Artifacts as conventional objects

Journal of Cognition and Development

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 183-203

  Siegel, Deborah R ^a   Callanan, Maureen A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTROSPECTION; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; THINKING;

EID: 34447262327     PISSN: 15248372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15248370701202414     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Biel, S. (2005). American Gothic: A life of America's most famous painting. New York: Norton.
2. Bloom, P., & Markson, L. (1998). Intention and analogy in children's naming of pictorial representations. Psychological Science, 9, 200-204.
3. Clark, E. V. (1991). Acquisitional principles in lexical development. In S. A. Gelman & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on thought and language: Interrelations in development (pp. 31-71). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4. Clark, E. V. (1992). Conventionality and contrast: Pragmatic principles with lexical consequences. In E. F. Kittay & A. Lehrer (Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization (pp. 171-188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Defeyter, M. A., & German, T. P. (2003). Acquiring an understanding of design: Evidence from children's insight problem solving. Cognition, 89, 133-155.
6. Dennett, D. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Diesendruck, G., Markson, L., & Bloom, P. (2003). Children's reliance on creator's intent in extending names for artifacts. Psychological Science, 14, 164-168.
8. Garrod, S., & Doherty, G. (1994). Conversation, co-ordination and convention: An empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions. Cognition, 53, 181-215.
9. Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child- Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Gelman, S. A., & Bloom, P. (2000). Young children are sensitive to how an object was created when deciding what to name it. Cognition, 76, 91-103.
11. Gelman, S. A., & Ebeling, K. S. (1998). Shape and representational status in children's early naming. Cognition, 66, 1335-1347.
12. Gelman, S. A., & Kramer, K. E. (1991). Understanding natural cause: Children's explanations of how objects and their properties originate. Child Development, 62, 396-414.
13. German, T. P., & Johnson, S. C. (2002). Function and the origins of the design. Journal of Cognition and Development, 3, 279-300.
14. Gibbings, S. (1990). The tie: Trends and traditions. New York: Barron's Educational Series.
15. Hall, D. G. (1995). Artifacts and origins. Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia.
16. Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
17. Kelemen, D. (1999). The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition, 70, 241-272.
18. Lewis, D. K. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Lewis, D. K. (1975). Language and languages. In K. Gunderson (Ed.), Language mind and knowledge (Vol. 7, pp. 3-33). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20. Matan, A., & Carey, S. (200 1). Developmental changes within the core of artifact concepts. Cognition, 78, 1-26.
21. Rips, L. J. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In A. O. S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 21-59). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural ecology of young children's interactions with objects and artifacts. In E. Winograd, R. Fivush, & W. Hirst (Eds.), Ecological approaches to cognition: Essays in honor of Ulric Neisser (pp. 153-170). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Tomasello, M., & Rakoczy, H. (2003). What makes human cognition unique? From individual to shared to collective intentionality. Mind & Language, 18, 121-147.
25. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.