Electrical impedance model for evaluation of skin irritation in rabbits and humans

Skin Research and Technology

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 259-267

  Ferreira, D M ^a   Silva, C S ^a   Souza, M N ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Electrical impedance; Irritation; Non invasive methods; Skin; SLS

Indexed keywords

IRRITATION; NON-INVASIVE METHOD; VISUAL INSPECTION;

CORRELATION METHODS; DERMATOLOGY; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; INSPECTION;

SKIN;

DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM;

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NONHUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; RABBIT; SCORING SYSTEM; SKIN CONDUCTANCE; SKIN IRRITATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANIMALS; DERMATITIS, CONTACT; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTRONICS, MEDICAL; FEMALE; HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS; HUMANS; IRRITANTS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RABBITS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SKIN IRRITANCY TESTS; SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE;

EID: 34447273802     PISSN: 0909752X     EISSN: 16000846     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2007.00217.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Wahlberg JE. Clinical overview of irritant dermatitis. In: Van der Valk P.G.M., Maibach H.I., eds. The irritant contact dermatitis syndrome. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1996: 1-6.
2. Gerberick GF, Robinson MK. A skin sensitization risk assessment approach for evaluation of new ingredients and products. Am J Contact Dermatitis 2000; 11: 65-73.
3. Robinson MK, Osborne R, Perkins MA. In vitro and human testing strategies for skin irritation. Ann NY Acad Sci 2000; 919: 192-204.
4. Draize JH, Woodard G, Calvery HO. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J Pharm Exp Ther 1944; 82: 377-390.
5. Nixon GA, Tyson CA, Wertz WC. Interspecies comparisons of skin irritancy. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1975; 31: 481-490.
6. York M, Griffiths HA, Whittle E, Basketter DA. Evaluation of a human patch test for the identification and classification of skin irritation potential. Contact Dermatitis 1996 204-212.
7. Basketter D, Reynolds FS, York M. Predictive testing in contact dermatitis: Irritant dermatitis. Clin Dermatol 1999; 15: 637-644.
8. Serup J, Jemec GBE. Handbook of noninvasive methods and the skin. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1995.
9. Emtestam L, Ollmar S. Electrical impedance index in human skin: Measurements after occlusion, in 5 anatomical regions and in mild irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 28: 104-108.
10. Ollmar S, Eek E, Sundstrom F, Emtestam L. Electrical impedance for estimation of irritation in oral mucosa and skin. Med Prog through Technol 1995; 21: 29-37.
11. Ollmar S, Nyren M, Nicander I, Emtestam L. Electrical impedance compared with other non-invasive bioengineering techniques and visual scoring for detection of irritation in human skin. Brit J Dermatol 1994; 130: 29-36.
12. Ollmar S. Methods of information extraction from impedance spectra of biological tissue, in particular skin and oral mucosa - a critical review and suggestions for the future. Bioelectrochem Bioenergetic 1998; 45: 157-160.
13. Neves CEB, Souza MN. A method for bio-electrical impedance analysis based on a step-voltage response. Physiol Meas 2000; 21: 395-408.
14. Grimnes S, Martinsen G. Cole electrical impedance model - a critique and an alternative. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005; 52: 132-135.
15. Poon CS, Choy TTC. Frequency dispersions of human skin dielectrics. Biophys J 1981; 34: 135-147.
16. Kontturi K, Murtomäki L, Hirvonen J, Paronen P, Urtti A. Electrochemical characterization of human skin by impedance spectroscopy. The effect of penetration enhancers. Pharm Res 1993; 10: 381-385.
17. Desoer CA, Kuh ES. Laplace transforms. In: International Student eds. Basic circuit theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969: 527-581.
18. Nicander I, Ollmar S, Lundh Rozell B, Eek A, Emtestam L. Electrical impedance measured to five skin depths in mild irritant dermatitis induced by sodium lauryl sulphate. Brit J Dermatol 1995; 132: 718-724.
19. Nicander I, Rundquist L, Ollmar S. Electric impedance measurements at six different anatomic locations of macroscopically normal human oral mucosa. Acta Odontol Scand 1997; 55: 88-93.
20. PiriläV. Chamber test vs. patch test for epicutaneous testing. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 48-52.
21. Löffler H, Happle R. Profile of irritant patch testing with detergents: Sodium lauryl sulphate, sodium laureth sulphate and alkyl polyglucoside. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 48: 26-32.
22. Agner T, Serup J. Sodium lauryl sulphate for irritation patch testing - a dose-response study using bioengineering methods for determination of skin irritation. J Invest Dermatol 1990; 95: 543-547.
23. Tregear RT. Physical functions of skin. New York: Academic Press, 1966.
24. Neuman RN. Biopotencial electrodes. In: Webster JG, ed. Medical instrumentation. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1992: 236-239.
25. Salter DC. Quantifying skin disease and healing in vivo using electrical impedance measurements. In: Rolfe P, ed. Non-invasive physiological measurements, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 1979.
26. Cole KS. Electric impedance of suspensions of spheres. J Gen Physiol 1928; 12: 29-36.
27. Yamamoto T, Yamamoto Y. Analysis for the change of skin impedance. Med Biol Eng Comp 1977; 15: 219-227.