Donor nephrectomy: Less fatigue and better quality of life following laparascopic kidney removal compared with an open procedure by mini-incision: Blind randomised study;Donornefrectomie: Minder vermoeidheid en meer kwaliteit van leven na een laparoscopische uitname dan na een open ingreep met een mini-incisie: Geblindeerd, gerandomiseerd onderzoek

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Volumn 151, Issue 24, 2007, Pages 1352-1360

  Kok, N F M ^a   Lind, M Y ^a   Hansson, B M E ^a   Pilzecker, D ^a   Mertens Zur Borg, I R A M ^a   Knipscheer, B C ^a   Hazebroek, E J ^a   Dooper, I M ^a   Weimar, W ^a   Hop, W C J ^a   Adang, E M M ^a   Van Der Wilt, G J ^a   Bonjer, H J ^a   Van Der Vliet, J A ^a   IJzermans, J N M ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY GRAFT; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURVIVAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34447260488     PISSN: 00282162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ingelfinger JR. Risks and benefits to the living donor. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:447-9.
2. Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 1995; 60:1047-9.
3. Srivastava A, Tripathi DM, Zaman W, Kumar A. Subcostal versus transcostal mini donor nephrectomy: is rib resection responsible for pain related donor morbidity? J Urol. 2003;170:738-40.
4. Yang SL, Harkaway R, Badosa F, Ginsberg P, Greenstein MA. Minimal incision living donor nephrectomy: improvement in patient outcome. Urology. 2002;59:673-7.
5. Kok NF, Alwayn IP, Lind MY, Tran KT, Weimar W, IJzermans JNM. Donor nephrectomy: mini-incision muscle-splitting open approach versus laparoscopy. Transplantation. 2006;81:881-7.
6. Wolf jr JS, Merion RM, Leichtman AB, Campbell jr DA, Magee JC, Punch JD, et al. Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 2001;72:284-90.
7. Simforoosh N, Basiri A, Tabibi A, Shakhssalim N, Hosseini Moghaddam SM. Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int. 2005;95:851-5.
8. Oyen O, Andersen M, Mathisen L, Kvarstein G, Edwin B, Line PD, et al. Laparoscopic versus open living-donor nephrectomy: experiences from a prospective, randomized, single-center study focusing on donor safety. Transplantation. 2005;79:1236-40.
9. Lewis GR, Brook NR, Waller JR, Bains JC, Veitch PS, Nicholson ML. A comparison of traditional open, minimal-incision donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int. 2004;17: 589-95.
10. Lind MY, Hazebroek EJ, Hop WC, Weimar W, Bonjer HJ, IJzermans JNM. Right-sided laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: is reluctance still justified? Transplantation. 2002;74:1045-8.
11. Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, Duijvendijk P van, Gouma DJ. Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44: 1800-7.
12. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute; 1993 en 2000.
13. Smets EM, Garssen B, Cull A, Haes JC de. Application of the multi-dimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Br J Cancer. 1996;73:241-5.
14. Klerk M de, Keizer KM, Claas FH, Witvliet M, Haase-Kromwijk BJ, Weimar W. The Dutch national living donor kidney exchange program. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:2302-5.
15. Berends FJ, Hoed PT den, Bonjer HJ, Kazemier G, Riemsdijk I van, Weimar W, et al. Technical considerations and pitfalls in laparoscopic live donornephrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:893-8.
16. Lind MY, Liem YS, Bemelman WA, Dooper PM, Hop WC, Weimar W, et al. Live donor nephrectomy and return to work: does the operative technique matter? Surg Endosc. 2003;17:591-5.
17. Perry KT, Freedland SJ, Hu JC, Phelan MW, Kristo B, Gritsch AH, et al. Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy. J Urol. 2003;169:2018-21.
18. Buell JF, Lee L, Martin JE, Dake NA, Cavanaugh TM, Hanaway MJ, et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs. open live donor nephrectomy: a quality of life and functional study. Clin Transplant. 2005;19: 102-9.
19. Kok NFM, Adang EMM, Hansson BME, Dooper IM, Weimar W, Wilt GJ van der, et al. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus mini-incision open donor nephrectomy: a randomized study. Transplantation. [ter perse].
20. Smith GC, Trauer T, Kerr PG, Chadban SJ. Prospective psychosocial monitoring of living kidney donors using the Short Form-36 health survey: results at 12 months. Transplantation. 2004;78:1384-9.
21. Kok NF, Alwayn IP, Tran KT, Hop WC, Weimar W, IJzermans JNM. Psychosocial and physical impairment after mini-incision open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective study. Transplantation. 2006;82:1291-7.
22. Majeed AW, Troy G, Nicholl JP, Smythe A, Reed MW, Stoddard CJ, et al. Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy. Lancet. 1996;347:989-94.
23. Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Stiernstam M, Westman B, Lundell L. Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2005;92:44-9.
24. Kok NF, Lind MY, Hansson BM, Pilzecker D, Mertens zur Borg IR, Knipscheer BC, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ. 2006;333:221-4.
25. Wadstrom J. Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: experience from the first 75 consecutive cases. Transplantation. 2005;80:1060-6.