cancer detection intervention. Investigators of the American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Cancer 77:150-159 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960101)77:1<150::AID-CNCR25>3.3.CO;2-M
6. Nava L, Montorsi F, Consonni P, Scattoni V, Guazzoni G, Rigatti PJ (1997) Results of a prospective randomized study comparing 6, 12 and 18 transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies in patients with elevated PSA, normal DRE, and normal prostatic ultrasound. Urology 157:59
7. Vashi AR, Wojno KJ, Gillespie B, Oesterling JE (1997) Patient age and prostate gland size determine the appropriate number of cores per prostate biopsy. J Urol 157:365
8. Jones JS, Oder M, Zippe CD (2002) Saturation biopsy with periprostatic block can be performed in office. J Urol 168:2108-2110 10.1097/00005392-200211000-00050
9. Fleshner N, Klotz L (2002) Role of "saturation biopsy" in the detection of prostate cancer among difficult diagnostic cases. Urology 60:93-97 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01625-4
10. Chrouser KL, Lieber MM (2004) Extended and saturation needle biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep 5:226-230 15161572
11. Loch T, Gettys T, Cochran JS, Fulgham PF, Bertermann H (1990) Computer-aided image-analysis in transrectal ultrasound of the prostate. World J Urol 8:150-153
12. Holm HH, Gammelgaard J (1981) Ultrasonocally guided precise needle placement in the prostate and the seminal vesicles. J Urol 142:66-70
13. Lee F, McLeary RD, Meadows TR (1985) Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostatic cancer: Location, echogenicity, histopathology and staging. Prostate 7:117-129 1:STN:280:BimD3MnktlQ%3D
14. Loch T, McNeal JE, Stamey TA (1995) Interpretation of bilateral positive biopsies in prostate cancer. J Urol 154:1078-1083 10.1097/00005392-199509000-00048
15. Terris MK, Freiha FS, McNeal JE, Stamey TA (1991) Efficiacy of transrectal ultrasound for identification of clinically undetected prostate cancer. J Urol 146:78 1:STN:280:By6B2sfitFc%3D
16. Norberg M, Egevad L,Holmberg L, Sparen P, Norlen B J, Busch C (1997) The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology 50:562-566 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00306-3
17. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA (1989) Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142:71-75 1:STN:280:BiaB1c%2FgslY%3D
18. Bertermann H, Wirth B, Penkert A, Hansmann ML (1989) Ultraschallgezielte transrektale Prostatabiopsie: Bei 1 cm-Läsionen sicher im Ziel. Z Urol Poster 2:110-113
19. Loch T, Bertermann H, Stöckle M (2000) Technische und anatomische Grundlagen des transrektalen Ultraschalls (TRUS) der Prostata. Urologe B 40:475-483 10.1007/s001310050443
20. Ravery V, Billebaud T, Toublanc M, Boccon-Gibod L, Hermieu JF, Moulinier F, Blanc E, Delmas V (1999) Diagnostic value of ten systematic TRUS-guided prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 35: 298-303 10.1159/000019866