A meta-analysis of direct and mediating effects of community coalitions that implemented science-based substance abuse prevention interventions

Substance Use and Misuse

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 985-1007

  Collins, David ^a,c   Johnson, Knowlton ^a   Becker, Betsy Jane ^b  

^a PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EVALUATION   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EVALUATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Community intervention; Protective factors; Risk factors; Science based prevention

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CIGARETTE SMOKING; COMMUNITY CARE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREVALENCE; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPHYLAXIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SCHOOL CHILD; SUBSTANCE ABUSE;

COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; COMMUNITY-INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; NEGOTIATING; RISK FACTORS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 34447253774     PISSN: 10826084     EISSN: 15322491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10826080701373238     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Arthur, M. W., Blitz, C. (2000). Bridging the gap between science and practice in drug abuse prevention through needs assessment and strategic community planning. Journal of Community Psychology, 28(3): 241-255.
2. Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F. (1998). Item-construct dictionary for the Student Survey of Risk and Protective Factors and Prevalence of Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use. Seattle, WA: Social Development Research Group, University of Washington and Developmental Research and Programs.
3. Backer, T. E. (2000). The failure of success: Challenges of disseminating effective substance abuse prevention programs. Journal of Community Psychology 28(3): 363-373.
4. Barton, W. H., Watkins, M., Harjoura, R. (1997). Youths and communities: Toward comprehensive strategies for youth development. Social Work 42: 483-493.
5. Becker, B. J. (1992). Using results from replicated studies to estimate linear models. Journal of Educational Statistics 17: 341-362.
6. Becker, B. J. (1995). Corrections to "Using results from replicated studies to estimate linear models." Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 20: 100-102.
7. Becker, B. J. (1997). Meta-analysis and models of substance abuse prevention. In W. J. Bukoski (Ed.), Meta-analysis of drug abuse prevention programs (NIDA Research Monograph No. 170, pp. 96-119). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
8. Becker, B. J., Fahrbach, K. (1994, April). A comparison of approaches to the synthesis of correlation matrices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
9. Bell, R. M., Ellickson, P. L., Harrison, E. R. (1993). Do drug prevention effects persist into high school? How Project Alert did with ninth graders. Preventive Medicine 22: 463-483.
10. Botvin, G. J., Baker, E., Dusenberry, L., Tortu, S., Botvin, E. M. (1990). Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multi-model cognitive-behavioral approach: Results of a three-year study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 58(4): 437-446.
11. Botvin, G. J., Renick, N. L. Baker, E. (1983). The effects of scheduling format and booster sessions on a broad-spectrum psychosocial approach to smoking prevention. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 6(4): 359-379.
12. Bukoski, W. J. (1997). Meta-analysis of drug abuse prevention programs (NIDA Research Monograph No. 170). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
13. Butterfoss, F., Francisco, V. T. (2003). Evaluating community partnerships and coalitions with practitioners in mind. Health Promotion Practice 5(2): 108-114.
14. Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A. M., Lonczak, H. S., Hawkins, J. D. (1998). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluation of positive youth development programs. Seattle, WA: University of Washington School of Social Work.
15. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. (2001). Science-based substance abuse prevention: A guide (DHHS Publication No. (SMA)01-3505). Washington, DC: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
16. Collins, D., Johnson, K. (2003). KIP project-level outcome evaluation of science-based interventions in 18 communities: Executive summary. Louisville, KY: Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation.
17. Cook, T. D., Gruder, C. L. (1978). Meta evaluation research. Evaluation Quarterly, 2(1): 5-51.
18. Cooper, H. M., Lindsey, J. J. (1998). Research synthesis and meta-analysis. In L. J. Bickman D. J. Rog (Eds.), Handbook of applied social research methods (pp 315-337). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Crowley, K. M., Yu, P., Kaftarian, S. J. (2000). Prevention actions and activities make a difference: A structural equation model of coalition building. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23: 381-388.
20. Cuijpers, P. (2002). Effective ingredients of school-based drug prevention programs: A systematic review. Addictive Behaviors, 27(6): 1009-1023.
21. Derzon, J. H. (1998). A synthesis of the evidence on the Hawkins Risk Factors for Predicting Alcohol, Tobacco, and Marijuana Use. Nashville, TN: Center for Evaluation Research and Methodology, Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies.
22. duToit, M., duToit, S. (2001). Interactive LISREL: User's guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
23. Ellickson, P. L., Bell, R. M. (1990). Drug prevention in junior high: A multi-site longitudinal test. Science, 247: 1299-1305.
24. Ellickson, P. L., Bell, R. M., Harrison, E. R. (1993). Changing adolescent propensities to use drugs: Results from Project ALERT. Health Education Quarterly, 20(2): 227-242.
25. Feinberg, M. E., Greenberg, M. T., Osgood, D. W. (2004). Readiness, functioning, and perceived effectiveness in community prevention coalitions: A study of communities that care. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33(3/4): 163-176.
26. Foster-Fishman, P. G., Berkowitz, S. L., Lounsbury, D. W., Jacobson, S., Allen, N. A. (2001). Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: A review and integrative framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2): 241-261.
27. Francis-Shepard, K. B. (1996). OJJDP operates national training and technical assistance center. Corrections Today, 58(6): 122.
28. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10): 3-8.
29. Gottfredson, D. C. Wilson, D. B. (2003). Characteristics of effective school-based substance abuse prevention. Prevention Science, 4(1): 27-38.
30. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31. Hallfors, D., Cho, H., Livert, D., Kadushin, C. (2002). How are community coalitions "fighting back" against substance abuse, and are they winning? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23: 237-245.
32. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1): 64-105.
33. Hedges, L. V., Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3(4): 486-504.
34. Johnson, C. A., Hansen, W. B., Pentz, M. A. (1986). Comprehensive community programs for drug abuse prevention. In S. Griswold-Ezekoye, L. Kumpfer, W. J. Bukoski (Eds.), Childhood and chemical abuse: Prevention and intervention (pp. 181-199). New York: Hawthorne Press.
35. Jöreskog, K. G. (2001). Analysis of ordinal variables 2: Cross-sectional data. Retrieved from June 1, 2004, http://ssicentral.com/ lisrel/ord2.pdf
36. Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
37. Judd, C. M., Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process evaluation: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5: 602-619.
38. Kam, C. M., Greenberg, M. T., Walls, C. T. (2003). Examining the role of implementation quality in school-based prevention using the PATHS curriculum. Prevention Science, 4(1): 55-63.
39. Kreuter, M. W., Lezin, N. A., Young, L. A. (2000). Evaluating community-based collaborative mechanisms: Implications for practitioners. Health Promotion Practice, 1: 49-63.
40. Mrazek, P. J., Haggerty, R. J. (Eds.). (1994). Reducing the risk for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
41. National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2003). Preventing drug use among children and adolescents: A research-based guide for parents, educators, and community leaders, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
42. Pentz, M. A. (2003). Evidence-based prevention: Characteristics, impact and future direction. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 35(1): 143-152.
43. Pentz, M. A., Trebow, E. A., Hansen, W. B., MacKinnon, D. P., Dwyer, J. H., Johnson, C. A., et al. (1990). Effects of program implementation on adolescent drug use behavior: The Midwestern Prevention Project (MPP). Evaluation Review, 14(3): 264-289.
44. Perry, C. L., Williams, C. L., Komro, K. A., Veblen-Mortensen, S. (2000). Project Northland: A community-wide approach to prevent young adolescent alcohol use. In W. B. Hansen, S. M. Giles, and M. D. Fearnow-Kenney (Eds.), Improving prevention effectiveness (pp. 225-234). Greensboro, NC: Tanglewood Research.
45. Pollard, J. A., Hawkins, J. D., Arthur, M. W. (1999). Risk and protection: Are both necessary to understand diverse behavioral outcomes in adolescence? Social Work Research, 23(3): 145-158.
46. Roussos, T. R., Fawcett, S. B. (2000). A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health, 21: 369-402.
47. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Shin, C. (1998). Direct and indirect latent parenting outcomes of two universal family-focused preventive interventions: Extending a public health-oriented research base. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66: 385-399.
48. St. Pierre, T. L., Mark, M. M., Kaltreider, D. L., Aiken, K. J. (1997). Involving parents of high-risk youth in drug prevention: A three-year longitudinal study in boys and girls clubs. Journal of Early Adolescence, 17(1): 21-50.
49. Tobler, N. (1994). Meta-analytical issues for prevention intervention research. In L. Seitz and L. Collins (Eds.), Advances in data analysis for prevention intervention research (NIH Pub. No. 94-3499, NIDA Research Monograph No. 14, pp. 342-403). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
50. Tobler, N. S. (1986). Meta-analysis of 143 adolescent drug prevention programs: Quantitative outcome results of program participants compared to a control or comparison group. Journal of Drug Issues, 16: 537-568.
51. Tobler, N. S. (1992). Drug prevention programs can work: Research findings. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 11: 1-28.
52. Tobler, N. S. (1997). Meta-analysis of adolescent drug prevention programs: Results of the 1993 meta-analysis. In W. J. Bukoski (Ed.), Meta-analysis of drug abuse prevention programs (NIH Pub. No. 97-4147, NIDA Research Monograph No. 170, pp. 96-119). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
53. Werts, C. F., Linn, R. L., Jöreskog, K. L. (1974). Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34: 25-33.
54. Yin, R. K., Ware, A. J. (2000). Using outcome data to evaluate community drug prevention initiatives: Pushing the state-of-the-art. Journal of Community Psychology, 28(3): 323-338.