Irritant dermatitis

Clinics in Dermatology

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 637-644

  Basketter, David A ^a   Reynolds, Fiona S ^a   York, Michael ^a  

^a UNILEVER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; CELL MATURATION; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; HEALTH HAZARD; IRRITANT DERMATITIS; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKIN MANIFESTATION; TOXICOLOGICAL PARAMETERS;

ANIMALS; DERMATITIS, IRRITANT; HUMANS; IRRITANTS; SKIN; SKIN TESTS;

EID: 0030803485     PISSN: 0738081X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0738-081X(97)00065-5     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. European Community. Annex to Commission Directive 92/69/EEC of 31 July 1992 adapting to technical progress for the seventeenth time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Official J of the European Communities 1992a;L383A:35.
2. United States Food and Drug Administration. Hazardous substances. Proposed revisions of test for primary skin irritants. Fed Reg 1972;37:27635.
3. United Nations. Recommendations in the transport of dangerous goods. 8th ed. United Nations. ST/SG.AC.10/ REv. 8. 1993:185.
4. European Community. Council regulation EEC No 793/93 of 23 March 1993 on the evaluation and control of the risks of existing substances. Official J of the European Communities 1993;L18:14.
5. European Community. Council Directive of 7 June 1988 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations. Official J of the European Communities 1988; L18:14.
6. Federal Hazardous Substances Act. Federal Register. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Code of Federal Regulations 1979; Title 16, part 1500.42. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
7. European Community. Directive 92/59/EC on general product safety. Official J of the European Communities 1992b;L228:24-32.
8. Draize JH, Woodard G, Calvery HO. Methods for the study of imitation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1944;82:377-90.
9. Draize JH. Dermal toxicity. In appraisal of the safety of chemicals in foods, drugs and cosmetics. Littleton, Colorado: Association of Foods and Drugs Officials of the United States, 1959:46-59.
10. Opdyke DL, Snyder FH, Rubenkoenig HL. Toxicological studies on household synthetic detergents. II Effects on the skin and eyes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1964;6:141-6.
11. Jenkins HL, Adams MG. Progressive evaluation of skin irritancy of cosmetics using human volunteers. Int J Cosmetic Sci 1989;11:141-9.
12. Patil S, Patrick E, Maibach HI. Predictive skin irritation tests in animals and humans. In: Marzulli FN & Maibach HI, editors. In dermatotoxicology. 5th ed. Washington: Hemisphere Publishing, 1996:411-37.
13. Simion FA. In vivo models to predict skin irritation. In: Van der Valk P, Maibach HI, editors. The irritant contact dermatitis syndrome. New York: CRC Press, 1996:329-34.
14. Balls M, Botham PA, Bruner LH, et al. The EC/HO international validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test. Toxicol In Vitro 1995;9:871-929.
15. Basketter DA, Whittle E, Chamberlain M. Identification of irritation and corrosion hazards in skin: an alternative strategy to animal testing. Food Chem Toxicol 1994;32: 539-42.
16. Basketter DA, Whittle E, Griffiths HA, et al. The identification and classification of skin irritation hazard by a human patch test. Food Chem Toxicol 1994;32:769-75.
17. Oliver GJA, Pemberton MA. The identification of corrosive agents for human skin in vitro. Food Chem Toxicol 1986;24:513-5.
18. Oliver GJA, Pemberton MA, Rhodes C. An in vitro skin corrosivity test - modifications and validation. Food Chem Toxicol 1986;24:507-12.
19. Whittle E, Basketter DA. The in vitro corrosivity test: development of the method using human skin. Toxicol In Vitro 1993;7:265-8.
20. Whittle E, Basketter DA. The in vitro skin corrosivity test. Comparison of in vitro human skin with in vivo data. Toxicol In Vitro 1993;7:269-73.
21. Lewis RW, Basketter DA. Transcutaneous electrical resistance: application in predicting skin corrosives. In: P Elsner, HI Maibach, editors. Irritant dermatitis: New clinical and experimental aspects, Basel: Karger, 1995:243-55.
22. Whittle E, Barratt MD, Carter JA, et al. Use of QSAR and an in vitro skin corrosivity test to investigate the corrosion/irritation potential of organic acids. Toxicol In Vitro 1996;10:95-100.
23. York M, Basketter DA, Cuthbert JA, et al. Skin irritation testing in man for hazard assessment - evaluation of four patch systems. Hum Exp Toxicol 1995;14:729-34.
24. York M, Griffiths HA, Whittle E, et al. Evaluation of a human patch test for the identification and classification of skin irritation potential. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34: 204-12.
25. Lee CH, Maibach HI. The sodium lauryl sulfate model: an overview. Contact Dermatitis 1995;33:1-7.
26. Weil CS, Scala A. Study of intra- and inter-laboratory variability in the results of rabbit eye and skin irritation tests. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1971;19:276-360.
27. Griffiths HA, Wilhelm K-P, Robinson M, et al. Interlaboratory evaluation of a human 4h patch test for the evaluation of skin irritation potential/hazard. Food Chem Toxicol 1997;35:255-60.
28. Judge MR, Griffiths HA, Basketter DA, et al. Variation in response of human skin to irritant challenge. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34:115-7.
29. Basketter DA, Griffiths HA, Wang XM, et al. Individual, ethnic and seasonal variability in irritant susceptibility of skin: the implications for a predictive human patch test. Contact Dermatitis 1996;35:208-13.
30. Rohm and Haas Technical bulletin on Kathon CG, 1989.
31. Walker AP, Basketter DA, Baverel M, et al. Test guideline for assessment of skin compatibility of cosmetic finished products in man. Food Chem Toxicol 1996;34:651-60.
32. Hannuksela A, Hannuksela M. Irritant effects of a detergent in wash and chamber tests. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 32:163-6.
33. Allenby CF, Basketter DA. An arm immersion model of compromised skin. II. Influence on minimal eliciting patch test concentrations of nickel. Contact Dermatitis 1993;28:129-33.
34. Pierard GE, Arrese JE, Rodriguez C, et al. Effects of softened and unsoftened fabrics on sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis 1994;30:286-91.
35. Frosch PJ, Kurte A. Efficacy of skin barrier creams (IV). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) with a set of 4 standard irritants. Contact Dermatitis 1994;31:161-8.
36. Paye M, Morrison BM, Wilhelm K-P. Skin irritancy classification of body cleansing products. Skin Res Technology 1995;1:30-5.
37. Bannan EA, Griffith JF, Nusair TL, et al. Skin testing of laundered fabrics in the dermal safety assessment of enzyme containing detergents. J Toxicol Cutan Ocul Toxicol 1992;11:327-39.
38. Hayakawa R, Suzuki M, Kato Y, et al. Study of the safety and usefulness of hypo-irritant skin care products (PHS-511: soap, shampoo, lotion) for children. Environ Dermatol 1995;2:50-8.
39. Soschin D, Kligman AM. Adverse subjective responses. In: Safety and efficacy of topical drugs and cosmetics. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1982:377-88.
40. Frosch P, Kligman AM. A method for appraising the stinging capacity of topically applied substances. J Soc Cosmetic Chem 1977;28:197-209.
41. Basketter DA, Griffiths HA. A study of the relationship between susceptibility to skin stinging and skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis 1993;29:185-8.
42. Serup J, Jemee GBE. Handbook of Non-Invasive Methods and the Skin. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1995.